Department of Labor's Woodland Job Corps Center contract awarded to Adams and Associates Inc. for $54.7M over 8 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $54,743,570 ($54.7M)

Contractor: Adams and Associates Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Labor

Start Date: 2007-05-01

End Date: 2015-12-17

Contract Duration: 3,152 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OPERATATION OF THE WOODLAND JOB CORPS CENTER

Place of Performance

Location: LAUREL, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20724

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Labor obligated $54.7 million to ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC for work described as: OPERATATION OF THE WOODLAND JOB CORPS CENTER Key points: 1. The contract's duration of over 8 years suggests a long-term need for the services provided. 2. The Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) pricing structure allows for performance-based adjustments, potentially driving efficiency. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 611519 points to specialized technical and trade school services. 5. The contract's value of $54.7 million over its lifespan requires careful monitoring of performance and cost controls.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $54.7 million over approximately 8 years averages to about $6.8 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar Job Corps center operations would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. The CPIF contract type introduces variability based on performance, making direct cost comparisons challenging without understanding the incentive targets and achieved performance levels. However, the duration and scale suggest a significant investment in workforce development.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. With 3 bidders identified, this indicates a reasonable level of competition for the services. A competitive bidding process is generally expected to lead to more favorable pricing and better service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by fostering a market that drives down costs and encourages innovation, ensuring the government receives the best possible value for its investment in workforce development programs.

Public Impact

The Woodland Job Corps Center provides vocational training and educational services to young people, aiming to improve their employability. Beneficiaries include disadvantaged youth who receive skills training, GED preparation, and job placement assistance. The program has a geographic impact within Maryland, serving the local community and contributing to the regional workforce. The contract supports jobs related to education, training, facility management, and administrative services at the center.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if incentive targets are not met or if costs escalate beyond projections under the CPIF structure.
Ensuring consistent quality of training and job placement outcomes across the contract's long duration.
Monitoring contractor performance to ensure adherence to program goals and student success metrics.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market for these services.
The CPIF contract type incentivizes contractor performance, aligning their goals with the government's objectives.
The long contract duration indicates a stable and ongoing need for the services, providing continuity for students.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Education and Training Services sector, specifically focusing on vocational and technical education for youth. The Job Corps program is a significant federal initiative aimed at workforce development. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other Job Corps center contracts and similar government-funded training programs to assess cost-effectiveness and market rates for such services.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. Analysis of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would require further investigation into the contractor's utilization plans and performance reports. The absence of explicit set-asides suggests the primary focus was on full and open competition among larger entities or those capable of meeting the comprehensive service requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration. Mechanisms likely include regular performance reviews, financial audits, and adherence to program reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and potentially through program evaluation reports. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Job Corps Program
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Programs
Federal Job Training Programs
Vocational Education Contracts

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of cost escalation.
CPIF structure requires careful monitoring of performance metrics.
Potential for service quality degradation over extended period without strong oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Labor awarded $54.7 million to ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC. OPERATATION OF THE WOODLAND JOB CORPS CENTER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Labor (Employment and Training Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $54.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-05-01. End: 2015-12-17.

What is the historical spending trend for the Woodland Job Corps Center contract?

The provided data reflects a single definitive contract awarded to Adams and Associates Inc. for the operation of the Woodland Job Corps Center, spanning from May 1, 2007, to December 17, 2015, with a total value of $54,743,570. This represents the total obligated amount over the contract's life. To understand historical spending trends, one would need to examine prior contracts for this center, potentially from different awardees, and subsequent contracts awarded after December 2015. Analyzing annual obligations within this specific contract's period would also reveal spending patterns year-over-year, influenced by program needs and funding allocations.

How does the per-student cost of this contract compare to other Job Corps centers?

Determining the per-student cost requires knowing the average number of students served annually by the Woodland Job Corps Center under this contract. The total contract value is $54.7 million over approximately 8 years. If, for example, the center served an average of 500 students per year, the annual cost would be roughly $6.8 million, translating to approximately $13,600 per student per year. Comparing this figure to national averages or specific benchmarks for other Job Corps centers, which can vary significantly based on location, services offered, and student demographics, is crucial. Without specific student enrollment data for this contract period, a precise comparison is not possible, but this estimated range provides a basis for further inquiry.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to manage this Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract?

While the specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, CPIF contracts typically tie a portion of the contractor's fee to achieving specific performance targets. For a Job Corps center, these KPIs likely include metrics related to student training completion rates, graduation rates, job placement success (both in terms of percentage of students placed and starting wages), student satisfaction, and potentially cost control measures. The 'incentive' portion of the fee would be adjusted upwards or downwards based on performance against these pre-defined metrics, encouraging Adams and Associates Inc. to meet or exceed program goals set by the Department of Labor.

What is the track record of Adams and Associates Inc. in managing federal contracts, particularly in workforce development?

Adams and Associates Inc. has a history of managing federal contracts, including those related to workforce development and Job Corps centers. The award of this $54.7 million contract from 2007 to 2015 indicates a significant engagement with the Department of Labor. Further analysis would involve reviewing their performance on this and other contracts, looking for any documented issues, awards for excellence, or patterns of cost overruns or successes. Their ability to secure and manage such a substantial, long-term contract suggests a level of competence and experience recognized by the awarding agency.

What risks are associated with the long duration (over 8 years) of this contract?

The long duration of this contract presents several potential risks. Firstly, it increases the risk of cost escalation over time due to inflation or unforeseen changes in operating costs, which may not be fully captured by the CPIF structure. Secondly, there's a risk of contractor complacency or a decline in service quality if performance monitoring is not rigorous throughout the contract period. Thirdly, market conditions or federal priorities in workforce development could shift, making the contracted services less relevant or requiring significant adaptation, which might be more challenging to implement mid-contract. Finally, long-term reliance on a single contractor could stifle innovation if alternative approaches are not actively sought or encouraged.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Other Technical and Trade Schools

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10395 DOUBLE R BLVD, RENO, NV, 89521

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,834,706,205

Exercised Options: $1,521,461,291

Current Obligation: $54,743,570

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline