Department of Energy awards $34.7M contract for PICSSS program management and control services to Allegheny Science & Technology Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $34,677,239 ($34.7M)
Contractor: Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2023-05-01
End Date: 2028-04-30
Contract Duration: 1,826 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: PROGRAM INFORMATION COLLECTION SYSTEM AD SUPPORT SERVICES (PICSSS) - UNDER THIS TASK ORDER CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE EXPERTISE AND SERVICES TO IMPLEMENT INDUSTRY STANDARD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL PRINCIPLES TO INCLUDE PROJECT MANAG
Place of Performance
Location: IDAHO FALLS, BONNEVILLE County, IDAHO, 83415
State: Idaho Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $34.7 million to ALLEGHENY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION for work described as: PROGRAM INFORMATION COLLECTION SYSTEM AD SUPPORT SERVICES (PICSSS) - UNDER THIS TASK ORDER CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE EXPERTISE AND SERVICES TO IMPLEMENT INDUSTRY STANDARD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL PRINCIPLES TO INCLUDE PROJECT MANAG Key points: 1. Contract focuses on implementing industry-standard program management and control principles. 2. Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation is the sole awardee under this task order. 3. The contract duration is approximately five years, aligning with long-term program needs. 4. Services include project management and control expertise. 5. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges. 6. This award is part of a larger Indefinite Delivery contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this Time and Materials contract is challenging without detailed labor rates and hours. However, the total award amount of $34.7 million over five years suggests a moderate annual spend. Comparisons to similar program management support contracts would be necessary to fully assess value for money. The lack of a fixed price or ceiling on labor hours within the task order itself warrants careful monitoring to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. However, this specific task order was awarded to a single contractor, Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation. The level of competition for the underlying IDIQ contract is not specified, but the task order itself was not competed among multiple offerors.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition for the base IDIQ contract generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and service quality. However, for this specific task order, the lack of further competition among potential providers means taxpayers rely on the initial competitive process for the IDIQ and the contractor's proposed pricing.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy benefits from specialized expertise in program management and control. Services delivered will support the effective implementation and oversight of specific programs. The geographic impact is primarily at the Idaho National Laboratory site, where the contract is managed. Workforce implications include the potential for direct hires by Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation to fulfill the contract requirements.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess effectiveness.
- The contract is a task order under a larger IDIQ, so its specific scope and value may be subject to change.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process for the base IDIQ.
- Contract duration of five years provides stability for program support.
- Focus on industry-standard program management principles indicates a commitment to best practices.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically focusing on program management and control. The market for such services is robust, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise to government agencies. The Department of Energy, like other federal agencies, relies heavily on contractors for program management support to ensure efficient and effective execution of its diverse missions. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for similar program management support services across various federal agencies.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) is not a primary focus for this specific task order. There is no indication of a small business set-aside. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist at the discretion of Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation, but they are not mandated by the contract terms presented. This suggests the contract is likely being performed by the prime contractor's internal resources or larger subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Program Management Support Services
- Engineering and Technical Services
- Department of Energy IT and Management Support Contracts
- Idaho National Laboratory Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost control risk due to Time and Materials contract type.
- Potential for scope creep without strict management.
- Dependence on contractor's internal performance metrics and reporting.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-energy, program-management, full-and-open-competition, time-and-materials, task-order, indefinite-delivery-contract, idaho, allegheny-science-technology-corporation
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $34.7 million to ALLEGHENY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION. PROGRAM INFORMATION COLLECTION SYSTEM AD SUPPORT SERVICES (PICSSS) - UNDER THIS TASK ORDER CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE EXPERTISE AND SERVICES TO IMPLEMENT INDUSTRY STANDARD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL PRINCIPLES TO INCLUDE PROJECT MANAG
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ALLEGHENY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $34.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-05-01. End: 2028-04-30.
What is the historical spending pattern for Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation with the Department of Energy?
