Omniplex World Services Corporation awarded $20.18M for security guard services, raising value-for-money questions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,182,710 ($20.2M)

Contractor: Omniplex World Services Corporation

Awarding Agency: Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency

Start Date: 2013-09-29

End Date: 2018-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,888 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF SECURITY GUARD FOR OFFENDER TREATMENT BUILDINGS

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20001

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency obligated $20.2 million to OMNIPLEX WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF SECURITY GUARD FOR OFFENDER TREATMENT BUILDINGS Key points: 1. The contract's value-for-money is questionable given the lack of detailed performance metrics and the relatively high per-unit cost. 2. Competition dynamics show a full and open process, which is positive, but the final award price relative to estimated costs is not detailed. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with potential concerns around service continuity and performance monitoring. 4. Performance context is limited, with no clear benchmarks provided for guard effectiveness or response times. 5. Sector positioning is within professional services, specifically security and protective services for government facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The total award of $20.18 million over five years for security guard services appears substantial. Without detailed breakdowns of guard hours, pay rates, or specific service level agreements, it is difficult to benchmark the value effectively against similar contracts. The fixed-price nature suggests cost certainty for the agency, but it may not guarantee optimal value if performance is not rigorously monitored or if market rates for comparable services are significantly lower.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 10 bids suggests a healthy level of interest in the contract. However, the specific details of the bidding process, such as the range of bids received and the evaluation criteria, are not publicly available, making it hard to assess if the competition effectively drove down prices.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, potentially leading to lower prices and better service quality through competitive pressure.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (CSOSA), which receives essential security services for its facilities. The services delivered include providing security guards to protect offender treatment buildings, ensuring the safety of staff, offenders, and the public. The geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia, where CSOSA facilities are located. Workforce implications include the creation of jobs for security guards employed by Omniplex World Services Corporation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true effectiveness and value of the security services provided.
The fixed-price contract may incentivize cost-cutting over optimal service quality if not managed with robust oversight.
Limited public information on the specific duties and qualifications of the guards employed under this contract.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
The contract duration of five years provides stability for service delivery.
The contractor, Omniplex World Services Corporation, is an established entity in the security services sector.

Sector Analysis

The security services industry is a significant sector within the broader professional services market. This contract falls under the sub-sector of government facility security and protective services. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous providers ranging from large corporations to smaller specialized firms. Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without specific details on guard hours, pay scales, and the exact nature of the facilities protected, but government contracts for security personnel often represent a substantial portion of agency budgets.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, as the primary award went to a larger corporation. Future opportunities for small businesses would depend on Omniplex's subcontracting decisions, which are not detailed in the available information.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (CSOSA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's performance work statement (PWS). Transparency is limited, as detailed performance reports and oversight findings are not readily available to the public. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Protective Service Contracts
Department of Justice Security Contracts
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule Contracts
Corrections and Law Enforcement Support Services

Risk Flags

Value for Money Concerns
Limited Performance Transparency
Potential for Service Quality Compromise

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency awarded $20.2 million to OMNIPLEX WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION. IGF::CT::IGF SECURITY GUARD FOR OFFENDER TREATMENT BUILDINGS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OMNIPLEX WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-09-29. End: 2018-11-30.

What specific security services are provided under this contract, and what are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure effectiveness?

The contract specifies 'SECURITY GUARD FOR OFFENDER TREATMENT BUILDINGS.' However, the detailed scope of work and specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are not publicly disclosed in the provided data. Typically, such contracts would include metrics related to guard presence, response times to incidents, access control, perimeter security, and adherence to post orders. Without these specifics, it is challenging to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of the security services provided by Omniplex World Services Corporation. The agency's internal monitoring and evaluation processes would be crucial for ensuring performance standards are met.

How does the awarded price of $20.18 million compare to the estimated cost or budget for these security services?

The provided data indicates an award amount of $20,182,709.86. However, it does not include the original estimated cost or the agency's allocated budget for these security services. To perform a value-for-money assessment, comparing the awarded price to the estimated cost is essential. A significant difference could indicate either highly competitive bidding that drove the price down or an initial underestimation of costs. Without the estimated cost, it's impossible to determine if the contract was awarded at a favorable price point relative to expectations.

What is the track record of Omniplex World Services Corporation in providing similar security services to federal agencies?

Omniplex World Services Corporation has a history of providing security services, including to government entities. While specific details of their past performance on similar federal contracts are not provided here, their ability to win a full and open competition for a significant contract like this suggests they meet the basic qualifications and have a competitive offering. A deeper dive into their past performance evaluations, any past performance issues, and their experience with correctional or offender treatment facilities would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their track record.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single contractor for security services at multiple offender treatment buildings?

Relying on a single contractor like Omniplex World Services Corporation for security at multiple offender treatment buildings presents several potential risks. These include service disruption due to contractor performance issues, labor disputes, or financial instability. There's also a risk of complacency or reduced vigilance over time if performance is not rigorously monitored. Furthermore, if the contractor fails to maintain adequate staffing levels or quality of personnel, it could compromise the security of these sensitive facilities, potentially leading to safety risks for staff, offenders, and the public. The agency's contingency planning and contract management are critical to mitigating these risks.

How does the contract's fixed-price structure impact cost control and potential for cost overruns?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract structure, like the one used here, is generally advantageous for the government as it shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. The contractor is obligated to perform the specified work for the agreed-upon price. This structure provides budget certainty for the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency. However, it can also incentivize the contractor to cut corners on service quality or staffing if not managed diligently. Conversely, if the contractor significantly underestimates costs, they bear the loss. For the government, the primary risk with FFP is ensuring the contractor delivers the required quality and scope of services within the fixed price.

What is the historical spending pattern for security guard services by the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency?

The provided data only pertains to this specific $20.18 million contract awarded in 2013 and ending in 2018. It does not offer insight into the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency's (CSOSA) historical spending patterns for security guard services before or after this period. To understand historical trends, one would need to analyze CSOSA's budget allocations and contract awards for similar services over multiple fiscal years. This would help determine if spending has increased, decreased, or remained consistent, and whether this contract represents a typical investment or an outlier.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Constellis Holdings, LLC

Address: 14151 PARK MEADOW DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $81,854,282

Exercised Options: $20,712,403

Current Obligation: $20,182,710

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07F0256L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline