NASA's $121.7M Protective Services Contract Awarded to SECTEK, Inc. Under Competitive Delivery Order
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $121,709,456 ($121.7M)
Contractor: Sectek, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2004-06-01
End Date: 2015-10-31
Contract Duration: 4,169 days
Daily Burn Rate: $29.2K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $121.7 million to SECTEK, INC. for work described as: PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $121.7 million over 11 years. 2. Awarded under a competitive delivery order, suggesting some price discovery. 3. Focus on security guards and patrol services, a critical but potentially commoditized sector. 4. Long duration of the contract (4169 days) may present risks for price escalation. 5. No explicit mention of small business participation.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's firm fixed price structure provides cost certainty. However, the long duration and the nature of security services may lead to price increases over time if not managed effectively. Benchmarking against similar security contracts would be beneficial.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
Awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely competed, which should have driven a more favorable price. The specific competition method and the number of bids received would provide further insight into price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received a fair price, though the long contract term warrants ongoing scrutiny for potential cost creep.
Public Impact
Ensures security for NASA facilities, protecting personnel and assets. Supports jobs in the security services industry. Long-term commitment provides stability for the contractor and consistent service delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 11 years) increases risk of price escalation.
- Lack of explicit small business participation noted.
- Potential for service commoditization impacting long-term value.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process.
- Firm fixed price contract type.
- Consistent service delivery over a long period.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically security and investigation services. Spending in this area is often driven by regulatory requirements and the need to protect critical infrastructure and sensitive information. Benchmarks for similar security contracts can vary widely based on scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were subcontracted or if there was an opportunity for them to participate in the prime contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded as a delivery order under a larger agreement, suggesting it may have undergone initial oversight. However, the long duration necessitates continuous monitoring to ensure performance standards are met and costs remain justified.
Related Government Programs
- Security Guards and Patrol Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (over 11 years) increases risk of price escalation and potential for outdated service models.
- Lack of explicit small business participation could indicate missed opportunities for economic inclusion.
- Potential for service commoditization may lead to reduced innovation or focus on cost-cutting over quality.
- The 'CALIFORNIA' location may imply higher labor costs compared to other regions.
- No clear indication of performance metrics or quality assurance in the provided summary data.
Tags
security-guards-and-patrol-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, delivery-order, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $121.7 million to SECTEK, INC.. PROTECTIVE SERVICES CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SECTEK, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $121.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-06-01. End: 2015-10-31.
What was the specific competitive process used for this delivery order, and how many bids were received?
The data indicates a 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER,' suggesting multiple vendors were invited to bid. However, the exact number of bids and the specific competitive procedures (e.g., best value, lowest price technically acceptable) are not detailed. Understanding these specifics would clarify the extent of price discovery and competition achieved.
How does SECTEK, Inc.'s pricing compare to industry benchmarks for similar security guard and patrol services, considering the contract's duration and scope?
Without specific per-unit cost data or detailed scope of work, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, a $121.7 million contract over 11 years for security services is substantial. Comparing average hourly rates, supervisor ratios, and overhead costs against government-wide or agency-specific benchmarks for similar services would reveal potential overpricing or cost efficiencies.
What mechanisms are in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of security services throughout the 11-year contract term?
The firm fixed price contract type implies performance standards are contractually defined. NASA likely has quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs) to monitor service delivery. Regular performance reviews, key performance indicator tracking, and clear procedures for addressing deficiencies are crucial for maintaining effectiveness over such a long period.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1930 ISAAC NEWTON SQ. SUITE 100, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $122,017,295
Exercised Options: $122,017,295
Current Obligation: $121,709,456
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS07F0279M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-06-01
Current End Date: 2015-10-31
Potential End Date: 2015-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-11-09
More Contracts from Sectek, Inc.
- Security Guard Services - Base Year. Contacts: Becky Morehart (procurement); Kevin Lewis (cotr) and JOE Burns (OAS) — $64.7M (Department of Commerce)
- Security Services — $39.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- FY04 Security Guard Services — $29.9M (Department of the Treasury)
- Security Services for Goddard Space Flight Center — $29.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Guard Services (armed and Unarmed) — $26.2M (Securities and Exchange Commission)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →