DoD's NDU EITS contract awarded to ACCELGOV LLC for over $10.5M, with 5 bidders

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,589,101 ($10.6M)

Contractor: Accelgov LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-05-01

End Date: 2027-01-27

Contract Duration: 1,001 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY (NDU) ENTERPRISE IT SERVICES SUPPORT (EITS) (NDU EITS)

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20319

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.6 million to ACCELGOV LLC for work described as: NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY (NDU) ENTERPRISE IT SERVICES SUPPORT (EITS) (NDU EITS) Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the competitive nature of the award. 2. Competition dynamics show a healthy level of interest with 5 bidders. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a firm-fixed-price contract type mitigating cost overruns. 4. Performance context is within enterprise IT services support for a defense institution. 5. Sector positioning is within IT services for the defense industry.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of approximately $10.6 million over its period of performance suggests a moderate investment in enterprise IT services. Benchmarking against similar IT support contracts within the Department of Defense is challenging without more granular data on service scope and duration. However, the firm-fixed-price contract type indicates a commitment to cost control by the government, which is a positive sign for value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple potential offerors were solicited. The presence of five bidders suggests a reasonably competitive environment for this type of IT service. A higher number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The National Defense University (NDU) will benefit from enhanced enterprise IT services. Services delivered include IT support crucial for the functioning of a key defense educational institution. The geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia, where NDU is located. Workforce implications may include the need for skilled IT professionals to fulfill the contract requirements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical IT infrastructure.
Risk of scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type helps control costs.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Multiple bidders indicate market interest and potential for quality service.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader IT services sector, specifically focusing on enterprise IT support. The market for IT services supporting government agencies is substantial, with significant spending allocated to maintaining and upgrading technological infrastructure. This contract represents a portion of the Department of Defense's overall IT expenditure, aiming to ensure the operational efficiency of the National Defense University.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited based on this award alone. Further analysis of the prime contractor's subcontracting plan would be necessary to determine any indirect benefits to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to meet defined deliverables within budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

DoD Enterprise IT Services
Defense Information Systems Agency Contracts
National Defense University IT Support
IT Services for Educational Institutions
Federal IT Infrastructure Support

Risk Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in
Cybersecurity risks
Dependence on contractor performance

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.6 million to ACCELGOV LLC. NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY (NDU) ENTERPRISE IT SERVICES SUPPORT (EITS) (NDU EITS)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ACCELGOV LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-05-01. End: 2027-01-27.

What is the track record of ACCELGOV LLC in performing similar IT support contracts for the federal government?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that ACCELGOV LLC has been awarded multiple contracts for IT services. While specific details on past performance for enterprise IT support at the scale of NDU EITS would require deeper analysis of contract histories and performance reviews, the company's presence in the federal IT contracting space suggests some level of established capability. Further investigation into past contract awards, including their value, duration, and any reported performance issues or commendations, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record. Examining past performance evaluations, if publicly accessible, would offer direct insights into their reliability and effectiveness in delivering IT services.

How does the awarded price compare to similar enterprise IT support contracts within the Department of Defense?

Directly comparing the awarded price of $10.59 million for the NDU EITS contract to similar DoD contracts is challenging without a standardized benchmark for 'enterprise IT services support.' The scope, complexity, and duration of services can vary significantly. However, the fact that this contract was awarded under full and open competition with five bidders suggests that the pricing achieved is likely competitive within the market for such services. To conduct a more precise comparison, one would need to identify contracts with comparable service level agreements, technical requirements, and contract lengths within the DoD or other federal agencies. Analyzing the per-unit cost or cost-per-service metric, if available, would also aid in benchmarking.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance issues by the contractor, the possibility of scope creep leading to cost overruns (though mitigated by the firm-fixed-price structure), and cybersecurity vulnerabilities inherent in IT systems. Mitigation strategies include the firm-fixed-price contract type, which places the cost risk on the contractor. Additionally, the government will likely employ robust oversight mechanisms, including regular performance reviews, service level agreement monitoring, and defined acceptance criteria for deliverables. Cybersecurity risks are typically addressed through stringent security requirements outlined in the contract and ongoing monitoring by the agency's security personnel.

How effective is the current IT support structure at NDU in meeting its educational and research objectives?

Assessing the effectiveness of the current IT support structure at NDU in meeting its educational and research objectives requires qualitative and quantitative data that is not directly provided by this contract award. The contract's purpose is to procure IT services, implying a need for such support. The effectiveness would be measured by factors such as system uptime, user satisfaction, responsiveness to IT issues, availability of necessary software and hardware, and the ability of the IT infrastructure to support advanced research and distance learning. The success of this contract in fulfilling its objectives will ultimately contribute to NDU's overall effectiveness.

What has been the historical spending trend for enterprise IT services at the National Defense University?

Historical spending data for enterprise IT services specifically at the National Defense University is not detailed in the provided information. This contract represents a new award for NDU EITS. To understand historical trends, one would need to access broader DoD or NDU budget allocations for IT services over previous fiscal years. Analyzing past contracts for similar IT support functions, even if under different names or with different contractors, would be necessary to identify any patterns in spending, contract values, and the duration of such support services at the institution.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the broader IT services market within the defense sector?

This contract, valued at over $10.5 million, contributes to the overall spending within the defense IT services market. The award to ACCELGOV LLC, following a competitive process, signals continued demand for enterprise IT support within defense educational institutions. It reinforces the market position of companies capable of delivering such services and may influence pricing and service offerings from competitors. The success of this contract could also lead to future opportunities for ACCELGOV LLC or other firms in similar niches within the defense sector, potentially driving innovation and efficiency in IT service delivery.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: HC102815R0030

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6701 DEMOCRACY BLVD, BETHESDA, MD, 20817

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $41,552,130

Exercised Options: $14,814,224

Current Obligation: $10,589,101

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC102818D0035

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline