NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center awarded $149M IT integration and support contract to Business Integra Technology Solutions
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $149,343,284 ($149.3M)
Contractor: Business Integra Technology Solutions, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2017-02-01
End Date: 2022-07-31
Contract Duration: 2,006 days
Daily Burn Rate: $74.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 16
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF GODDARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION&SUPPORT SERVICES - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP, SUSTAIN AND MANAGE IT SUPPORT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ESTABLISHED SOFTWARE AND WEB STANDARDS. - DEVELOPMENT OF AN IT INTEGRATION STRATEGY THAT IS ALIGNED WITH THE GSFCS STRATEGIC GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COST, SCHEDULE, RISK, AND TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT OF ALL IT SUPPORT AND SERVICES, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE NECESSARY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FOR ALL IT PROJECTS UNDER THE GSFC ITCD, AND SHALL ADHERE TO NASA SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESSES.
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20771
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $149.3 million to BUSINESS INTEGRA TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF GODDARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION&SUPPORT SERVICES - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP, SUSTAIN AND MANAGE IT SUPPORT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ESTABLISHED SOFTWARE AND WEB STANDARDS. - DEVELOPMENT OF AN IT INTEGRATION STRATEGY THAT IS ALIGNED WITH THE GSFCS STRATEGI… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on developing, sustaining, and managing IT support aligned with strategic goals. 2. Includes cost, schedule, risk, and technical management for all IT support and services. 3. Requires adherence to NASA systems engineering processes and established software/web standards. 4. Contract duration spans over 5 years, indicating a long-term need for IT services. 5. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which allows for cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee. 6. This contract is a significant investment in maintaining and advancing IT infrastructure at GSFC.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $149.3 million over approximately 5.4 years suggests a substantial but potentially reasonable investment for comprehensive IT integration and support services for a major NASA center. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT support contracts within federal agencies is necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the scope of services, including strategic IT development, systems engineering, and ongoing management, indicates a broad and critical function.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which implies a competitive process but with specific limitations or exclusions. The number of offers received (16) suggests a healthy level of interest, but the 'exclusion of sources' aspect warrants further investigation to understand if it restricted the competitive landscape unnecessarily. This type of competition can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing compared to unrestricted full and open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: While some competition existed, the exclusion of certain sources may have limited the potential for the most cost-effective bids, potentially impacting taxpayer savings.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center by ensuring robust IT infrastructure and support. Delivers essential IT integration strategy, development, and ongoing management services. Supports the operational efficiency and strategic objectives of the GSFC ITCD. Impacts the IT workforce within GSFC and potentially the contractor's organization through employment opportunities. Ensures compliance with federal IT standards and NASA's specific engineering processes.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition method could limit overall price competition.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can sometimes incentivize cost overruns if not closely monitored.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical IT infrastructure management poses a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- The high number of offers (16) indicates significant contractor interest and a potentially capable market.
- The contract duration suggests a stable, long-term need and commitment from the agency.
- The focus on strategic alignment and adherence to NASA standards points to a well-defined scope of work.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically Computer Facilities Management Services. The federal IT services market is vast and highly competitive, with agencies increasingly relying on contractors for specialized expertise in areas like IT integration, cloud services, cybersecurity, and systems engineering. This contract represents a significant portion of spending within this sub-sector for NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, aiming to ensure the operational continuity and strategic advancement of its IT capabilities.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside goal (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary focus was on obtaining the best technical solution through a competitive process, rather than specifically reserving a portion for small businesses. While there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses, the prime contract was not awarded with a small business set-aside provision.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center contracting officers and program managers. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates diligent financial oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable. Performance monitoring against contract requirements, including adherence to software standards and systems engineering processes, would be crucial. The Inspector General's office may conduct audits or investigations as deemed necessary.
Related Government Programs
- NASA IT Support Services
- Federal Civilian IT Contracts
- Computer Facilities Management Services
- NASA Systems Engineering Support
- IT Integration Strategy Development
Risk Flags
- Competition Method Limitation
- Cost Control in CPFF Contracts
- Contractor Performance Risk
Tags
it-services, nasa, maryland, definitive-contract, large-contract, limited-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, computer-facilities-management-services, systems-engineering, it-integration
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $149.3 million to BUSINESS INTEGRA TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF GODDARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION&SUPPORT SERVICES - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP, SUSTAIN AND MANAGE IT SUPPORT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ESTABLISHED SOFTWARE AND WEB STANDARDS. - DEVELOPMENT OF AN IT INTEGRATION STRATEGY THAT IS ALIGNED WITH THE GSFCS STRATEGIC GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COST, SCHEDULE, RISK, AND TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT OF ALL IT SUPPORT AND SERVICES, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE NECESS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BUSINESS INTEGRA TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $149.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-02-01. End: 2022-07-31.
What is the track record of Business Integra Technology Solutions, Inc. with NASA and other federal agencies?
Business Integra Technology Solutions, Inc. has a history of performing IT services for federal agencies. While specific details on past performance metrics for this particular contract are not provided in the summary data, their ability to win a significant contract like this from NASA suggests they have met certain performance and capability requirements. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues or successes on similar contracts, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and expertise. Reviewing their award history across different agencies and contract types can also shed light on their overall federal contracting performance.
How does the awarded amount compare to similar IT integration and support contracts at other NASA centers or federal agencies?
The $149.3 million contract value for IT integration and support services over approximately 5.4 years at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center is substantial. To benchmark this, one would need to compare it with contracts of similar scope and duration for IT management, systems engineering, and strategic IT development at other large federal agencies or NASA centers. Factors like the specific services required, the complexity of the IT environment, and the prevailing market rates for such services would influence comparability. Without direct comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or fair value, but the scale suggests it's a significant investment for critical IT functions.
What are the primary risks associated with this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract structure?
The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts, as the government reimburses allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. This can potentially lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently. For the government, effective oversight is crucial to ensure that all claimed costs are reasonable, allocable, and necessary for contract performance. The fixed fee, however, does provide some predictability in contractor profit. The success of a CPFF contract heavily relies on robust government oversight and clear performance metrics.
How effective are the IT integration strategies developed under this contract in achieving GSFC's strategic goals?
The effectiveness of the IT integration strategies developed under this contract in achieving GSFC's strategic goals is a critical performance indicator that would be assessed throughout the contract's lifecycle. The contract mandates that the contractor develop an IT integration strategy aligned with GSFC's strategic goals and objectives. Success would be measured by how well these strategies enable GSFC to meet its mission requirements, improve operational efficiency, enhance data management, and adapt to evolving technological landscapes. Regular reviews, performance metrics, and feedback loops between GSFC and the contractor are essential for ensuring alignment and effectiveness.
What is the historical spending trend for IT support and integration services at Goddard Space Flight Center?
Analyzing historical spending trends for IT support and integration services at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) would provide context for the $149.3 million awarded amount. This involves examining previous contracts for similar services, their values, durations, and the contractors involved. A trend of increasing or consistently high spending in this area would indicate a sustained and growing reliance on external IT support. Conversely, fluctuating spending might suggest shifts in agency strategy, in-sourcing efforts, or changes in technology adoption. Understanding this history helps assess whether the current contract represents a continuation, expansion, or modification of past IT investment strategies.
What are the implications of the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' for price discovery and overall value?
The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' (FOUCAES) method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were deliberately excluded. This exclusion can limit the pool of potential bidders, potentially reducing the intensity of price competition compared to unrestricted full and open competition. While 16 offers were received, indicating some level of market interest, the exclusion could mean that the most competitive offers, perhaps from companies that were excluded, were not considered. This can impact price discovery by preventing the market from setting the absolute lowest possible price, potentially leading to a less optimal value for taxpayers.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNG14475415R
Offers Received: 16
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 450, BETHESDA, MD, 20817
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $206,000,000
Exercised Options: $206,000,000
Current Obligation: $149,343,284
Actual Outlays: $98,941,110
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-02-01
Current End Date: 2022-07-31
Potential End Date: 2022-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-24
More Contracts from Business Integra Technology Solutions, Inc.
- Closely Associated Igf::cl::igf Administrative and Information Support Services for the Department of State — $141.0M (Department of State)
- THE Purpose of This Task Order IS to Provide Information Security and Privacy (IS&P) Program Support. Igf::ot::igf — $97.9M (Department of Transportation)
- Information Services — $29.9M (Department of Defense)
View all Business Integra Technology Solutions, Inc. federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →