USAID's $48.5M Management Consulting Contract to International Resources Group Ltd. Extended to 2023

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $48,489,386 ($48.5M)

Contractor: International Resources Group Ltd.

Awarding Agency: Agency for International Development

Start Date: 2006-09-29

End Date: 2023-07-05

Contract Duration: 6,123 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.9K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ANE MOBIS: WORKFORCE SURGE CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20523

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Agency for International Development obligated $48.5 million to INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LTD. for work described as: ANE MOBIS: WORKFORCE SURGE CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Long contract duration of over 6000 days suggests a sustained need for services. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictable spending. 4. The contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating some level of competition. 5. The primary agency is the Agency for International Development (USAID). 6. Services are being delivered in Washington D.C.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $48.5 million over its extended period suggests a significant investment in management consulting services. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for administrative and general management consulting is challenging without more specific service details. However, the firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control. The long duration implies a consistent need, but also raises questions about potential cost creep if not managed effectively. Further analysis would require comparing the specific deliverables and outcomes against industry standards and the pricing of comparable consulting engagements.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order. While 'competitive' implies multiple bids were considered, the term 'delivery order' often suggests it was placed against a pre-existing indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. The exact number of bidders and the nature of the competition (e.g., full and open vs. set-aside) are not detailed here. A limited competition scenario, even within a competitive IDIQ, might result in less aggressive pricing compared to a full and open solicitation.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award, even if limited, is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely led to a more favorable price than a sole-source award. However, the full extent of taxpayer savings depends on the number of bidders and the rigor of the evaluation process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Agency for International Development (USAID), which receives administrative and management support. The services delivered likely enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of USAID's operations. The contract's geographic impact is centered in Washington D.C., where the services are performed. The contract supports a workforce engaged in management consulting, contributing to the professional services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration could lead to potential cost inefficiencies if not closely monitored.
Lack of specific details on the competitive process limits a full assessment of value for money.
The broad nature of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' may obscure specific performance metrics.

Positive Signals

Awarded as a competitive delivery order, suggesting some level of market vetting.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
The contract has been active for a significant period, indicating a sustained and potentially valuable service relationship.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This is a large and diverse sector supporting government agencies across various functions. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611, 'Management Consulting Services,' covers establishments primarily engaged in providing advice and assistance to businesses and other organizations on administrative and management issues. Spending in this category is substantial across federal agencies, reflecting the ongoing need for specialized expertise.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication from the provided data that this contract involved small business set-asides or significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The awardee, International Resources Group Ltd., is likely a larger entity. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be necessary to determine the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officers and program managers at the Agency for International Development (USAID). As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, oversight might also be influenced by the terms of the base IDIQ contract. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, but detailed performance reports and Inspector General audits would provide deeper insights into accountability and effectiveness.

Related Government Programs

USAID Program Management Support Contracts
Federal Management Consulting Services
Administrative Support Services Contracts
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Long contract duration
Broad service description
Limited competition details

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Agency for International Development awarded $48.5 million to INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LTD.. ANE MOBIS: WORKFORCE SURGE CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Agency for International Development (Agency for International Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $48.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-29. End: 2023-07-05.

What specific types of administrative and management consulting services has International Resources Group Ltd. provided under this contract?

The provided data categorizes this contract under NAICS code 541611, 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' This broad classification suggests services could range from organizational structure analysis, strategic planning, operational efficiency improvements, human capital management, financial management consulting, to process re-engineering. Without access to the detailed statement of work or performance reports, the precise nature of the services rendered remains unspecified. However, given the agency (USAID), it is plausible that these services support the administration and management of international development programs, including aspects like program evaluation, policy development, and operational support for field missions.

How does the $48.5 million total award value compare to typical spending on similar management consulting contracts by USAID or other agencies?

The total award value of $48.5 million over its extended period (approximately 16.7 years from 2006 to 2023) represents an average annual spend of roughly $2.9 million. This figure is moderate for large federal consulting contracts. USAID, like other large agencies, procures significant amounts of management and administrative support. Contracts of this value are common for providing sustained, high-level advisory services. However, a direct comparison requires analyzing the scope of work, deliverables, and the specific expertise required. Some agencies might award larger, more specialized contracts, while others might use multiple smaller contracts. The long duration suggests a consistent, perhaps foundational, role for IRG.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of International Resources Group Ltd.'s services under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for management consulting services, KPIs would be tailored to the specific objectives outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW). These could include metrics related to efficiency gains achieved in specific USAID processes, successful implementation of new management strategies, cost savings identified and realized, improvements in organizational effectiveness, or timely delivery of analytical reports and recommendations. The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type often implies that performance is tied to the successful completion of defined tasks and deliverables, rather than hourly rates, suggesting that meeting these deliverables would be a primary measure of success.

What is the historical spending trend for this specific contract and for management consulting services at USAID overall?

This contract, awarded in September 2006 and extended until July 2023, shows a consistent and long-term engagement with International Resources Group Ltd. The total award value of $48.5 million indicates sustained funding over its lifespan. Historical spending data would reveal the annual disbursement patterns, which could show periods of higher or lower activity based on USAID's programmatic needs and budget allocations. Regarding overall USAID spending on management consulting (NAICS 541611), trends would likely reflect agency priorities, budget cycles, and the increasing reliance on external expertise for complex international development challenges. Analyzing broader trends would require examining aggregate spending data for this NAICS code across USAID over multiple fiscal years.

Are there any identified risks or concerns associated with the performance or management of this contract?

Based on the limited data, specific performance risks are not detailed. However, general risks associated with long-term, large-value consulting contracts include potential scope creep, over-reliance on the contractor, challenges in measuring intangible benefits of consulting advice, and ensuring the contractor maintains up-to-date expertise. The 'fair' value assessment suggests that while the contract may be providing adequate value, there might be room for improvement or potential for better pricing/performance. The long duration itself can be a risk if the contractor's approach becomes outdated or if the agency's needs evolve significantly without contract adjustments.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: M/OAA/GRO/EGAS-06-2664

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Research Triangle Institute

Address: 1320 BRADDOCK PLACE STE 600-700, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $61,848,937

Exercised Options: $61,848,937

Current Obligation: $48,489,386

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0076M

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline