DoD's USTRANSCOM spent over $32.7M on ADP Systems Analysis Services, awarded to CSC Information Systems LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,786,164 ($32.8M)

Contractor: Csra Information Systems LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-01

End Date: 2008-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $29.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200605!600003!9700!HTC711!US TRANSPORTATION COMMAND !GS35F4639H !C!N! !Y!HTC71106F0001! !20051001!20060930!078351306!003242013!009581091!N!CSC INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC !15000 CONFERENCE CENTER DR!CHANTILLY !VA!20151!68328!163!17!SCOTT AFB !ST. CLAIR !ILLINOIS !+000007390132!N!N!000000000000!D306!ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541511!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!E!Y! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !9700!F3ST95!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SCOTT AFB, ST. CLAIR County, ILLINOIS, 62225

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $32.8 million to CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC for work described as: 200605!600003!9700!HTC711!US TRANSPORTATION COMMAND !GS35F4639H !C!N! !Y!HTC71106F0001! !20051001!20060930!078351306!003242013!009581091!N!CSC INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC !15000 CONFERENCE CENTER DR!CHANTILLY !VA!20151!68328!163!17!SCOTT AFB !ST. … Key points: 1. Contract value of $32.7M for ADP Systems Analysis Services represents a significant investment in IT support. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Performance period from October 2005 to September 2008 indicates a medium-term engagement for services. 4. The primary service category is Custom Computer Programming Services, aligning with IT infrastructure needs. 5. Awardee CSC Information Systems LLC has a track record in government contracting, requiring performance evaluation. 6. The contract's geographic focus is Scott AFB, Illinois, highlighting a specific operational base. 7. A significant portion of the contract value was obligated, indicating active utilization of services. 8. The contract was not set aside for small businesses, suggesting larger prime contractors were involved.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $32.7M for ADP Systems Analysis Services over approximately three years (1095 days) suggests an average annual spend of roughly $10.9M. Benchmarking this against similar IT services contracts requires detailed analysis of scope, duration, and specific deliverables. Without more granular data on the services provided and market rates for comparable custom computer programming, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the total obligated amount of $29,942,000 indicates that a substantial portion of the awarded value was utilized, suggesting the services were deemed necessary and delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated in the provided data, but the designation implies a competitive process designed to solicit the best offers. This approach is generally favored for ensuring fair pricing and access to a wide range of capabilities. The competition level suggests that the government sought to leverage market forces to achieve favorable terms and pricing for these critical ADP systems analysis services.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve the quality of services received. It ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, increasing the likelihood of obtaining services at a fair market price.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM), which received ADP Systems Analysis Services to support its operations. The services delivered likely involved enhancing or maintaining the command's automated data processing systems, crucial for logistical and operational efficiency. The geographic impact is centered around Scott Air Force Base in Illinois, where USTRANSCOM is headquartered. Workforce implications could include the employment of IT professionals, analysts, and programmers by the contractor, CSC Information Systems LLC, to fulfill the contract requirements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurred without adequate change control.
Risk of vendor lock-in if proprietary systems or processes were developed.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical ADP systems analysis could pose a continuity risk.
Performance quality hinges on the contractor's ability to meet evolving technological demands.
Ensuring data security and integrity throughout the contract lifecycle is paramount.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing structure.
The contract was awarded to CSC Information Systems LLC, a known entity in government IT services.
A significant portion of the contract value was obligated, indicating active use and perceived value of services.
The contract duration allowed for a sustained period of support and development.
The specific service code (541511) points to a defined area of expertise, potentially leading to specialized skill application.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically under Custom Computer Programming Services (NAICS code 541511). The IT services market for the federal government is substantial, with significant spending on software development, system integration, and IT support. USTRANSCOM's need for ADP Systems Analysis Services is indicative of the broader government reliance on robust IT infrastructure to manage complex operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing IT service contracts of similar scope and duration awarded to large IT service providers within the Department of Defense and other federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SB is 'N'). This suggests that the contract was likely awarded to a large prime contractor, and there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. Without specific subcontracting plans or data, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem. However, large IT service contracts often involve a tiered subcontracting structure where small businesses can play a vital role in delivering specialized services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) contracting office and program managers. Accountability measures would include performance reviews, milestone tracking, and adherence to contract terms and conditions. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS-NG (where this data originates), which provides public access to contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected or identified during the contract's performance or closeout.

Related Government Programs

DoD IT Modernization Programs
USTRANSCOM Logistics IT Support
Federal Civilian IT Services
Custom Software Development Contracts
ADP Systems Management

Risk Flags

Contract Performance Risk
Vendor Lock-in Potential
Data Security and Integrity
Dependency on Contractor Expertise
Scope Creep Management

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $32.8 million to CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC. 200605!600003!9700!HTC711!US TRANSPORTATION COMMAND !GS35F4639H !C!N! !Y!HTC71106F0001! !20051001!20060930!078351306!003242013!009581091!N!CSC INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC !15000 CONFERENCE CENTER DR!CHANTILLY !VA!20151!68328!163!17!SCOTT AFB !ST. CLAIR !ILLINOIS !+000007390132!N!N!000000000000!D306!ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541511!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (USTRANSCOM).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-01. End: 2008-09-30.

What was the specific nature of the 'ADP Systems Analysis Services' provided under this contract?

The provided data identifies the service as 'ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES' under NAICS code 541511 (Custom Computer Programming Services). While the exact deliverables are not detailed, this typically involves analyzing, designing, developing, and implementing automated data processing systems. Services could include requirements gathering, system architecture design, software coding, testing, integration, and maintenance. For USTRANSCOM, these services likely supported critical logistics, command and control, or operational planning systems, ensuring their efficiency, reliability, and alignment with military needs during the 2005-2008 period.

How does the awarded value of $32.7M compare to similar IT services contracts for the Department of Defense during that period?

Comparing the $32.7M contract value requires context regarding the specific services, duration, and complexity. During the mid-2000s, the Department of Defense (DoD) awarded numerous large IT contracts, many exceeding this amount, particularly for enterprise-wide systems, cybersecurity, and major platform development. Contracts for custom programming and systems analysis, while critical, could range significantly. A $32.7M contract over three years ($10.9M annually) is substantial but not exceptionally large within the DoD's overall IT spending landscape. Benchmarking would necessitate identifying contracts with similar NAICS codes, agencies, and contract types to ascertain if the pricing was competitive for the scope of work.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate CSC Information Systems LLC's performance?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate CSC Information Systems LLC's performance. In standard government contracting, performance is typically assessed against criteria outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW). These often include metrics related to timeliness of delivery, quality of work (e.g., defect rates, system uptime), adherence to budget, customer satisfaction, and achievement of specific technical objectives. For ADP Systems Analysis, KPIs might involve system performance improvements, successful deployment of new features, or reduction in system errors. Formal reviews and acceptance of deliverables would form the basis of performance evaluation.

What is the historical spending trend for ADP Systems Analysis Services at USTRANSCOM before and after this contract?

The provided data only details this specific contract (HTC71106F0001) awarded in 2005. To determine historical spending trends for ADP Systems Analysis Services at USTRANSCOM, a broader analysis of contract data from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or similar sources would be necessary. This would involve querying for contracts with the same agency (USTRANSCOM), relevant service codes (like 541511), and potentially keywords related to 'ADP Systems Analysis' over multiple fiscal years. Without this broader dataset, it's impossible to establish pre- and post-contract spending patterns or identify trends in this specific service category for USTRANSCOM.

Were there any notable challenges or disputes encountered during the performance of this contract?

The provided data does not contain information regarding specific challenges, disputes, or contract modifications for HTC71106F0001. Government contract performance can sometimes involve issues such as scope changes, technical difficulties, or disagreements over deliverables. Such events are often documented through contract modification orders (which would show changes in value or period of performance) or through contract dispute resolution processes. The absence of readily available data on disputes does not guarantee a smooth performance history, but it means that any significant issues were either resolved without formal dispute or are not publicly detailed in this summary dataset.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 15000 CONFERENCE CENTER D, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F4639H

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline