HUD's $27.6M accounting services contract awarded to Williams, Adley & Company LLP shows fair value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,603,236 ($27.6M)

Contractor: Williams, Adley & Company DC LLP

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2011-09-30

End Date: 2016-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS SERVICE FOR FHA

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20410, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $27.6 million to WILLIAMS, ADLEY & COMPANY DC LLP for work described as: ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS SERVICE FOR FHA Key points: 1. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The contractor, Williams, Adley & Company LLP, has a track record with federal agencies. 3. The contract duration of approximately five years suggests a stable, long-term need for these services. 4. The service falls under accounting and financial operations, a critical support function for government agencies. 5. The contract's value is moderate within the context of federal IT and professional services spending. 6. The award was made by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), a primary user of such services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $27.6 million over five years for accounting and financial operations services appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar professional services contracts. While specific per-unit cost data is not provided, the overall award amount suggests a competitive pricing structure given the scope of work. The contractor's experience likely contributed to a fair valuation. Without direct comparisons to identical services from other agencies or more granular cost breakdowns, a definitive 'excellent' rating is not possible, but the value seems sound.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of nine bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this accounting and financial operations service. A competitive environment generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government. The exclusion of sources clause might indicate specific requirements that narrowed the initial pool, but the overall competition appears robust.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely drove down costs and ensured the government received competitive pricing for essential accounting services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which receives essential accounting and financial operations support. The services delivered ensure the accurate management of financial data, compliance with regulations, and efficient operational support for HUD programs. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the contractor is based and services are likely performed. The contract supports professional jobs within the accounting and financial services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically accounting and auditing services (NAICS 541211). The federal government is a significant consumer of such services to manage its complex financial operations, ensure compliance, and support program delivery. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of providing specialized expertise. This contract represents a moderate investment within the broader landscape of federal professional services spending, which often runs into billions annually across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Williams, Adley & Company LLP, is likely responsible for fulfilling the contract requirements directly. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans with small businesses. The absence of set-aside provisions means that large businesses or established firms are the primary focus for this type of specialized service, potentially limiting direct opportunities for small businesses in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program officials within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract's execution.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

professional-services, accounting, financial-operations, hud, department-of-housing-and-urban-development, full-and-open-competition, district-of-columbia, labor-hours, professional-services-schedule, medium-value-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $27.6 million to WILLIAMS, ADLEY & COMPANY DC LLP. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS SERVICE FOR FHA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WILLIAMS, ADLEY & COMPANY DC LLP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-09-30. End: 2016-09-29.

What is the track record of Williams, Adley & Company LLP with federal contracts, particularly with HUD?

Williams, Adley & Company LLP has a history of federal contract awards. While this specific contract with HUD is for accounting and financial operations, their federal portfolio likely includes other professional services. Analyzing their past performance ratings, any past performance issues or commendations, and the types of agencies they have served would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and expertise. For this particular contract, the award itself suggests they met the qualifications and competitive requirements set forth by HUD. Further investigation into their specific experience with similar accounting and financial management tasks for government entities would be beneficial for a comprehensive assessment of their track record.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar accounting services procured by other federal agencies?

The total contract value of $27.6 million over approximately five years, averaging around $5.5 million annually, places this contract in the mid-range for specialized professional services. To benchmark effectively, one would compare this to contracts for similar accounting, auditing, and financial advisory services procured by agencies of comparable size and complexity, such as GSA, Treasury, or other housing finance authorities. Factors like the specific scope of work (e.g., audit support, financial system implementation, routine accounting), geographic location, and the level of competition influence pricing. Without access to detailed cost breakdowns or direct comparisons of identical service scopes, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents 'excellent' or 'fair' value, but it appears within a reasonable range for the described services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, leading to disruptions in HUD's financial operations. Another risk is the potential for cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond initial estimates or if unforeseen complexities arise. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for critical functions can pose a continuity risk. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by HUD officials, clearly defined performance metrics and service level agreements (SLAs), regular performance reviews, and contingency planning. The contract's structure, including payment milestones tied to performance, also serves as a risk mitigation tool, incentivizing the contractor to meet obligations.

How effective has Williams, Adley & Company LLP been in delivering accounting and financial operations services under this contract?

Assessing the effectiveness requires access to performance reports, client feedback, and potentially data on the accuracy and timeliness of financial operations managed under this contract. As this contract was awarded in 2011 and concluded in 2016, historical performance data would be available through government contract databases or agency records. Without direct access to this specific performance data, we infer effectiveness from the contract's successful completion and the absence of widely reported issues. The fact that it was a competitive award and likely fulfilled its term suggests a baseline level of effectiveness, but a detailed analysis would necessitate reviewing specific performance metrics and outcomes.

What are the historical spending patterns for accounting and financial operations services at HUD?

HUD, like many large federal agencies, consistently requires significant spending on accounting and financial operations to manage its diverse programs, including housing assistance, mortgage insurance, and community development. Historical spending patterns would reveal trends in the volume and value of contracts awarded for these services, the types of services most frequently procured (e.g., auditing, financial system support, transactional accounting), and the primary contracting vehicles used (e.g., full and open, sole source, GSA schedules). Analyzing these patterns over several years would indicate whether spending on such services has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether HUD relies more on internal staff or external contractors for these functions.

What is the typical duration and value for similar accounting service contracts within the federal government?

Federal contracts for professional services like accounting and financial operations often have durations ranging from one to five years, with options for extensions. The total value can vary significantly based on the agency's size, the complexity of its financial operations, and the specific services required. Contracts can range from a few hundred thousand dollars for specialized support to tens or hundreds of millions for comprehensive financial management services for large departments. The $27.6 million contract awarded to Williams, Adley & Company LLP over five years aligns with the typical scale for significant, long-term accounting support services for a federal agency like HUD.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAccounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll ServicesOffices of Certified Public Accountants

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1030 15TH STREET, NW, SUITE 350 WEST, WASHINGTON, DC, 20005

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,603,236

Exercised Options: $27,603,236

Current Obligation: $27,603,236

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-09-30

Current End Date: 2016-09-29

Potential End Date: 2016-09-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-09-14

More Contracts from Williams, Adley & Company DC LLP

View all Williams, Adley & Company DC LLP federal contracts →

Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts

View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending