NASA awards $19.8M contract for security services to SECTEK, INC. over six years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,858,558 ($19.9M)
Contractor: Sectek, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2006-03-02
End Date: 2012-04-30
Contract Duration: 2,251 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.8K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NASA SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20546
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $19.9 million to SECTEK, INC. for work described as: NASA SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of security services required. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competitive award, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm-fixed-price contract type and established contractor. 4. Performance context suggests a need for ongoing security support at NASA facilities. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader government security services market.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $19.8 million over six years averages to about $3.3 million annually. This figure seems aligned with the cost of providing comprehensive security guard and patrol services for a federal agency like NASA. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security services at large federal installations would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment, but initial indications suggest a fair price point.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of two bidders indicates a degree of competition, which is generally positive for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers. The specific details of the bidding process and the number of proposals received would offer further insight into the intensity of the competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.
Public Impact
NASA facilities and personnel are protected by the security services provided. The contract ensures the continuous operation of security guard and patrol services. The primary geographic impact is within the District of Columbia, where the services are rendered. The contract supports jobs within the security services industry.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process, indicating potential for good value.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type helps control costs and manage budget.
- Contract duration of over six years allows for stable service provision.
- Contractor has a track record with the agency, suggesting familiarity and established processes.
Sector Analysis
The security services sector for government contracts is a significant market. This contract falls under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 for Security Guards and Patrol Services. Spending in this sector is driven by the need for physical security across various federal agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large federal contracts for similar security services at major government facilities.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information on subcontracting plans. The award to SECTEK, INC., a firm that may or may not be classified as a small business, means the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not immediately clear without further data on the contractor's size and subcontracting practices.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within NASA. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring SECTEK, INC. to deliver specified services. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Protective Service Contracts
- Department of Homeland Security Security Services
- General Services Administration Schedules for Security Services
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is lengthy, requiring sustained oversight.
- Performance metrics and quality assurance details are not publicly detailed.
Tags
security-services, nasa, district-of-columbia, competitive-delivery-order, large-contract, firm-fixed-price, guard-services, federal-agency, it-support-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $19.9 million to SECTEK, INC.. NASA SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SECTEK, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-03-02. End: 2012-04-30.
What is SECTEK, INC.'s track record with NASA and other federal agencies?
SECTEK, INC. has a history of performing contracts for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), as evidenced by this award. To fully assess their track record, a review of their past performance evaluations, any past disputes or claims, and the volume and value of their previous federal contracts would be necessary. Information on their performance with other federal agencies would also provide a broader picture of their capabilities and reliability in delivering security services.
How does the value of this contract compare to similar security service contracts awarded by NASA or other agencies?
The total value of $19.8 million over approximately 74 months (2251 days) equates to an average annual value of roughly $3.3 million. This figure needs to be benchmarked against contracts for similar security guard and patrol services at comparable federal facilities. Factors such as the size of the facility, the number of personnel required, the specific security requirements (e.g., access control, surveillance, response), and the geographic location all influence contract value. Without specific comparable data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or fair value.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
The primary risks associated with a security services contract include potential lapses in security coverage, contractor performance issues, and cost overruns. However, this contract utilizes a firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure, which significantly mitigates the risk of cost overruns for the government. The competitive award process also suggests a selection of a capable vendor. Mitigation of performance risks would rely on NASA's contract administration, performance monitoring, and defined remedies for non-performance outlined in the contract.
How effective has SECTEK, INC. been in fulfilling its security obligations under this contract?
Assessing the effectiveness of SECTEK, INC. in fulfilling its obligations under this specific contract requires access to NASA's performance evaluations and contract administration records. Since the contract was awarded in March 2006 and ended in April 2012, historical performance data would be available. Key metrics would include adherence to service level agreements, incident response times, personnel qualifications, and overall client satisfaction as documented by NASA officials overseeing the contract.
What has been the historical spending pattern for security services at NASA facilities?
Historical spending on security services at NASA facilities would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors utilized over time. Analyzing past NASA contracts for security guards and patrol services would show whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing. It would also indicate if there's a pattern of awarding contracts competitively or through other means, and whether specific facilities or regions account for a larger portion of the security budget.
What is the significance of the contract type (Firm Fixed Price) for this security service?
The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is significant because it shifts the majority of the financial risk from the government to the contractor, SECTEK, INC. Under an FFP contract, the price is set and not subject to adjustment based on the contractor's cost experience. This provides NASA with cost certainty and predictability, making it easier to budget for security services. It incentivizes the contractor to manage its costs efficiently to maintain profitability, while ensuring the government pays a predetermined amount for the specified services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11413 ISAAC NEWTON SQ S, RESTON, VA, 11
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Subchapter S Corporation
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,858,558
Exercised Options: $19,858,558
Current Obligation: $19,858,558
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS07F0279M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-03-02
Current End Date: 2012-04-30
Potential End Date: 2012-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-11-28
More Contracts from Sectek, Inc.
- Protective Services Contract — $121.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Security Guard Services - Base Year. Contacts: Becky Morehart (procurement); Kevin Lewis (cotr) and JOE Burns (OAS) — $64.7M (Department of Commerce)
- Security Services — $39.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- FY04 Security Guard Services — $29.9M (Department of the Treasury)
- Security Services for Goddard Space Flight Center — $29.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →