FCC Spends $20.8M on Uniformed Protective Force Services from Omniplex World Services Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,798,207 ($20.8M)

Contractor: Omniplex World Services Corporation

Awarding Agency: Federal Communications Commission

Start Date: 2011-02-03

End Date: 2017-07-31

Contract Duration: 2,370 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: UNIFORMED PROTECTIVE FORCE

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20554

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Federal Communications Commission obligated $20.8 million to OMNIPLEX WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION for work described as: UNIFORMED PROTECTIVE FORCE Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Omniplex World Services Corporation for uniformed protective force services totaled $20.8 million. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract was 2370 days, spanning from February 2011 to July 2017. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 indicates Engineering Services, which may not directly align with protective force services, warranting further investigation. 5. The absence of small business participation is noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $20.8 million over approximately 6.5 years averages to about $3.2 million annually. Without specific contract line item details or comparable service contracts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the duration and scope suggest a significant investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and promotes price discovery. The use of a delivery order structure suggests task-based ordering against a larger contract vehicle.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it should have driven a more reasonable price. However, the specific value derived from the services needs further scrutiny.

Public Impact

Ensures the physical security of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) facilities and personnel. Provides a consistent security presence throughout the contract period. Supports the FCC's mission by maintaining a secure operational environment. The contract's value represents a notable expenditure on security services for a federal agency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

NAICS code mismatch (Engineering Services for Protective Force).
No small business participation.
Long contract duration without clear performance metrics provided.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Firm Fixed Price contract type.

Sector Analysis

The spending falls under professional, scientific, and technical services, specifically related to security and engineering. Benchmarking this against other federal agencies' spending on uniformed protective forces would provide better context for value.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that no small businesses participated in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. This represents a missed opportunity for small business engagement and economic development.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded via delivery order, implying oversight of task execution. However, the long duration and the potential NAICS code discrepancy suggest a need for ongoing performance monitoring and justification of continued need.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Federal Communications Commission Contracting
Federal Communications Commission Programs

Risk Flags

Potential NAICS code misclassification.
Lack of small business participation.
Limited transparency on specific services and performance metrics.
Long contract duration without clear justification for renewal or extension.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Federal Communications Commission awarded $20.8 million to OMNIPLEX WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION. UNIFORMED PROTECTIVE FORCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OMNIPLEX WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-02-03. End: 2017-07-31.

Was the NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) appropriate for a contract primarily for uniformed protective force services, and if not, what was the justification?

The use of NAICS code 541330 for uniformed protective force services is unusual, as this code typically covers engineering services. It's possible the contract included engineering-related security assessments or design components. However, without further documentation, it raises questions about the accuracy of the classification and whether a more appropriate code, such as one for security services, was overlooked. This could impact benchmarking and competition analysis.

What specific security services were provided under this contract, and how was their effectiveness measured to justify the $20.8 million expenditure?

The contract details do not specify the exact security services rendered beyond 'Uniformed Protective Force.' Effectiveness metrics, such as incident response times, crime deterrence rates, or security breaches prevented, are not provided. Understanding these performance indicators is crucial to assessing whether the $20.8 million investment yielded adequate value and met the FCC's security objectives.

Given the contract's duration and the lack of small business participation, were there opportunities missed for cost savings or enhanced service through different contracting approaches?

The long duration (over 6 years) and the absence of small business involvement suggest potential missed opportunities. Shorter contract periods or set-aside awards could have fostered more competition, potentially driving down costs or introducing innovative solutions from specialized small businesses. Evaluating alternative contracting strategies might reveal avenues for greater efficiency and value for taxpayer money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Constellis Holdings, LLC

Address: 13530 DULLES TECHNOLOGY DRIVE STE 500, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $35,977,333

Exercised Options: $21,549,944

Current Obligation: $20,798,207

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07F0256L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline