Dod's $37.35M Defined Life Cycle Software Contract Awarded to Data Systems Analysts Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $37,351,312 ($37.4M)

Contractor: Data Systems Analysts Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-02-08

End Date: 2016-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,939 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: DEFINED LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE

Place of Performance

Location: FREDERICK, FREDERICK County, MARYLAND, 21702

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $37.4 million to DATA SYSTEMS ANALYSTS INC for work described as: DEFINED LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE Key points: 1. Contract value of $37.35M over 5 years. 2. Awarded under Full and Open Competition. 3. Research and Development sector, specifically software. 4. Potential for cost overruns due to Cost Plus Award Fee structure.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for potential overruns if performance targets are not met. Benchmarking against similar R&D software contracts is difficult without more detailed performance data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources indicates a competitive process was used. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for R&D in software, aiming for technological advancement within the Department of Defense.

Public Impact

Enhances defense information systems through software development. Supports technological innovation within the military. Funds research and development activities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on software for the Defense Information Systems Agency. Benchmarks for R&D software contracts vary widely based on complexity and innovation.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities were pursued.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency, focusing on performance against award fee criteria and adherence to contract terms.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $37.4 million to DATA SYSTEMS ANALYSTS INC. DEFINED LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DATA SYSTEMS ANALYSTS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $37.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-02-08. End: 2016-05-31.

What specific software capabilities were developed or enhanced under this contract, and how do they align with current defense needs?

The contract focused on 'DEFINED LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE' for the Defense Information Systems Agency. Without specific deliverables, it's challenging to assess the direct alignment with current defense needs. However, the R&D nature suggests an aim to develop or improve foundational software systems critical for information superiority and operational effectiveness.

How effectively did the Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivize performance and control costs for this R&D software project?

The Cost Plus Award Fee structure aims to balance cost control with performance incentives. For R&D, it allows flexibility for unforeseen technical challenges while rewarding successful outcomes. However, without detailed performance reports and award fee determinations, it's difficult to definitively assess its effectiveness in this specific case.

What was the competitive landscape for this contract, and did the 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' method yield optimal value?

The method implies that while competition was sought, specific sources were initially excluded, possibly due to unique qualifications or prior work. Full and open competition generally promotes better value. The success in achieving optimal value would depend on the number of bidders and the final negotiated price relative to the scope and expected outcomes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10300 EATON PL STE 500, FAIRFAX, VA, 22030

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $37,827,223

Exercised Options: $37,827,223

Current Obligation: $37,351,312

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $947,679

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC102808D2006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-02-08

Current End Date: 2016-05-31

Potential End Date: 2016-05-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-09-05

More Contracts from Data Systems Analysts Inc

View all Data Systems Analysts Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending