DoD's $73.6M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to Trend Western Technical Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $73,641,416 ($73.6M)
Contractor: Del-Jen, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2001-12-18
End Date: 2010-03-30
Contract Duration: 3,024 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200203!000084!5700!JA02 !AETC CONS/CC !F4168902C0001 !A!N! !Y! !20011218!20020930!059220632!059220632!059220632!N!TREND WESTERN TECHNICAL CORP !4128 W COMMONWEALTH AVE !FULLERTON !CA!92833!72875!005!12!TYNDALL AFB !BAY !FLORIDA !+000003253058!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!006!K! !C!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !A! !B!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!
Place of Performance
Location: TYNDALL AFB, BAY County, FLORIDA, 32403
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $73.6 million to DEL-JEN, INC. for work described as: 200203!000084!5700!JA02 !AETC CONS/CC !F4168902C0001 !A!N! !Y! !20011218!20020930!059220632!059220632!059220632!N!TREND WESTERN TECHNICAL CORP !4128 W COMMONWEALTH AVE !FULLERTON !CA!92833!72875!005!12!TYNDALL AFB !BAY … Key points: 1. The contract is for facilities support services, a critical component of operational readiness. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract value of $73.6 million over its duration presents a significant financial commitment. 4. The sector is Facilities Support Services, which is essential for maintaining government infrastructure.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $73.6 million over 3024 days (approximately 8.3 years) averages to about $8.8 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale facilities support contracts would be necessary to determine if this represents a fair price.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of competition and impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The significant contract value suggests a substantial taxpayer investment. Ensuring competitive pricing and efficient service delivery is crucial for maximizing taxpayer value.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness and maintenance of critical facilities for the Department of Defense. Supports local economies through employment and subcontracting opportunities related to facilities management. Potential for long-term service provision, offering stability for the contractor and consistent support for the agency.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition due to exclusion of sources.
- Long contract duration may lead to price escalation or reduced flexibility.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes precise value assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a single entity for comprehensive service delivery.
- Fixed price contract type can provide cost certainty for the government.
- Services are essential for core government functions.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational support for government buildings and infrastructure. Spending in this sector is consistently high due to the extensive real estate holdings of federal agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's long duration and significant value warrant robust oversight to ensure performance standards are met and costs remain justified. Agency-level reviews and performance metrics are key accountability mechanisms.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to long contract duration.
- Risk of service quality degradation over time.
- Limited visibility into specific service components and performance metrics.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical infrastructure support.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, fl, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $73.6 million to DEL-JEN, INC.. 200203!000084!5700!JA02 !AETC CONS/CC !F4168902C0001 !A!N! !Y! !20011218!20020930!059220632!059220632!059220632!N!TREND WESTERN TECHNICAL CORP !4128 W COMMONWEALTH AVE !FULLERTON !CA!92833!72875!005!12!TYNDALL AFB !BAY !FLORIDA !+000003253058!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DEL-JEN, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $73.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-12-18. End: 2010-03-30.
What specific services are included under 'Facilities Support Services' for this contract, and how do they align with the agency's needs?
Facilities Support Services typically encompass a wide range of activities including maintenance, repair, custodial services, groundskeeping, and potentially specialized support like pest control or waste management. For this specific contract, the 'OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES' designation suggests a broad scope. A detailed review of the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) is necessary to understand the precise services required and how they directly support the Department of the Air Force's mission objectives and operational requirements.
How did the exclusion of sources in the competition process impact the final contract price and overall value for the government?
The exclusion of sources, even in a 'full and open' context, inherently limits the competitive landscape. If key potential bidders were excluded, the remaining pool of competitors might have had less incentive to offer the most aggressive pricing. This could have resulted in a higher-than-necessary price or a less optimal balance of cost and performance. A thorough review of the source selection justification and any pre-award market research would be needed to assess the extent of this impact.
What performance metrics and quality assurance measures are in place to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the services provided by Trend Western Technical Corp.?
Effective oversight of facilities support services relies heavily on clearly defined performance metrics and a robust quality assurance program. The contract likely includes a Performance Work Statement (PWS) with specific deliverables and standards. The agency's quality assurance personnel would be responsible for monitoring contractor performance against these standards, conducting inspections, and addressing any deficiencies. Without access to the PWS and quality assurance documentation, it's difficult to definitively assess the effectiveness measures.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Fluor Corporation (UEI: 006907190)
Address: 28441 HIGHRIDGE RD # 401, ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA, 36
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-12-18
Current End Date: 2010-03-30
Potential End Date: 2010-03-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-03-30
More Contracts from Del-Jen, Inc.
- 200206!000137!5700!JA02 !aetc Cons/Cc !F4168902C0010 !A!N! !Y! !20020304!20020930!059220632!059220632!059220632!n!trend Western Technical Corp !4128 W Commonwealth AVE !fullerton !ca!92833!41704!465!48!laughlin AFB !VAL Verde !texas !+000006310405!n!n!000000000000!r799!other Management Support Services !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!013!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !Z! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $128.2M (Department of Defense)
- Operation of Albuquerque JC Center — $55.8M (Department of Labor)
- Kittrell JOB Corps Center — $54.9M (Department of Labor)
- Operate the Mississippi JCC — $50.5M (Department of Labor)
- Operation of Gainesville JOB Corps Center and Provide Career Transition Services — $49.3M (Department of Labor)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)