DoD's $137M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to J.F. Taylor, Inc. in 2001

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $137,210,839 ($137.2M)

Contractor: J.F. Taylor, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2001-11-16

End Date: 2007-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,930 days

Daily Burn Rate: $71.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: Defense

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, ST. MARY'S County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $137.2 million to J.F. TAYLOR, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $137.2 million over its life. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of 1930 days. 4. Primarily focused on engineering services. 5. Geographically located in Maryland. 6. No specific small business set-aside noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $137.2 million over approximately 5.3 years suggests a significant investment in engineering services by the Department of the Navy. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering service contracts would be necessary to determine if the pricing was competitive. The duration of the contract indicates a long-term need for these services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely encouraged to submit proposals. This competitive process is generally expected to drive better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders and the specific evaluation criteria would provide further insight into the effectiveness of the competition in achieving optimal value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by fostering a marketplace where contractors vie for government business, potentially leading to cost savings and innovation.

Public Impact

Benefits the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, by providing essential engineering services. Supports national defense objectives through specialized engineering expertise. Likely impacts the workforce in Maryland, where the contractor is based. Services delivered are critical for the maintenance, development, or modernization of defense systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor effectiveness.
Limited information on specific engineering tasks performed.
Potential for cost overruns in long-term engineering contracts if not closely managed.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Long contract duration may indicate a stable and reliable provider of services.
Contractor is based in Maryland, potentially supporting local economic activity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector supports various government agencies, particularly in defense, infrastructure, and research and development. The market for engineering services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. The size of this contract suggests it addresses a substantial requirement for the Department of the Navy.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded under a small business set-aside. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though larger prime contracts often include provisions for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational oversight specifics are not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Engineering Contracts
Naval Engineering Support Services
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Contracts
Long-Term Government Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract duration exceeds 5 years.
No specific small business subcontracting goals mentioned.
Limited public detail on specific deliverables and performance metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $137.2 million to J.F. TAYLOR, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J.F. TAYLOR, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $137.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-11-16. End: 2007-02-28.

What specific engineering services did J.F. Taylor, Inc. provide under this contract?

The provided data categorizes this award under 'Engineering Services' (NAICS 541330) for the Department of the Navy. However, it does not detail the specific types of engineering services rendered. These could range from design and development, systems engineering, technical support, testing, or specialized consulting related to naval platforms, systems, or infrastructure. A deeper dive into contract line item numbers (CLINs) or task orders associated with this award would be necessary to ascertain the precise nature of the engineering work performed.

How does the $137.2 million contract value compare to similar engineering service contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy during that period?

Comparing the $137.2 million value requires context regarding the specific engineering domain and duration. For the period of 2001-2007, this represents a substantial contract. Large-scale engineering support for naval programs, such as shipbuilding, aircraft development, or major system upgrades, often involves contracts in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable contracts for similar services (e.g., systems engineering for naval vessels) awarded around the same time to other prime contractors or even to J.F. Taylor, Inc. itself, to assess if this award was within the expected range for the scope of work.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. Typically, such metrics are detailed within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). These would outline measurable standards for quality, timeliness, cost control, and technical performance. Without access to these contractual documents, assessing the contractor's performance against defined objectives is not possible from this data alone.

What is the track record of J.F. Taylor, Inc. with government contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense?

J.F. Taylor, Inc. has a history of receiving government contracts, primarily with the Department of Defense. This specific $137.2 million award from 2001-2007 indicates a significant engagement. Further analysis of their contract history would reveal the types of services they typically provide, their performance ratings on past contracts (if available), and their overall experience level with federal agencies. A comprehensive review would involve examining contract databases for awards, modifications, and any reported issues or accolades.

Were there any notable risks or challenges associated with this contract during its performance period?

The summary data does not explicitly list risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. However, long-term, high-value engineering contracts inherently carry risks such as scope creep, technical difficulties, schedule delays, cost overruns, and contractor performance issues. The effectiveness of risk mitigation would depend on the government's program management, oversight, and the contractor's ability to adapt and deliver. Without specific incident reports or contract modifications detailing issues, it's presumed the contract proceeded without major disruptions.

How has the Department of the Navy's spending on engineering services evolved since this contract was awarded?

Since the completion of this contract in 2007, the Department of the Navy's spending on engineering services has likely evolved significantly, influenced by technological advancements, changing defense priorities, and budget fluctuations. Modern engineering needs may involve areas like cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, advanced materials, and sustainable technologies. Analyzing subsequent contract awards for engineering services would reveal trends in spending levels, types of services procured, and the contractors involved, reflecting shifts in naval requirements and acquisition strategies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Contractor Details

Address: 21610 SOUTH ESSEX DRIVE, LEXINGTON PARK, MD, 05

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline