DoD's $52.9M IT contract with CSRA Information Systems LLC awarded in 1999, spanning over 8 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $52,940,124 ($52.9M)

Contractor: Csra Information Systems LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 1999-10-01

End Date: 2008-06-23

Contract Duration: 3,188 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: IT

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $52.9 million to CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $52.9M over 8 years suggests a moderate annual spend, requiring careful performance monitoring. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of over 8 years presents potential risks related to technology obsolescence and evolving requirements. 4. Performance context is IT services for the Defense Information Systems Agency, a critical function within DoD. 5. Sector positioning is within the IT services domain, a large and dynamic market for federal contractors.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total contract value of $52.9M over nearly 9 years averages to approximately $6.6M annually. Without specific details on the services rendered, it's challenging to benchmark against similar contracts. However, the duration suggests a need for robust contract management to ensure continued value and prevent cost overruns due to scope creep or outdated technology. The absence of detailed performance metrics makes a definitive value assessment difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. With 2 bids received, the level of competition was limited but present. This indicates that while there was some price discovery, the limited number of bidders might have influenced the final pricing and terms compared to a scenario with more robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process, even with a limited number of bidders, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging more favorable pricing and terms than a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its components, receiving essential IT services. Services delivered likely include IT support, system maintenance, and potentially network infrastructure management. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of Defense's operational areas, likely global. Workforce implications include employment for IT professionals within CSRA Information Systems LLC and potentially its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration increases risk of technology obsolescence and potential for cost increases due to evolving requirements.
Limited number of bids (2) may indicate potential barriers to entry for other qualified vendors or a lack of market interest.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's effectiveness and value for money over time.
The contract was awarded in 1999, and its performance period extended to 2008; current relevance and technology may be outdated.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent initial procurement process.
The contract provided sustained IT support to a critical defense agency over an extended period.
A single award contract can foster a strong working relationship and specialized knowledge development.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services from hardware maintenance to software development and network management. The federal IT services market is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense being major consumers. This contract likely represents a portion of the DoD's overall IT spending, aimed at ensuring the operational readiness and efficiency of its information systems.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information on subcontracting plans. The contractor, CSRA Information Systems LLC, is a large entity. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless significant subcontracting opportunities were created, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically involve contract officers, contracting specialists, and program managers within the Defense Information Systems Agency. Accountability measures would be tied to performance metrics and delivery schedules outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Defense Information Systems Agency IT Support Services
Department of Defense IT Modernization Programs
Federal Civilian IT Services Contracts
IT Services for National Security Agencies

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may lead to technology obsolescence.
Limited competition (2 bidders) could impact price competitiveness.
Lack of detailed performance data hinders value assessment.
Contract awarded in 1999, technology and needs may have significantly evolved.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $52.9 million to CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $52.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1999-10-01. End: 2008-06-23.

What specific IT services were provided under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact IT services rendered under this contract. However, given the awardee (CSRA Information Systems LLC) and the agency (Defense Information Systems Agency - DISA), it is highly probable that the services encompassed a range of IT support functions. These could include help desk support, network operations and maintenance, system administration, cybersecurity services, software development or maintenance, and potentially infrastructure management. DISA is responsible for providing, operating, and defending information systems for the DoD, so the contract likely supported these critical functions.

How does the annual value of this contract compare to similar IT support contracts awarded by DoD around 1999?

The contract's total value of approximately $52.9 million over nearly 9 years equates to an average annual value of roughly $6.6 million. Benchmarking this requires access to historical contract data for similar IT support services awarded by the DoD during that period. Without such comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state whether this represents a high, low, or average annual spend. Factors like the scope of services, geographic coverage, and specific technological requirements would heavily influence comparisons. Generally, IT support for a major defense agency could command significant funding, but the exact value relative to peers would need detailed analysis of comparable contracts.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) for this contract?

The provided data does not include information on the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) that were part of this contract. Typically, IT service contracts of this nature would include metrics related to system uptime, response times for issue resolution, security compliance, and project delivery timelines. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it impossible to assess the contractor's performance against defined standards or to evaluate the effectiveness of the services provided.

What is the track record of CSRA Information Systems LLC with DoD contracts of similar size and scope?

CSRA Information Systems LLC (and its predecessor/successor entities) has a significant history of contracting with the Department of Defense. While this specific contract was awarded in 1999, the company has consistently been a major IT service provider to the DoD across various programs and agencies. Their track record generally involves large-scale IT support, system integration, and modernization efforts. Assessing their performance on this particular contract would require reviewing specific performance evaluations and award histories related to this $52.9M award. Generally, large contractors like CSRA have extensive experience but also face scrutiny over performance and cost-effectiveness across their portfolio.

Were there any contract modifications or change orders issued during the life of this contract, and what was their impact?

The provided summary data does not detail any contract modifications or change orders that may have been issued during the contract's lifespan from October 1, 1999, to June 23, 2008. Such modifications are common in long-term IT contracts to adapt to evolving technological needs, changing requirements, or scope adjustments. If significant modifications occurred, they could have impacted the total contract value, duration, and the services delivered. Without this information, a complete understanding of the contract's evolution and final outcomes is not possible.

What was the rationale for awarding this contract to CSRA Information Systems LLC under full and open competition with only two bids?

The rationale for awarding this contract under full and open competition with only two bids likely stems from the specific requirements of the solicitation and the market landscape at the time. Agencies are mandated to promote full and open competition whenever possible. However, the number of bids received can be influenced by factors such as the complexity of the requirement, the technical expertise needed, the contract value, and the number of capable vendors in the market. It's possible that only two companies possessed the necessary qualifications and capacity to meet DISA's needs for these specific IT services in 1999. The agency would have documented the justification for proceeding with the award based on the bids received.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 15000 CONFERENCE CENTER D, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DCA20099D5011

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline