DoD awards $5.27M cybersecurity contract to ACCELGOV LLC for engineering services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $5,271,481 ($5.3M)
Contractor: Accelgov LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-02-15
End Date: 2026-05-20
Contract Duration: 1,190 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 18
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: CYBERSECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (CSS)
Place of Performance
Location: ALBANY, DOUGHERTY County, GEORGIA, 31704
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $5.3 million to ACCELGOV LLC for work described as: CYBERSECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (CSS) Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1190 days indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The award is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 points to engineering services. 6. The contract is for cybersecurity support services, a critical area for defense.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $5.27 million over approximately 3.3 years averages to about $1.6 million annually. Without specific benchmarks for cybersecurity engineering services for the Department of the Navy, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for the government when scope is well-defined, as it caps potential cost overruns. Further analysis would require comparison to similar contracts awarded by the DoD or other agencies for comparable services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bids received (18) suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. A competitive process like this generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation among bidders.
Public Impact
The Department of the Navy benefits from enhanced cybersecurity capabilities to protect its digital assets and operations. The contract supports the delivery of essential cybersecurity engineering services, crucial for national defense. The primary geographic impact is likely within the operational areas of the Department of the Navy, potentially worldwide. The contract supports a workforce skilled in cybersecurity and engineering, contributing to the defense industrial base.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if cybersecurity needs evolve significantly beyond the initial contract definition.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical cybersecurity functions could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type aligns incentives and manages cost risk for the government.
- Long contract duration suggests a stable, ongoing need for these critical services.
Sector Analysis
Cybersecurity is a rapidly growing sector within the broader IT and defense industries, driven by increasing digital threats. The market for cybersecurity services is substantial, with government agencies being major consumers. This contract fits within the defense sector's need for specialized engineering support to maintain and enhance its cyber defenses. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to pinpoint without more specific service details, but the overall federal spending on cybersecurity continues to rise.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, ACCELGOV LLC, presumably a large business given the contract value and nature of services, is the prime contractor. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this specific delivery order, which could be a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, there may be established oversight mechanisms for that vehicle. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Cybersecurity Initiatives
- Navy Information Technology Support Contracts
- Federal Cybersecurity Services Procurement
Risk Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized.
- Dependence on contractor expertise for critical security functions.
Tags
cybersecurity, engineering-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, accelgov-llc, naics-541330, georgia, large-business
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $5.3 million to ACCELGOV LLC. CYBERSECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (CSS)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ACCELGOV LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $5.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-02-15. End: 2026-05-20.
What is ACCELGOV LLC's track record with the federal government, particularly in cybersecurity and engineering services?
A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess ACCELGOV LLC's track record. Key indicators would include the number and value of previous federal contracts awarded to the company, the agencies they have served, and the types of services rendered. Performance ratings from past contracts (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would provide crucial insights into their reliability, quality of work, and adherence to schedules and budgets. Specific experience in cybersecurity engineering, especially within the defense sector, would be a significant factor in evaluating their suitability for this $5.27 million contract.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar cybersecurity engineering support services?
Benchmarking this contract's price against market rates requires detailed analysis of the specific services provided, the required skill sets, and the geographic location of performance. Industry reports on cybersecurity consulting and engineering fees, along with data from similar government contracts (if publicly available), can serve as comparison points. Factors such as the level of security clearance required, the complexity of the systems supported, and the urgency of the need can influence pricing. Without more granular data on the scope of work and labor categories, a precise comparison is difficult, but the firm-fixed-price nature suggests the government sought a defined cost.
What are the primary risks associated with this cybersecurity support contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks include potential technical failures in cybersecurity solutions, contractor performance issues, evolving threat landscapes rendering current solutions obsolete, and data breaches. Mitigation strategies often involve robust contract language, performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and contingency planning. The firm-fixed-price structure mitigates financial risk for the government, while the full and open competition aims to select a capable provider. The Department of the Navy's oversight and the contractor's own quality assurance processes are critical for managing performance and technical risks.
How effective is the current cybersecurity posture of the Department of the Navy, and how does this contract contribute to its improvement?
Assessing the overall effectiveness of the Navy's cybersecurity posture is complex and involves numerous factors beyond this single contract. This contract specifically addresses the need for engineering support to bolster cybersecurity capabilities. It likely contributes by providing specialized expertise for designing, implementing, or maintaining security systems, responding to threats, or ensuring compliance with security protocols. The effectiveness will depend on the quality of services delivered by ACCELGOV LLC and how well these services integrate with the Navy's broader cybersecurity strategy and existing infrastructure.
What has been the historical spending trend for cybersecurity engineering services within the Department of the Navy?
Historical spending on cybersecurity engineering services within the Department of the Navy has generally trended upwards over the past decade, reflecting the increasing reliance on digital systems and the escalating sophistication of cyber threats. Agencies like the Navy consistently allocate significant portions of their IT and defense budgets to cybersecurity. Analyzing specific spending data over several fiscal years would reveal the growth trajectory, identify major contract vehicles used, and highlight key service areas that have received the most investment. This trend underscores the sustained importance and growing demand for such services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - SECURITY AND COMPLIANCE
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: M6700423R3002
Offers Received: 18
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6701 DEMOCRACY BLVD STE 555, BETHESDA, MD, 20817
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $9,407,110
Exercised Options: $5,355,216
Current Obligation: $5,271,481
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017821D8883
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-02-15
Current End Date: 2026-05-20
Potential End Date: 2027-11-20 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-12
More Contracts from Accelgov LLC
- Nittss First BPA Order- Program Management and Quality Control and Operations and Maintenance Support — $29.0M (National Archives and Records Administration)
- This Task Order IS for Information Technology (IT) Services in Support of the Facilities Systems Branch (FSB) — $20.4M (Department of Defense)
- National Defense University (NDU) Enterprise IT Services Support (eits) (NDU Eits) — $10.6M (Department of Defense)
- DNA Unified Communnications IT Support — $8.1M (Department of Defense)
- FWS DIV of Bgt&techl Spprt - Ecos O&M Services — $2.1M (Department of the Interior)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)