DOJ's $11.6M contract with PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC for services in DC, spanning over 5 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,584,231 ($11.6M)

Contractor: Project Performance Company, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2004-11-01

End Date: 2010-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,945 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.0K/day

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: T&M

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20226

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $11.6 million to PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC for work described as: T&M Key points: 1. The contract utilized a Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, which can pose cost control challenges if not closely managed. 2. With a duration of 1945 days, the contract represents a significant, long-term commitment by the agency. 3. The award was made to a single entity, PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC, indicating a potentially limited competition scenario. 4. The contract's performance period concluded in early 2010, providing historical data for analysis. 5. The total award amount of $11,584,230.67 suggests a substantial investment in the services provided. 6. The contract was awarded by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award value of $11.6 million over approximately 5.3 years suggests an average annual spend of around $2.2 million. Without specific details on the services rendered, it's challenging to benchmark against similar contracts. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model, while flexible, can lead to cost overruns if not meticulously monitored. The absence of a fixed price or ceiling could indicate a higher risk for the government in terms of cost predictability compared to firm-fixed-price contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data indicates only one award was made to PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC. However, it does not specify the competition method used for this award. It's unclear if this was a sole-source award, a result of limited competition, or if it emerged from a full and open competition where only one bid was received or deemed acceptable. Further investigation into the solicitation process is needed to determine the level of competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. Limited or sole-source awards may result in higher prices due to reduced market pressure, while robust competition typically drives down costs and improves service quality.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract was likely the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) within the Department of Justice. The contract supported the operational needs of the ATF by providing necessary services over an extended period. Services were delivered within the District of Columbia, impacting local operations and potentially the local workforce. The duration and value suggest a role in supporting core functions or significant projects within the ATF.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not managed with rigorous oversight and clear performance metrics.
Lack of detailed information on the competition process makes it difficult to assess if the government secured the best possible value.
The contract's significant duration and value warrant scrutiny regarding its ongoing necessity and performance throughout its lifecycle.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded to a specific company, PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC, indicating a focused engagement for services.
The contract spanned a considerable period (over 5 years), suggesting a sustained need and potentially successful delivery of services.
The award was made by a specialized division within the ATF, implying a targeted procurement for specific agency requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broad category of professional services or support services procured by federal agencies. The market for such services is vast, encompassing a wide range of specialized expertise. Federal spending in this area is substantial, with agencies frequently outsourcing functions to private sector entities to leverage specialized skills or manage workload. Benchmarking would require detailed knowledge of the specific services rendered, but the overall award value is moderate for a multi-year federal contract.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication from the provided data that this contract involved small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. The award was made to PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC, and further details would be needed to ascertain any impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the ATF. Performance monitoring, invoicing review, and compliance checks are standard oversight procedures. Transparency would depend on the agency's policies regarding contract data disclosure. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Contracts
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Procurements
Time and Materials Contracts
Professional Services Contracts
District of Columbia Federal Contracts

Risk Flags

Time and Materials Pricing Risk
Potential Lack of Competition
Limited Performance Data Available

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $11.6 million to PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC. T&M

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-11-01. End: 2010-02-28.

What specific services did PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC provide under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the services rendered by PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC. The contract was awarded by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Acquisition and Property Management Division. Given the agency's mission, services could range from administrative support, IT services, investigative support, consulting, or specialized technical assistance. Without a contract description or statement of work, the precise services remain unknown. Further research into the contract's details would be necessary to identify the specific deliverables and scope of work.

How did the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure impact the final cost compared to a fixed-price contract?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts allow the government to pay the contractor for the actual cost of labor (at specified hourly rates) and materials, plus a fee or profit. This structure offers flexibility, especially when the scope of work is not well-defined at the outset. However, it carries a higher risk of cost overruns for the government if not managed diligently, as the final cost is not predetermined. In contrast, a fixed-price contract establishes a ceiling cost, providing greater cost certainty for the government. The final cost impact of the T&M structure for this $11.6 million contract depends heavily on the contractor's efficiency, the accuracy of labor hour estimates, and the government's oversight in monitoring hours and materials used.

What was the competitive landscape for this contract award?

The provided data indicates that PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC received one award. However, it does not specify the method of competition used. It is unclear whether this was a sole-source award, a limited competition among a few pre-selected vendors, or a full and open competition where only one bid was submitted or deemed acceptable. Understanding the competitive landscape is crucial for assessing whether the government obtained fair and reasonable pricing. If competition was limited, the government may have paid a premium compared to a scenario with multiple competing bids.

What is the track record of PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC with federal contracts?

The data indicates PROJECT PERFORMANCE COMPANY, LLC was awarded this specific contract by the Department of Justice. To assess their broader track record, one would need to examine other federal contract awards to this entity. This would involve searching databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or USAspending.gov for other contracts, their values, agencies involved, performance history, and any reported issues or awards. A comprehensive review would reveal patterns in their contracting behavior, performance quality, and reliability as a government contractor.

How does the $11.6 million award value compare to typical spending for similar services within the ATF or DOJ?

The $11.6 million award value over approximately 5.3 years (November 2004 to February 2010) represents an average annual expenditure of roughly $2.2 million. To benchmark this, one would need to compare it against other contracts for similar services procured by the ATF or the wider Department of Justice during that period or subsequent periods. Factors such as the specific nature of the services, contract duration, and economic conditions influence spending levels. Without detailed service descriptions and comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state whether this amount was high, low, or average.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?

The provided data does not include information on the key performance indicators (KPIs) or evaluation metrics established for this contract. Typically, government contracts include a Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) that outlines specific performance standards, deliverables, and quality requirements. The success of the contract would be measured against these criteria. Oversight by the contracting officer and relevant agency personnel would involve monitoring the contractor's adherence to these KPIs throughout the contract period. Without access to the contract's SOW/PWS, assessing performance evaluation is not possible.

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Project Performance Company LLC (UEI: 078718361)

Address: 1760 OLD MEADOW RD FL 4, MC LEAN, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,608,257

Exercised Options: $11,608,257

Current Obligation: $11,584,231

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 26301D0091

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline