Army awards $25.7M for Specialized Ammunition and Ordnance Machinery to Shaw Environmental, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,720,365 ($25.7M)

Contractor: Shaw Environmental, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-26

End Date: 2008-01-08

Contract Duration: 834 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200512!500550!2100!W911RP!US ARMY ROBERT MORRIS ACQUISITIO!W911RP05C0032 !A!N! !N! ! !20050926!20070131!085282189!085282189!180038382!N!SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC !100 TECHNOLOGY CTR DR !STOUGHTON !MA!02072!55340!069!05!PINE BLUFF ARSENAL !JEFFERSON !ARKANSAS !+000023005000!N!N!000031053899!3690!SPECIALIZED AMMUNITION AND ORDNANCE MACH !B9 !PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!002!B! !A!N!A! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: WHITE HALL, JEFFERSON County, ARKANSAS, 71602

State: Arkansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.7 million to SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. for work described as: 200512!500550!2100!W911RP!US ARMY ROBERT MORRIS ACQUISITIO!W911RP05C0032 !A!N! !N! ! !20050926!20070131!085282189!085282189!180038382!N!SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC !100 TECHNOLOGY CTR DR !STOUGHTON !MA!02072!55340!069!05!PINE BLUFF ARSENAL !JEFF… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $25.7 million, was awarded to Shaw Environmental, Inc. 2. This contract falls under the Engineering Services sector, with a specific focus on specialized ammunition and ordnance machinery. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of the contract is 834 days, indicating a medium-term project.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $25.7 million for specialized ordnance machinery and engineering services appears to be within a reasonable range for such complex and niche requirements. Benchmarking against similar specialized defense contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds are being utilized efficiently, with pricing determined through a market-driven process.

Public Impact

Supports critical defense infrastructure related to ordnance and ammunition. Ensures the availability of specialized machinery for military production and maintenance. Contributes to the operational readiness of the U.S. Army. The contract's success could influence future procurements in the defense manufacturing sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), specifically addressing the complex needs of specialized ammunition and ordnance machinery. Spending in this niche defense sub-sector is often driven by modernization efforts and readiness requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor, Shaw Environmental, Inc., is likely a large business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Standard oversight mechanisms for defense contracts would apply, including performance monitoring and financial audits to ensure accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, ar, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.7 million to SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.. 200512!500550!2100!W911RP!US ARMY ROBERT MORRIS ACQUISITIO!W911RP05C0032 !A!N! !N! ! !20050926!20070131!085282189!085282189!180038382!N!SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC !100 TECHNOLOGY CTR DR !STOUGHTON !MA!02072!55340!069!05!PINE BLUFF ARSENAL !JEFFERSON !ARKANSAS !+000023005000!N!N!000031053899!3690!SPECIALIZED AMMUNITION AND ORDNANCE MACH !B9 !PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-26. End: 2008-01-08.

What specific types of specialized ammunition and ordnance machinery are covered under this contract, and how do they align with current Army modernization priorities?

The contract specifies 'Specialized Ammunition and Ordnance Machinery' without granular detail. Understanding the exact nature of this machinery is crucial to assess its relevance to current Army modernization priorities. If it pertains to advanced munitions or next-generation ordnance systems, it aligns well. However, if it relates to legacy systems, its strategic value might be diminished, potentially impacting long-term effectiveness and value for taxpayer money.

Given the specialized nature of the equipment, what are the primary risks associated with the contractor's ability to deliver on time and within budget?

The primary risks include potential technical complexities in manufacturing or integrating highly specialized machinery, leading to delays and cost overruns. Contractor performance history in similar complex defense projects is a key indicator. Furthermore, reliance on specific supply chains for unique components could introduce vulnerabilities. Robust project management and contingency planning by both the contractor and the Army are essential to mitigate these risks.

How will the effectiveness of this contract be measured, particularly concerning the operational impact of the delivered machinery on Army readiness?

Effectiveness will likely be measured through a combination of technical performance metrics (e.g., machinery uptime, output quality, adherence to specifications) and operational readiness indicators. This could include reduced maintenance times for ordnance, increased production capacity for critical ammunition types, or successful integration into existing Army logistics and maintenance frameworks. User feedback from operational units will also be a critical component of assessing true effectiveness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Shaw Group Inc., the (UEI: 180038382)

Address: 100 TECHNOLOGY CTR DR, STOUGHTON, MA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-09-26

Current End Date: 2008-01-08

Potential End Date: 2008-01-08 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-01-27

More Contracts from Shaw Environmental, Inc.

View all Shaw Environmental, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending