EPA awards $21.4M contract to Cadmus Group for management consulting services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,366,227 ($21.4M)
Contractor: THE Cadmus Group LLC
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2002-03-15
End Date: 2007-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,842 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: WATERTOWN, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02472
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $21.4 million to THE CADMUS GROUP LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $21.4 million over 5 years. 2. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting. 3. Awarded via full and open competition. 4. No indication of small business participation.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Without specific pricing details or benchmarks for similar services, assessing the value is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is a positive sign for taxpayer value, though the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure warrants careful monitoring to ensure costs remain reasonable.
Public Impact
Environmental protection initiatives may benefit from expert management consulting. Taxpayer funds are allocated for administrative and management support. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term need for these services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize overspending.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Long contract duration indicates sustained need.
Sector Analysis
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) frequently procures management consulting services to support its broad mission. Benchmarks for similar contracts would typically vary based on the specific scope and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a structured procurement process. Oversight would focus on managing the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure to ensure cost control and adherence to contract scope.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
- No small business participation indicated.
- Potential for cost overruns with CPFF.
- Limited transparency on specific service outcomes.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, environmental-protection-agency, ma, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $21.4 million to THE CADMUS GROUP LLC. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE CADMUS GROUP LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-03-15. End: 2007-03-31.
What specific management consulting services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the EPA's mission?
The contract was for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. These services likely supported the EPA in areas such as strategic planning, operational efficiency, program management, and policy implementation. The specific contributions would depend on the tasks performed, but generally aim to improve the agency's effectiveness and resource utilization in environmental protection efforts.
What were the key factors considered during the Cost Plus Fixed Fee negotiation to ensure fair pricing and prevent cost overruns?
During negotiations for a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, the government typically scrutinizes the estimated costs submitted by the contractor. Key factors include the reasonableness of direct and indirect costs, the contractor's historical cost data, and the proposed fixed fee, which represents the contractor's profit. The government would also establish clear performance metrics and reporting requirements to monitor costs and progress throughout the contract lifecycle.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was obtained for the taxpayer, given the CPFF structure?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize the number of potential bidders, thereby fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and value. However, the CPFF structure itself carries inherent risks of cost escalation. The effectiveness in ensuring best value would depend on the rigor of the evaluation process, the clarity of the statement of work, and the government's ability to effectively manage and oversee the contract to control costs and ensure performance aligns with the fixed fee.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 57 WATER ST, WATERTOWN, MA, 05
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-03-15
Current End Date: 2007-03-31
Potential End Date: 2007-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-12-03
More Contracts from THE Cadmus Group LLC
- Implementation of the Public Water Systems Supervision (pwss) and Underground Injection Control (UIC) Programs — $53.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Federal Contract — $42.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- THE Contractor Will Provide Technical, Analytical, Logistical, Administrative, Engineering and Statistical Support to the Agency's Efforts to Develop and Implement Regulations, Guidance and Policies Across This Full Range of Sdwa Implementation Activities. This Includes Activities Such AS Collecting Data, Information and Materials and Providing Factual Studies, Trend Analyses and Recommendations; Conducting Modeling and Assessments to Support Risk Characterization and Impact Analyses Development and Survey Support and Facilitation. the Contractor Shall Provide Such Support in Accordance With Specific Written Work Assignments or Request for Proposals for Task Orders Related to the Agency's Development of Drinking Water, Ground Water, and UIC Regulations, Future Regulatory and Programmatic Decisions, and Implementation of ITS Policies and Programs Under the Sdwa — $42.3M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Digital Strategy Implementation and Programs — $38.5M (Agency for International Development)
- Federal Contract — $36.4M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)