DoD Awards $27.3M Task Order for Brigade Combat Team COFS Design & Construction to M. A. Mortenson Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,345,914 ($27.3M)
Contractor: M. a. Mortenson Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-24
End Date: 2011-09-15
Contract Duration: 721 days
Daily Burn Rate: $37.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: UNRESTRICTED MATOC TASK ORDER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF COFS FOR BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM
Place of Performance
Location: JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD, PIERCE County, WASHINGTON, 98433, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.3 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY for work described as: UNRESTRICTED MATOC TASK ORDER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF COFS FOR BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM Key points: 1. The contract is for design and construction of facilities for a Brigade Combat Team. 2. M. A. Mortenson Company, a large business, received the award. 3. The contract was awarded under Full and Open Competition. 4. The task order has a duration of 721 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $27.3 million for design and construction services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects for military facilities would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under Full and Open Competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and ensures fair market value is obtained.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers are likely receiving a fair price for the services rendered.
Public Impact
Enhances military readiness by providing necessary facilities for a Brigade Combat Team. Supports the construction sector and associated jobs. The project contributes to the modernization of military infrastructure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in large construction projects.
- Schedule delays are common in complex design and build contracts.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type limits cost risk to the government.
- Experienced contractor likely involved.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector for defense-related infrastructure can fluctuate based on military modernization needs and geopolitical factors.
Small Business Impact
The award was made to a large business (M. A. Mortenson Company) and the 'sb' (small business) indicator is false, suggesting no specific small business set-aside or subcontracting goals were explicitly stated in this data.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army awarded this task order, indicating oversight by a major defense agency. The firm fixed price contract type provides a degree of cost accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Large contract value.
- Construction projects are susceptible to delays.
- Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
- Reliance on a single large contractor for a significant portion of work.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, wa, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.3 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY. UNRESTRICTED MATOC TASK ORDER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF COFS FOR BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-24. End: 2011-09-15.
What specific types of facilities are included in the COFS for the Brigade Combat Team, and how do they align with current operational needs?
The provided data does not specify the exact types of facilities encompassed by 'COFS' (likely Command Operations Facilities or similar). Understanding the specific buildings (e.g., barracks, command centers, maintenance bays) is crucial to assess their alignment with the Brigade Combat Team's current operational requirements and future mission sets.
What were the key performance metrics and evaluation criteria used during the full and open competition to select M. A. Mortenson Company?
The data does not detail the specific evaluation criteria used in the full and open competition. Typically, such procurements consider factors like technical approach, past performance, management capability, and price. Understanding these criteria would shed light on how M. A. Mortenson Company's proposal was deemed the best value.
Are there any identified risks or challenges associated with the construction timeline of 721 days, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
A 721-day construction timeline for a significant facility project carries inherent risks of delays due to weather, supply chain issues, or unforeseen site conditions. While the firm fixed price contract aims to control costs, the government's primary concern regarding the timeline would be ensuring timely operational capability. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust project management, clear communication channels, and contingency planning.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: M. a. Mortenson Companies, Inc. (UEI: 130731797)
Address: 700 MEADOW LN N, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55422
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,345,914
Exercised Options: $27,345,914
Current Obligation: $27,345,914
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912HN08D0021
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-24
Current End Date: 2011-09-15
Potential End Date: 2011-09-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-07-11
More Contracts from M. a. Mortenson Company
- TAS::47 4543::TAS Modernization of the Byron G. Rogers Federal Office Building and the Byron G. Rogers Federal Courthouse Window Replacement in Denver, CO — $160.4M (General Services Administration)
- Construction Contract 2 for the Dept. of State, Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (fastc) in Blackstone, VA. Includes an Indoor Firing Range, Indoor/Outdoor Tactical Range, Tactical Training Building, Office and Classroom Building, Driving Tracks, Mock Urban Driving Track and Mock Embassy — $154.6M (General Services Administration)
- Clin 0001 Base BID Repair EHW 1 Phase 2 NSB Kings BAY GA — $154.6M (Department of Defense)
- Design-Build-Bridging Construction Services for the Modernization of the U.S. National Poultry Research Center (usnprc), Seprl Campus in Athens, GA This IS a Two-Phase Design-Build Acquisition. ONE Solicitation Covers Both Phases. Phase I IS the Pre-Selection Phase in Which the Government Will "shortlist" Maximum of (4) of the Most Highly Qualified Offerors. Only Those Firms Selected in Phase I Will BE Allowed to Continue to the Phase II. Detailed Design Criteria Will Then BE Added by Amendment to the Solicitation to Start the Phase II Stage of the Request for Proposals. Each Firm Selected for Participation in Phase II Will Then Submit a Design-Build Technical Proposal, the Remainder of the Performance Capability Proposal and Price Proposal. Igf::ot::igf — $149.6M (Department of Agriculture)
- Ibct — $141.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)