NASA's $59.4M Facilities Maintenance Contract Awarded to IAP World Services, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $59,370,192 ($59.4M)
Contractor: IAP World Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 1999-10-22
End Date: 2004-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,805 days
Daily Burn Rate: $32.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $59.4 million to IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC. for work described as: FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR Key points: 1. Contract Value: $59.4 million over 5 years. 2. Contractor: IAP World Services, Inc. 3. Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 4. Contract Type: Fixed Price Incentive. 5. Competition: Full and Open Competition.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $59.4 million over approximately 5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar facilities maintenance contracts would be necessary to fully assess pricing, but the fixed-price incentive structure aims to control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing as multiple qualified vendors can bid.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is beneficial for taxpayers, likely resulting in a fair market price for the services rendered.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness of NASA facilities. Supports critical research and development infrastructure. Provides essential services for agency personnel. Contributes to the maintenance of government assets.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Fixed Price Incentive contracts can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.
- Small business participation is not indicated, potentially missing opportunities for smaller firms.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery.
- Experienced contractor likely possesses necessary expertise.
Sector Analysis
Facilities maintenance and repair is a crucial sector for government operations, ensuring the longevity and functionality of critical infrastructure. Spending benchmarks vary widely based on facility size, type, and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting goals were established or met.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by NASA, an agency with established oversight mechanisms. The fixed-price incentive structure implies performance and cost monitoring to ensure accountability.
Related Government Programs
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in FPI contracts.
- Lack of explicit small business awardee.
- Need for detailed performance and cost data to fully assess value.
- Contract duration may not align with evolving facility needs.
Tags
national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $59.4 million to IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC.. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is IAP WORLD SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $59.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1999-10-22. End: 2004-09-30.
What is the typical cost per square foot for facilities maintenance in government facilities of similar size and type?
Benchmarking the cost per square foot for facilities maintenance requires detailed information on the specific types of facilities, their age, geographic location, and the scope of services included. Government facilities can range from office buildings to highly specialized research labs, each with unique maintenance needs and associated costs. A typical range might be $5-$25 per square foot annually, but this is highly variable and requires a detailed comparison to be meaningful.
What are the specific incentive metrics in the Fixed Price Incentive contract, and how have they impacted cost and performance?
The Fixed Price Incentive (FPI) contract structure includes target cost, target profit, and price ceilings, with adjustments based on actual costs. To assess effectiveness, one would need to examine the contract's final cost, profit, and performance metrics against the initial targets. Understanding the specific incentive clauses and how they motivated the contractor to control costs while meeting performance standards is key to evaluating the contract's success.
How does the annual spending on this contract compare to NASA's overall facilities maintenance budget?
To determine how this contract's annual spending compares to NASA's overall facilities maintenance budget, we would need access to NASA's historical budget allocations for facilities maintenance. The $59.4 million contract over approximately 5 years averages around $11.88 million per year. Comparing this figure to the total annual budget for facilities maintenance across all NASA centers would provide context on its relative significance.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. (UEI: 014784388)
Address: 7315 N. ATLANTIC AVE., CAPE CANAVERAL, FL, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,300,122
Exercised Options: $56,094,570
Current Obligation: $59,370,192
Timeline
Start Date: 1999-10-22
Current End Date: 2004-09-30
Potential End Date: 2004-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-07-10
More Contracts from IAP World Services, Inc.
- 200107!000106!2100!KF04 !directorate of Contracting !dakf0400c0002 !a!n!*!n!p00001 !20001222!20010930!010816486!010816486!006092860!n!johnson Controls World Service!7315 N Atlantic AVE !cape Canaveral !fl!32920!25114!071!06!fort Irwin !SAN Bernardino !california!+000002389052!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561990!*!*!3! ! !c!*!*!*!b!*!*!n!z!a !N!R!2!004!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $405.0M (Department of Defense)
- Contractor Logisitics Support E-6B — $240.0M (Department of Defense)
- Award of Satellite Communication (satcom) Support Services — $221.2M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $194.9M (Department of Defense)
- Facilities Maintenance Services (FMS) — $101.9M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →