DoD's $15.3M IT Services Contract Awarded to Stanley Associates, Inc. in 2006

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,335,517 ($15.3M)

Contractor: Stanley Associates, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-07-21

End Date: 2011-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,836 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.3 million to STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract's duration of 1836 days (5 years) indicates a significant, long-term need for IT services. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government, but could limit flexibility. 4. The NAICS code 541519 suggests a broad range of computer-related services were procured. 5. Awarded by the Department of the Navy, this contract falls under the broader Department of Defense spending umbrella. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags warrants further investigation into subcontracting opportunities.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific service details or comparable contract data from 2006. The total award amount of $15.3 million over five years averages to approximately $3 million annually. This figure needs to be assessed against the complexity and scope of the IT services provided. Given the age of the award, current market rates for similar services would likely be different, making direct price comparisons difficult. Further analysis would require understanding the specific deliverables and performance metrics.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This typically suggests a robust bidding environment, which can lead to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government. The number of bidders is not specified, but the designation implies that the government actively sought multiple proposals to ensure a competitive outcome.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation from a wider pool of vendors.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from IT services essential for its operations. Personnel within the Navy likely received support and enhanced capabilities through these services. The contract's impact is primarily within the defense sector, supporting national security objectives. The workforce implications include the employment of IT professionals by Stanley Associates, Inc. to fulfill the contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on service scope makes it difficult to assess true value for money.
The age of the contract (awarded in 2006) limits the relevance of current market benchmarks.
No indication of small business participation or subcontracting goals.
Fixed-price contract might not accommodate unforeseen changes in IT requirements efficiently.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Long-term contract (5 years) indicates a stable, ongoing requirement met by the award.
Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty for the procuring agency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically under 'Other Computer Related Services.' The IT services market is vast and dynamic, with significant government spending allocated to support defense, intelligence, and civilian agency operations. Contracts like this are crucial for maintaining and upgrading the technological infrastructure necessary for national security and government functions. Benchmarking would involve comparing the scope and price to other IT service contracts awarded around the same period to similar defense agencies.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that this was not a small business set-aside, and the 'sb' field is false. This suggests that small businesses were not specifically targeted for this award. Without information on subcontracting plans or actual subcontracting performance, it's difficult to assess the extent to which small businesses may have participated indirectly. Further investigation into the contractor's subcontracting practices would be needed to understand the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Navy, a component of the Department of Defense. The DoD has established Inspector General offices and contracting oversight mechanisms to ensure accountability and transparency. Performance would be monitored against the contract's terms and conditions, with potential for audits and reviews. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by fixing the cost upfront.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense IT Services
Navy IT Modernization Programs
Information Technology Professional Services
Computer Systems Design Services

Risk Flags

Contract awarded over 15 years ago, limiting current relevance of pricing and technology.
Broad service category (NAICS 541519) may obscure specific performance details.
Lack of small business set-aside information requires further review for subcontracting.
No data provided on number of bidders or specific performance metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.3 million to STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-07-21. End: 2011-07-31.

What was the specific nature of the 'Other Computer Related Services' procured under this contract?

The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' is broad and can encompass a wide array of IT support functions. Without the specific contract statement of work (SOW) or task orders, it's difficult to pinpoint the exact services. However, this category typically includes services such as IT consulting, systems integration, custom software development, IT support, and network management. Given the award was to the Department of the Navy, these services likely supported naval IT infrastructure, systems, or applications, potentially including areas like cybersecurity, data management, or operational technology support.

How does the $15.3 million award compare to similar IT service contracts awarded by the Navy around 2006?

Comparing the $15.3 million award requires context regarding the contract's duration and scope. Over its 5-year period (2006-2011), the average annual value was approximately $3.06 million. In 2006, the Department of Defense, including the Navy, was heavily investing in IT modernization and C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) systems. IT service contracts of this magnitude were not uncommon for supporting complex defense systems or enterprise-wide IT functions. However, without knowing the specific services (e.g., software development, network maintenance, cybersecurity), a precise comparison to other contracts is difficult. Contracts for large-scale system integration or development would typically command higher values than routine support services.

What were the potential risks associated with a 5-year firm fixed-price IT services contract awarded in 2006?

A significant risk with a 5-year firm fixed-price IT contract awarded in 2006 is technological obsolescence. The IT landscape evolves rapidly, and services or systems defined at the outset might become outdated or less efficient over the contract's lifespan. Scope creep is another risk; if the government's needs change significantly, managing those changes under a fixed price can lead to disputes or require costly modifications. For the contractor, underestimating the effort or encountering unforeseen technical challenges could lead to reduced profit margins or even losses. For the government, the risk is receiving services that are no longer cutting-edge or fully meet evolving operational requirements by the end of the term.

What does the 'VA' (Virginia) location of the awardee, Stanley Associates, Inc., imply for this contract?

Stanley Associates, Inc. being headquartered in Virginia suggests a strong presence within the defense contracting ecosystem, as Virginia is a major hub for federal contractors, particularly those serving the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies. This proximity can facilitate communication, collaboration, and site visits between the contractor and the contracting agency (Department of the Navy). It may also indicate that the services were performed, at least in part, within the Washington D.C. metropolitan area or at naval installations located in or near Virginia. The location itself doesn't inherently affect the contract's value or performance but reflects the geographical concentration of defense-related industry.

How might the 'Other Computer Related Services' classification impact the government's ability to track performance and value?

The broad classification of 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519) can present challenges in precisely tracking performance and value if the contract doesn't include highly specific deliverables and metrics. While the firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, the government must ensure that the services rendered align with the intended outcomes and evolving needs. Effective tracking relies heavily on well-defined performance work statements (PWS), key performance indicators (KPIs), and regular reporting from the contractor. Without granular detail on the specific tasks performed under this broad category, assessing the government's return on investment and the contractor's precise contribution can be more complex than for narrowly defined service contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CGI Inc (UEI: 248513116)

Address: 3101 WILSON BLVD STE 700, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F5900H

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline