Labor Department awards $19.9M contract to ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC for technical school services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,936,835 ($19.9M)

Contractor: Adams and Associates Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Labor

Start Date: 2013-11-01

End Date: 2015-10-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $27.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: LAUREL, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20724

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Labor obligated $19.9 million to ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract value of $19.9M for technical and trade school services. 2. Awarded to ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC, a single vendor. 3. Contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee, indicating potential for cost overruns. 4. Services fall under 'Other Technical and Trade Schools' (NAICS 611519).

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $19.9M for technical school services needs comparison to similar contracts. Without benchmarks for 'Other Technical and Trade Schools' (NAICS 611519), assessing value is difficult. The Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure also introduces risk.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This lack of competition limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for a $19.9M contract raises concerns about potential overspending and inefficient use of taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying more than necessary due to the lack of competitive bidding. The specific services provided and their necessity require further scrutiny. Potential for cost overruns exists with the Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award
Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type
Lack of competition

Positive Signals

Services provided to the Department of Labor

Sector Analysis

The 'Other Technical and Trade Schools' sector (NAICS 611519) encompasses a wide range of educational services. Benchmarking spending in this specific sub-sector is challenging without more granular data.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation is needed to confirm.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure fair pricing and effective service delivery. Accountability for cost controls under the incentive fee structure is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Other Technical and Trade Schools
Department of Labor Contracting
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Programs

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competition.
Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns.
No indication of small business participation.
Lack of transparency regarding justification for sole-source award.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Labor awarded $19.9 million to ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC. IGF::CT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Labor (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-11-01. End: 2015-10-31.

What specific technical and trade school services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of Labor's mission?

The contract falls under NAICS code 611519, 'Other Technical and Trade Schools.' While the exact services are not detailed, they likely pertain to vocational training or specialized skill development relevant to the Department of Labor's workforce development and employee training needs. The specific alignment would require a review of the contract's statement of work.

What is the justification for awarding this $19.9M contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The justification for a sole-source award is not provided in the data. Typically, such justifications involve unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of other sources. Without this justification, it's impossible to assess the reasonableness of the pricing or the necessity of bypassing competition, raising concerns about potential taxpayer overpayment.

How effectively was the Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure managed to control costs and incentivize performance for ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC?

The effectiveness of the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure hinges on the clarity of performance metrics and the government's ability to monitor costs and incentivize desired outcomes. Without performance reports or cost analysis data, it's difficult to assess how well this CPIF contract managed costs and drove performance for ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Other Technical and Trade Schools

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10395 DOUBLE R BLVD, RENO, NV, 89521

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $33,544,692

Exercised Options: $23,571,429

Current Obligation: $19,936,835

Actual Outlays: $-69,154

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline