DoD's $36.5M MH-60S/R Trainer Upgrade Contract Awarded to J.F. Taylor, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $36,533,601 ($36.5M)
Contractor: J.F. Taylor, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-04-23
End Date: 2019-01-15
Contract Duration: 2,458 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: MH-60S/R MAINTENANCE TRAINERS UPGRADE
Place of Performance
Location: LEXINGTON PARK, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20653
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $36.5 million to J.F. TAYLOR, INC. for work described as: MH-60S/R MAINTENANCE TRAINERS UPGRADE Key points: 1. The contract focuses on upgrading MH-60S/R maintenance trainers, crucial for naval aviation readiness. 2. J.F. Taylor, Inc. secured the award, indicating their specialized capabilities in this niche. 3. The upgrade aims to enhance training realism and efficiency for helicopter crews. 4. This investment supports the operational effectiveness of the U.S. Navy's helicopter fleet.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award amount of $36.5M for trainer upgrades appears reasonable given the specialized nature of military simulation equipment. Benchmarking against similar complex training systems would provide further context.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' suggesting a limited competition where specific capabilities were required. This method may impact price discovery compared to broader solicitations.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used to ensure the readiness and effectiveness of naval aviation training programs.
Public Impact
Enhances pilot and crew training for critical naval helicopter operations. Supports the modernization of military training infrastructure. Contributes to the overall readiness and safety of naval aviation personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition could lead to higher costs.
- Potential for scope creep in complex upgrade projects.
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical training needs for naval aviation.
- Invests in advanced simulation technology.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the defense sector, specifically focusing on specialized training equipment. Spending on advanced simulation and training systems is a significant component of defense budgets, aimed at improving operational readiness and reducing real-world training risks.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific involvement or benefit for small businesses in this contract award. The prime contractor, J.F. Taylor, Inc., is not identified as a small business in this context.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve program managers and contracting officers ensuring performance and adherence to contract terms.
Related Government Programs
- Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may result in suboptimal pricing.
- Potential for obsolescence if technology evolves rapidly.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical training systems.
- Scope creep risk in complex upgrade projects.
Tags
other-commercial-and-service-industry-ma, department-of-defense, md, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $36.5 million to J.F. TAYLOR, INC.. MH-60S/R MAINTENANCE TRAINERS UPGRADE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is J.F. TAYLOR, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $36.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-04-23. End: 2019-01-15.
What specific technological advancements are included in this trainer upgrade, and how do they improve training effectiveness compared to previous versions?
The upgrade likely incorporates enhanced visual systems, more realistic flight dynamics modeling, and potentially integrated threat simulation capabilities. These advancements aim to provide a more immersive and accurate training environment, allowing pilots to practice a wider range of scenarios and improve decision-making skills under pressure, ultimately leading to better preparedness for real-world missions.
What were the primary reasons for excluding other sources in the competition, and how was the pricing justified?
Excluding other sources typically occurs when a specific technology, existing infrastructure integration, or unique expertise is required, possessed by only a limited number of contractors. The pricing justification would involve detailed cost proposals from bidders, reviewed against independent government cost estimates and market research to ensure reasonableness for the specialized nature of the trainers.
How will the effectiveness of these upgraded trainers be measured and validated post-delivery?
Effectiveness will be measured through a combination of technical performance metrics (e.g., system uptime, fidelity of simulation) and user feedback from pilots and instructors. Validation may involve formal testing and evaluation phases, comparing training outcomes achieved with the new trainers against established readiness benchmarks and previous training methods.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing › Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N6134011R0028
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 21610 S ESSEX DR, LEXINGTON PARK, MD, 20653
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $37,566,306
Exercised Options: $36,533,601
Current Obligation: $36,533,601
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-04-23
Current End Date: 2019-01-15
Potential End Date: 2019-01-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-07-02
More Contracts from J.F. Taylor, Inc.
- NEW Task Order — $146.1M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $137.2M (Department of Defense)
- Admin and Engineering Services in Support of Manned Flight Simulator — $116.5M (Department of Defense)
- PSC R425 - Contractor Support Services for Mission Systems Test and Evaluation Support for the Mission Systems Test and Evaluation Division of the Nawc Integrated Systems Evaluation Experimentation and Test Department — $101.9M (Department of Defense)
- NEW Task Order for to Cover the Ending Task Orders From Previous Idiq — $92.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)