DoD awards $14.9M for engineering and PMO support to Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,923,232 ($14.9M)

Contractor: Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-05-01

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: JWCC ENGINEERING AND PMO SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.9 million to CHICKASAW STRATEGIC POINTE, LLC for work described as: JWCC ENGINEERING AND PMO SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1095 days indicates a medium-term need for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictability. 4. The award is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 5. The contractor, Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC, is a relatively new entity in federal contracting. 6. The services fall under Computer Systems Design, a common category for IT support.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.9 million over three years for engineering and PMO support appears within a reasonable range for similar IT services contracts. However, without specific details on the scope of work and deliverables, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against other contracts for similar services from the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) would provide better context. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which indicates that while the competition was open, certain sources were initially excluded, but ultimately the award was made through a broad competitive process. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition was intended, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government receives services at a fair market price, driven by multiple offers rather than a sole-source negotiation.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from enhanced engineering and program management support. Services delivered are expected to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of defense IT projects. The primary geographic impact is likely within the operational areas of the Defense Information Systems Agency. The contract supports specialized IT and project management roles, potentially impacting the federal IT workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited public information on the contractor's past performance and capacity for a contract of this size.
The specific scope of 'engineering and PMO support' is broad and could lead to scope creep if not tightly managed.
Reliance on a single delivery order under a potentially larger IDIQ could concentrate risk if the IDIQ itself has issues.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market was accessed.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract duration allows for sustained support and project continuity.

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector within the federal government is vast, with significant spending on system design, integration, and program management. This contract for engineering and PMO support fits within the broader category of IT consulting and professional services. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar IT support contracts awarded by DISA or other defense agencies would typically range from several million to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a primary driver for this award, as the 'small business' flag is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements in the provided data. This suggests that the primary awardee is likely a large business, and the impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether the prime contractor engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's performance work statement (PWS) and delivery terms. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, though detailed performance metrics and oversight reports are often internal or classified. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) IT Support Contracts
Department of Defense Program Management Support
Federal IT Engineering Services
Computer Systems Design Services

Risk Flags

Contractor Performance Risk (due to limited public track record)
Scope Definition and Management Risk
Potential for Unforeseen Technical Challenges

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.9 million to CHICKASAW STRATEGIC POINTE, LLC. JWCC ENGINEERING AND PMO SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHICKASAW STRATEGIC POINTE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-05-01. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the specific scope of 'engineering and PMO support' covered by this contract?

The provided data abbreviates the contract description as 'JWCC ENGINEERING AND PMO SUPPORT'. While 'PMO' typically refers to Program Management Office, and 'engineering' suggests technical design and development, the precise deliverables, technical requirements, and specific engineering disciplines (e.g., software, hardware, systems) are not detailed in the summary. This level of detail is usually found in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW) associated with the contract. Understanding the specific tasks, such as system architecture design, lifecycle management, risk assessment, requirements analysis, or project planning and execution, is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of the contract's value and performance.

How does the $14.9 million value compare to similar DISA engineering and PMO support contracts?

Benchmarking the $14.9 million value requires comparing it against contracts with similar scopes, durations, and agencies. DISA frequently awards large IT support contracts. For a three-year period (1095 days), $14.9 million equates to approximately $4.97 million per year. This annual figure is moderate for specialized IT engineering and PMO support within a major defense agency. Contracts for similar services can range from a few million to tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scale of programs supported, the level of expertise required, and the number of personnel involved. Without access to the specific PWS and a detailed market analysis of comparable DISA contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or questionable value, but it falls within a plausible range for such services.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate contractor performance?

The provided summary data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC's performance under this contract. Typically, for engineering and PMO support contracts, KPIs would focus on areas such as adherence to project schedules, budget management, quality of deliverables (e.g., design documents, reports), technical accuracy, responsiveness to task orders, and overall customer satisfaction. These metrics are usually detailed in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) and are used by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) to monitor progress and ensure the government receives the expected value. The absence of this information in the summary limits a full assessment of performance oversight.

What is the track record of Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC in federal contracting, particularly with DISA?

The provided data indicates that Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC is the contractor. Information regarding their specific track record, especially with the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), is not detailed in the summary. As a relatively new entity or one with limited publicly available contract history, assessing their past performance, experience with similar contracts, and overall reliability can be challenging. Federal procurement databases (like FPDS) would typically show a history of awards, task orders, and potentially past performance evaluations. A thorough review would involve examining their award history, the types of services previously provided, contract values, and any reported performance issues or successes to gauge their suitability for this role.

Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, such as technical challenges or contractor performance issues?

Based on the limited summary data, specific risks are not explicitly detailed. However, potential risks can be inferred. As the contractor is Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC, a less established entity in federal contracting might present a higher performance risk compared to a long-standing incumbent. The broad nature of 'engineering and PMO support' can also introduce risks related to scope definition and management. Furthermore, if this delivery order is part of a larger IDIQ contract, the overall success and stability of that parent contract could pose a risk. Technical risks would depend heavily on the specific systems and projects being supported, which are not elaborated upon in the summary.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2600 JOHN SAXON BLVD STE 2209, NORMAN, OK, 73071

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, HUBZone Firm, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,299,231

Exercised Options: $15,464,786

Current Obligation: $14,923,232

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCB21D0026

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline