HHS Awards $10.5M for State Systems Technical Review Project to JBS International, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,525,208 ($10.5M)

Contractor: JBS International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2005-06-15

End Date: 2011-01-31

Contract Duration: 2,056 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: STATE SYSTEMS TECHNICAL REVIEW PROJECT

Place of Performance

Location: SILVER SPRING, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20910

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $10.5 million to JBS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: STATE SYSTEMS TECHNICAL REVIEW PROJECT Key points: 1. The contract value is $10.5 million over its duration. 2. JBS International, Inc. is the sole awardee. 3. The contract spans over 5 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The sector appears to be healthcare IT or public health services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Without specific performance metrics and benchmarks, assessing the value for money is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This was a competitive delivery order, suggesting some level of competition existed, but the specifics of the competition are not detailed. The pricing mechanism (Cost Plus Award Fee) can incentivize cost increases if award criteria are not strictly defined.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for this project. The effectiveness of the spending depends on the quality of the technical review and its impact on state systems.

Public Impact

Impacts state-level substance abuse and mental health systems. Potential for improved service delivery through technical reviews. Funds allocated to a private contractor for government services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee contract type
Long contract duration
Limited details on competition

Positive Signals

Addresses critical public health systems
Competitive delivery order

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the healthcare sector, specifically focusing on IT systems supporting substance abuse and mental health services. Spending benchmarks for similar technical review projects are not readily available without more specific service definitions.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would be crucial for a Cost Plus Award Fee contract to ensure performance targets are met and costs are controlled. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is responsible for this oversight.

Related Government Programs

Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Contract duration is long (over 5 years).
Contract type (Cost Plus Award Fee) can lead to cost overruns.
Limited transparency on the competitive process.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
No clear indication of small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $10.5 million to JBS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. STATE SYSTEMS TECHNICAL REVIEW PROJECT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JBS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-06-15. End: 2011-01-31.

What specific technical reviews were conducted, and what was their measurable impact on state systems?

The data does not specify the exact nature of the technical reviews. To assess value, one would need to examine the project's deliverables, such as reports, recommendations, and implemented changes, and correlate them with improvements in state system efficiency, effectiveness, or compliance.

What were the key performance indicators used to determine the 'award fee' in this Cost Plus Award Fee contract?

The specific performance indicators for the award fee are not provided in the data. Typically, these would relate to the quality of deliverables, timeliness, adherence to scope, and overall client satisfaction. Without these, it's difficult to judge if the contractor was appropriately incentivized for exceptional performance.

How did the competitive delivery order process ensure the best possible price and quality for these technical review services?

While labeled 'competitive,' the details of the competition are absent. A competitive delivery order implies multiple bids were solicited, but the extent of the competition and the evaluation criteria are unknown. This lack of transparency makes it hard to confirm if the chosen contractor offered the best value.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8630 FENTON ST STE 1200, SILVER SPRING, MD, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,525,208

Exercised Options: $10,525,208

Current Obligation: $10,525,208

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 270031000

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline