NASA's $39.7M Security Services Contract with SECTEK, Inc. Awarded Competitively
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $39,715,753 ($39.7M)
Contractor: Sectek, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-11-01
End Date: 2013-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,977 days
Daily Burn Rate: $20.1K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SECURITY SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20771
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $39.7 million to SECTEK, INC. for work described as: SECURITY SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $39.7M over 5.5 years. 2. Competitively awarded, indicating potential for good pricing. 3. Risk is moderate given the long duration and fixed-price nature. 4. Sector is Security Services, a common government need.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's firm fixed price structure suggests predictable costs. Benchmarking against similar security guard contracts would provide a clearer picture of value, but the competitive award is a positive indicator.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
Awarded via a competitive delivery order, this method likely fostered price discovery and ensured a reasonable price. The specific competition details would offer more insight into the level of price pressure.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers received fair value for the security services provided.
Public Impact
Ensured security for NASA facilities, a critical government function. Supported jobs in the security services industry. Provided essential services over a significant contract period.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (5.5 years) could lead to price escalation if not managed.
- Fixed-price contract may not fully account for unforeseen security challenges.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes assessing effectiveness difficult.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
- Awarded to a single entity, potentially simplifying management.
Sector Analysis
Security services are essential for government operations, encompassing guard services, patrol, and monitoring. Spending in this sector is consistent across agencies, with benchmarks varying based on location and service level.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded to a small business, indicating a lack of opportunity for small businesses in this specific procurement.
Oversight & Accountability
The competitive delivery order process implies some level of oversight. However, further details on performance monitoring and contract management would be needed to fully assess accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Security Guards and Patrol Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration
- Fixed-price contract
- Lack of performance data
- Not awarded to small business
Tags
security-guards-and-patrol-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $39.7 million to SECTEK, INC.. SECURITY SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SECTEK, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $39.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-11-01. End: 2013-03-31.
What was the competitive landscape like for this delivery order, and how did it influence the final price?
The data indicates a 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER,' suggesting multiple bids were likely submitted. This competition is crucial for price discovery, as it incentivizes offerors to provide competitive pricing to win the contract. The final price is therefore expected to reflect market conditions and the urgency of NASA's need, rather than being solely dictated by the contractor.
What are the primary risks associated with a 5.5-year fixed-price contract for security services?
The primary risks include potential cost overruns for the contractor if labor or operational costs increase significantly over the contract period, potentially leading to reduced service quality. For the government, the risk is that the fixed price may not adapt to evolving security threats or technological advancements, requiring potential modifications or new contracts. Service quality degradation due to contractor cost-cutting is also a concern.
How effectively did this contract meet NASA's security needs over its duration?
The provided data does not include performance metrics or user feedback, making a definitive assessment of effectiveness impossible. However, the contract's renewal or completion without major reported issues suggests a baseline level of satisfaction. A thorough review would require access to performance reports, incident logs, and stakeholder evaluations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: NNG07195067Q
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1930 ISAAC NEWTON SQ. SUITE 100, RESTON, VA, 11
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Subchapter S Corporation
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $39,715,753
Exercised Options: $39,715,753
Current Obligation: $39,715,753
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS07F0279M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-11-01
Current End Date: 2013-03-31
Potential End Date: 2013-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-07-18
More Contracts from Sectek, Inc.
- Protective Services Contract — $121.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Security Guard Services - Base Year. Contacts: Becky Morehart (procurement); Kevin Lewis (cotr) and JOE Burns (OAS) — $64.7M (Department of Commerce)
- FY04 Security Guard Services — $29.9M (Department of the Treasury)
- Security Services for Goddard Space Flight Center — $29.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Guard Services (armed and Unarmed) — $26.2M (Securities and Exchange Commission)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →