NASA's $101.9M Facilities Maintenance Contract Awarded to IAP World Services, Inc. for California Operations
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $101,886,354 ($101.9M)
Contractor: IAP World Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2010-10-01
End Date: 2015-10-30
Contract Duration: 1,855 days
Daily Burn Rate: $54.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES (FMS)
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $101.9 million to IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC. for work described as: FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES (FMS) Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical NASA infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure requires careful monitoring to manage potential cost overruns. 4. Contract duration of over 5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 5. Performance in California highlights a focus on a specific geographic region for NASA's facilities. 6. The award to a single contractor, IAP World Services, Inc., warrants scrutiny of their capacity and past performance.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without specific service details and performance metrics. However, the total award of over $100 million for facilities maintenance over five years suggests a substantial scope of work. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure, while common for complex services, carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not managed diligently. Comparing this to similar large-scale facilities maintenance contracts across government agencies would provide a clearer picture of value for money, but such data is not readily available in this summary.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With seven bidders participating, the competition level appears healthy, which typically fosters price discovery and can lead to more favorable terms for the government. The presence of multiple bidders suggests that the market for these services is sufficiently competitive.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely drove down costs and ensured the government received a fair price for essential facilities maintenance services.
Public Impact
NASA facilities in California will benefit from consistent and reliable maintenance, ensuring operational continuity. The contract supports the upkeep of critical infrastructure essential for space exploration and research activities. Local workforce in California may see employment opportunities in facilities management, maintenance, and related trades. The services provided are crucial for the safety and functionality of NASA's scientific and operational sites.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts can incentivize contractors to incur costs, requiring robust oversight to prevent unnecessary expenditures.
- The long duration of the contract may lead to complacency or reduced innovation if not actively managed.
- Reliance on a single contractor for extensive facilities maintenance could pose risks if the contractor experiences performance issues or financial instability.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market and potentially good value.
- The contractor, IAP World Services, Inc., has a track record in government contracting, implying experience in managing large-scale service agreements.
- The contract's focus on facilities maintenance ensures the upkeep of essential government assets.
Sector Analysis
Facilities maintenance services are a critical component of government operations, ensuring the functionality and longevity of physical assets. This contract falls within the broader facilities support services sector, which includes a wide range of activities from janitorial services to complex building system maintenance. The market for these services is substantial, with numerous private sector companies specializing in government contracts. NASA's spending in this area is consistent with the needs of large research and operational facilities.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside criterion for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor, IAP World Services, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, there is no explicit requirement or indication of a dedicated small business subcontracting plan within this summary. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement and its impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by NASA contracting officers and program managers responsible for facilities. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure necessitates diligent financial oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable. Transparency would be enhanced through regular performance reporting and audits. The Inspector General's office for NASA would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Buildings Fund
- Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Other Agency Facilities Support Services
Risk Flags
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage potential cost overruns.
- Long contract duration may necessitate proactive performance management to ensure continued quality.
- Reliance on a single prime contractor for extensive services warrants monitoring of contractor stability and performance.
Tags
facilities-maintenance, facilities-support-services, nasa, california, definitive-contract, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, infrastructure-maintenance, government-contracting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $101.9 million to IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC.. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES (FMS)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $101.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-10-01. End: 2015-10-30.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities maintenance services at NASA, and how does this contract compare?
Analyzing NASA's historical spending on facilities maintenance requires access to detailed budget and contract databases. However, it's common for agencies like NASA, with extensive research and operational facilities, to allocate significant portions of their budget to maintaining these assets. Contracts of this magnitude (over $100 million) are indicative of the ongoing need for comprehensive maintenance programs. Without specific historical data for NASA's FMS, a direct comparison is difficult, but such awards suggest a consistent and substantial requirement for these services over time to ensure the operational readiness and safety of its installations.
What specific types of facilities maintenance are covered under this contract?
The contract designation 'FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES (FMS)' and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) suggest a broad scope of work. This typically includes routine and preventive maintenance, repair services, custodial services, grounds maintenance, pest control, and potentially specialized services for scientific equipment or unique facility structures. Given NASA's specialized facilities, the contract likely encompasses maintenance of HVAC systems, electrical grids, plumbing, structural integrity, and potentially cleanroom environments or specialized laboratory support systems. The exact services would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW).
What is the track record of IAP World Services, Inc. in performing similar government contracts?
IAP World Services, Inc. is a known entity in the government contracting space, often involved in providing facilities management, logistics, and aviation support services to various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and the Department of State. Their experience typically spans large-scale, complex operations in diverse geographic locations, often including challenging environments. A review of their past performance ratings, contract awards, and any reported disputes or terminations would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and track record for this specific NASA contract. Generally, their presence suggests a capacity to handle significant government service contracts.
How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) structure impact the government's financial risk and oversight requirements?
The Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contract type means the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. This structure is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or involves significant uncertainty. For the government, the primary financial risk is that actual costs could exceed initial estimates, although the fixed fee provides some predictability in profit. This necessitates robust government oversight to ensure that all claimed costs are allowable, reasonable, and allocable to the contract. Detailed auditing and regular reviews of contractor expenditures are critical to managing the financial exposure associated with CPFF contracts.
What are the potential implications of this contract for NASA's operational efficiency and research capabilities?
Effective facilities maintenance is fundamental to NASA's operational efficiency and research capabilities. A well-maintained infrastructure ensures that laboratories, launch facilities, testing sites, and administrative buildings are safe, functional, and reliable. This contract, by ensuring the upkeep of these critical assets, directly supports NASA's mission-critical activities, from space exploration to scientific research. Disruptions due to facility failures can lead to significant delays, increased costs, and potential setbacks in research timelines. Therefore, the successful execution of this facilities maintenance contract is vital for maintaining NASA's high standards of operational performance and scientific output.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: IAP Global Services, LLC
Address: 7315 N ATLANTIC AVE, CAPE CANAVERAL, FL, 32920
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $115,101,020
Exercised Options: $109,034,061
Current Obligation: $101,886,354
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-10-01
Current End Date: 2015-10-30
Potential End Date: 2015-12-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-01-27
More Contracts from IAP World Services, Inc.
- 200107!000106!2100!KF04 !directorate of Contracting !dakf0400c0002 !a!n!*!n!p00001 !20001222!20010930!010816486!010816486!006092860!n!johnson Controls World Service!7315 N Atlantic AVE !cape Canaveral !fl!32920!25114!071!06!fort Irwin !SAN Bernardino !california!+000002389052!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561990!*!*!3! ! !c!*!*!*!b!*!*!n!z!a !N!R!2!004!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $405.0M (Department of Defense)
- Contractor Logisitics Support E-6B — $240.0M (Department of Defense)
- Award of Satellite Communication (satcom) Support Services — $221.2M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $194.9M (Department of Defense)
- Base Operating Services — $101.0M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →