USAID's $17M Foreign Assistance Program Awarded to International Resources Group Ltd. for Consulting Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,010,796 ($17.0M)

Contractor: International Resources Group Ltd.

Awarding Agency: Agency for International Development

Start Date: 2004-05-05

End Date: 2009-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,760 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FOREIGN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Plain-Language Summary

Agency for International Development obligated $17.0 million to INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LTD. for work described as: FOREIGN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $17.01 million, was awarded for 'Other Management Consulting Services'. 2. International Resources Group Ltd. secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is 1760 days, spanning from May 2004 to February 2009. 4. This award falls under the 'Other Management Consulting Services' category, indicating a need for specialized expertise in program management or advisory roles.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $17.01 million over approximately 4.8 years suggests a significant investment. Without specific benchmarks for similar foreign assistance consulting contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing. However, the duration and scope imply a substantial service requirement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of potential contractors to bid. This method is expected to yield a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: The $17.01 million expenditure represents taxpayer funds allocated to foreign assistance, aiming to achieve specific development or diplomatic objectives. The effectiveness of this spending in achieving those goals is a key consideration for taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Supports U.S. foreign policy objectives through program implementation and management. Potential impact on recipient countries' development and stability. Funds allocated for consulting services could have been used for direct aid or other program components.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under professional services, specifically management consulting, within the broader context of government contracting for foreign assistance. Benchmarks for such services can vary widely based on the complexity and geographic focus of the program.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly awarded this contract, as it was awarded to International Resources Group Ltd. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight by the Agency for International Development (USAID) is crucial to ensure the effective and efficient use of funds. Regular reporting and performance reviews would be standard for a contract of this nature.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-management-consulting-services, agency-for-international-development, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Agency for International Development awarded $17.0 million to INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LTD.. FOREIGN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Agency for International Development (Agency for International Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-05-05. End: 2009-02-28.

What specific foreign assistance objectives did this contract aim to achieve, and how was success measured?

The provided data does not specify the exact foreign assistance objectives or the metrics used to measure success. Typically, such contracts support goals like economic development, humanitarian aid, or democratic institution building. Measuring success would involve tracking progress against predefined targets related to these objectives, such as improved infrastructure, increased access to services, or strengthened governance.

What was the competitive landscape for this 'Other Management Consulting Services' contract, and did the full and open competition result in optimal pricing?

While the contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' the provided data doesn't detail the number of bids received or the pricing strategies of competing firms. This method generally fosters competitive pricing, but without comparative bid data or market analysis, it's challenging to confirm if the final price was truly optimal. The duration and specialized nature of the services could also influence pricing dynamics.

How effectively were taxpayer funds utilized to achieve the intended foreign assistance outcomes through this contract?

Assessing the effectiveness of taxpayer fund utilization requires detailed performance reports and outcome evaluations, which are not included in the provided data. The $17.01 million contract was intended to support foreign assistance goals, but its true value is determined by the tangible results achieved in the target region or sector. Without post-award assessments, it's difficult to definitively gauge the return on investment for these funds.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesOther Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)

Address: 1211 CONN AVE NW STE 700, WASHINGTON, DC, 98

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $511,310,738

Exercised Options: $335,327,465

Current Obligation: $17,010,796

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-05-05

Current End Date: 2009-02-28

Potential End Date: 2009-02-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-03-22

More Contracts from International Resources Group Ltd.

View all International Resources Group Ltd. federal contracts →

Other Agency for International Development Contracts

View all Agency for International Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending