Department of Defense awards $14.8M contract for Field Support Services, highlighting potential value concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,826,527 ($14.8M)
Contractor: World Technical Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-02-13
End Date: 2010-02-28
Contract Duration: 2,207 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200406!000285!5700!QA29 !6 CONS/LGC !FA481404C0010 !A!N! !N! ! !20040213!20050331!194163481!194163481!076637073!N!FIELD SUPPORT SERVICES, INC !3900 C STREET, SUITE 803 !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!02762!055!12!AVON PARK AF RANGE !HIGHLANDS !FLORIDA !+000002049857!N!N!000002049857!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!B!N!J!1!001!N!5A!Z!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!E! ! ! !D!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: AVON PARK, POLK County, FLORIDA, 33825
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.8 million to WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200406!000285!5700!QA29 !6 CONS/LGC !FA481404C0010 !A!N! !N! ! !20040213!20050331!194163481!194163481!076637073!N!FIELD SUPPORT SERVICES, INC !3900 C STREET, SUITE 803 !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!02762!055!12!AVON PARK AF RANGE !HIGH… Key points: 1. The contract's value of $14.8 million over its duration raises questions about cost-effectiveness. 2. Awarded as 'Not Available for Competition,' this limits insight into market pricing and competitive pressures. 3. The duration of the contract (2207 days) suggests a long-term need, but the lack of competition is a risk indicator. 4. Performance context is limited without specific details on services rendered and their impact. 5. The contract falls under 'Other Professional Services,' a broad category that requires further breakdown for precise sector analysis. 6. The absence of small business participation is noted, potentially missing opportunities for economic inclusion.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The total award amount of $14.8 million for Field Support Services over approximately six years suggests a significant investment. Without comparable contracts or detailed service breakdowns, it is difficult to benchmark the value for money. The 'Not Available for Competition' status further complicates a fair assessment of pricing, as market forces were not leveraged to ensure optimal cost efficiency. This award warrants closer scrutiny to understand if the price reflects a fair market value for the services provided.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded under a 'Not Available for Competition' basis, indicating that the solicitation was not broadly advertised or competed among multiple vendors. This typically occurs when only one source is capable of meeting the requirement, or in specific emergency situations. The lack of open competition means that the government did not benefit from the price discovery and innovation that typically arises from a competitive bidding process.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. Without multiple offers, there is less assurance that the price negotiated represents the best possible value.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of Defense and its personnel at the Avon Park Air Force Range in Florida, who receive essential support services. The services delivered are categorized broadly as 'Other Professional Services,' which could encompass a wide range of operational and administrative support. The geographic impact is centered on Florida, specifically the Avon Park Air Force Range. Workforce implications are not detailed but likely involve personnel employed by the contractor to deliver the support services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
- Limited transparency regarding the specific services and performance metrics.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to the sole-source nature of the award.
- Absence of small business participation could be a missed opportunity for economic development.
Positive Signals
- The contract addresses a specific need for field support services at a military installation.
- The duration suggests a stable, long-term requirement being met.
- The award was made to World Technical Services, Inc., indicating a known entity potentially with relevant experience.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the broad 'Other Professional Services' category, which is a significant segment of the federal services market. This sector encompasses a wide array of support functions critical to government operations, including administrative, technical, and specialized professional services. Federal spending in this area is substantial, with agencies often relying on external contractors to fulfill needs that are either specialized or require surge capacity. Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without more specific service details, but its $14.8 million value over nearly six years places it as a mid-sized award within the professional services landscape.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false) and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting plans for small businesses. This suggests that opportunities for small business participation were either not pursued or not mandated for this particular award. The absence of small business involvement means that a portion of the federal contracting dollars did not flow to this vital segment of the economy, potentially limiting the ecosystem's growth and diversity.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight mechanisms for this contract are not explicitly detailed in the provided data. However, as a Department of Defense contract, it would typically fall under the purview of the Department of Defense's Inspector General for audits and investigations. Accountability measures would be established through the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is limited by the 'Not Available for Competition' status, which restricts public insight into the justification and negotiation process.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Professional Services Contracts
- Department of Defense Contracts
- Air Force Base Support
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition.
- Lack of detailed service description hinders value assessment.
- No small business participation noted.
- Performance metrics not available.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, facilities-support-services, other-professional-services, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, florida, mid-size-contract, field-support, professional-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.8 million to WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. 200406!000285!5700!QA29 !6 CONS/LGC !FA481404C0010 !A!N! !N! ! !20040213!20050331!194163481!194163481!076637073!N!FIELD SUPPORT SERVICES, INC !3900 C STREET, SUITE 803 !ANCHORAGE !AK!99503!02762!055!12!AVON PARK AF RANGE !HIGHLANDS !FLORIDA !+000002049857!N!N!000002049857!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-02-13. End: 2010-02-28.
What specific services were included under this 'Field Support Services' contract?
The provided data categorizes the contract under 'Other Professional Services' (NAICS code 561210 - Facilities Support Services) and lists the description as 'FIELD SUPPORT SERVICES, INC'. However, the specific details of the services rendered are not elaborated upon in the data snippet. These services could range widely, potentially including base operations support, maintenance, logistics, administrative assistance, or specialized technical support required for the operations at the Avon Park Air Force Range. Without a more detailed statement of work or contract line item numbers (CLINs), the precise nature and scope of the support remain undefined.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The contract was awarded under the status 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' (CT: 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'). The specific justification for this sole-source award is not provided in the data. Typically, sole-source awards are made when only one responsible source is available to provide the required goods or services, often due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent, unforeseen needs. For a contract of this value and duration, a detailed justification, likely including market research and a determination of the lack of competition, would have been required by federal acquisition regulations. This justification would normally be documented and potentially made public through sources like SAM.gov.
How does the $14.8 million award compare to similar Field Support Services contracts?
Comparing the $14.8 million award for Field Support Services requires context on the duration and scope, which are partially available. The contract spanned from February 13, 2004, to February 28, 2010 (approximately 6 years, or 2207 days). While $14.8 million over six years averages to about $2.47 million per year, direct comparisons are difficult without knowing the specific services, location criticality, and labor mix. Larger, more comprehensive base operations support contracts can run into hundreds of millions annually. Smaller, specialized support contracts might be in the low millions. This contract appears to be of moderate size for specialized support at a specific facility, but its value proposition is unclear without knowing if it was competitively priced or if the scope was extensive.
What is the track record of World Technical Services, Inc. with federal contracts?
World Technical Services, Inc. (co: 'WORLD TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.') was the contractor for this $14.8 million Field Support Services contract. The provided data indicates this was a sole-source award from the Department of the Air Force. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their broader contract history, including past performance on similar services, any awards or penalties, and their overall performance ratings on other federal contracts. Without access to a comprehensive federal procurement database or past performance reviews, it's difficult to definitively assess their broader track record beyond this single contract.
What were the performance outcomes or effectiveness metrics for this contract?
The provided data does not include any information regarding the performance outcomes or effectiveness metrics for this contract. Federal contracts typically include performance standards, quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs), and key performance indicators (KPIs) that are used to evaluate the contractor's delivery of services. The success of this contract would be measured against these predefined metrics. Without access to contract performance reports, award fees, or any post-award evaluations, it is impossible to determine the effectiveness of the Field Support Services provided by World Technical Services, Inc.
How has federal spending on Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) evolved over time?
Federal spending on Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) has generally seen a consistent demand, reflecting the government's need to maintain and operate its vast infrastructure. While this specific contract dates back to 2004-2010, the overall trend in federal contracting for such services has been significant. Agencies like the Department of Defense, General Services Administration, and others frequently award contracts for facility maintenance, operations, and management. Spending levels can fluctuate based on budget appropriations, infrastructure investment priorities, and shifts towards outsourcing versus in-house management. Analyzing historical spending patterns requires looking at aggregate data across multiple agencies and contract vehicles over extended periods.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (UEI: 076637073)
Address: 3900 C STREET, SUITE 803, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00
Business Categories: Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-02-13
Current End Date: 2010-02-28
Potential End Date: 2010-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-10-30
More Contracts from World Technical Services, Inc.
- 200411!000589!2100!w9124l!aca, Fort Sill !W9124L04C0005 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040729!20040930!194163481!194163481!076637073!n!field Support Services, Inc !3900 C Street, Suite 803 !anchorage !ak!99503!27300!031!40!fort Sill !comanche !oklahoma !+000000201488!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!u!r!1!001!n!5a!c!y!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !D!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! !Y! !W804A6!0001! ! — $102.5M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $88.1M (Department of Defense)
- 200612!009690!2100!w56hzv!tacom - Warren !w56hzv06c0406 !A!N! !Y! ! !20060928!20140930!194163481!194163481!076637073!n!field Support Services, Inc !3900 C ST STE 803 !anchorage !ak!99503!03000!020!02!anchorage !anchorage !alaska !+000001564583!n!n!000000000000!az11!rdte/Other Research&development-Basic Research !a4a!combat Vehicles !000 !NOT Discernable !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!001!k! !A!Y!Z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $74.5M (Department of Defense)
- Support Services — $57.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Headquarters Library, Operations Services, Mail Center Operations Services, Janitorial Services, Helpdesk Services, and Archival Service — $19.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)