To assess the historical spending pattern for Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation (ASTC) with the Department of Energy (DOE), one would need to query federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG or USASpending.gov for all contracts awarded to ASTC by the DOE. This analysis would reveal the total value of contracts awarded over time, the types of services provided, and the specific DOE sub-agencies or programs that have utilized ASTC's services. It would also highlight any trends in contract awards, such as increasing or decreasing reliance on ASTC, and identify any significant fluctuations in spending. Without direct access to this historical data, it's impossible to provide specific figures or trends. However, a pattern of consistent awards could indicate a strong working relationship and satisfaction with services, while a decline might suggest shifts in agency needs or increased competition.
How does the $34.7 million contract value compare to similar program management support contracts within the Department of Energy?
Comparing the $34.7 million contract value to similar program management support contracts within the Department of Energy (DOE) requires access to a broader dataset of DOE procurements. Program management support can vary significantly in scope and duration, influencing contract values. Contracts for high-level strategic program oversight or those supporting major infrastructure projects might exceed this amount, while smaller, more focused support tasks could be valued less. The $34.7 million over five years averages approximately $6.94 million annually. To benchmark effectively, one would look for contracts with similar service descriptions (e.g., program control, project management, technical expertise) awarded to other firms by the DOE or its various offices and laboratories. Factors like the specific program's complexity, criticality, and the number of personnel required would heavily influence value. Without a direct comparison set, it's difficult to definitively state if this contract represents high, low, or average spending for its category.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being measured?
The provided data does not explicitly list the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or the specific methods for measuring performance under this task order for Program Information Collection System AD Support Services (PICSSS). Typically, for program management and control services, KPIs might include metrics related to schedule adherence, budget management, risk mitigation effectiveness, quality of deliverables, and stakeholder satisfaction. Performance measurement would likely involve regular progress reports from Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation, reviews by DOE contracting officers' representatives (CORs), and potentially formal performance evaluations at key milestones or contractually defined periods. The Time and Materials (T&M) nature of the contract suggests that performance monitoring would focus heavily on the efficient and effective application of labor hours and resources towards achieving defined program objectives, rather than solely on output metrics.
What is the track record of Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation in delivering similar program management services to federal agencies?
Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation (ASTC) has a history of providing various technical and management support services to federal agencies, including the Department of Energy. Their track record in program management and control would be reflected in past performance evaluations within federal procurement systems. Agencies typically assess contractors on factors such as adherence to schedule and budget, quality of work, responsiveness, and overall customer satisfaction. A review of ASTC's contract history would reveal the types of programs they have supported, the scale of those engagements, and any documented performance feedback. Positive past performance is often a key factor in contract awards, especially for follow-on work or task orders under IDIQ vehicles. Without specific past performance reports for this PICSSS contract, a general assessment relies on their broader federal contracting history.
Are there any identified risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type for this program?
Yes, there are inherent risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, particularly for a program management support services contract valued at $34.7 million over five years. The primary risk is cost control. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts do not have a ceiling on the total cost, meaning the government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used. This can lead to cost overruns if the contractor is inefficient, if the scope of work expands unexpectedly without proper oversight, or if labor rates are higher than anticipated. To mitigate these risks, the Department of Energy must implement robust oversight, closely monitor labor hours and expenditures, ensure clear task definitions, and potentially negotiate labor hour ceilings or fixed-price components for specific deliverables within the T&M framework. Effective management and communication are crucial to ensure value for money.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 89243223RNE000032
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 125 PROFESSIONAL PL, BRIDGEPORT, WV, 26330
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $98,000,000
Exercised Options: $98,000,000
Current Obligation: $34,677,239
Actual Outlays: $27,897,188
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F053AA
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-05-01
Current End Date: 2028-04-30
Potential End Date: 2028-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-24
More Contracts from Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation
- Under This Task Order Contract the Contractor Will Provide Expertise and Services to Implement Industry Standard Program Management and Control Principles to Include Project Management, Program Integration, Cost and Schedule Management, Earned Value Reporting of Costs, Change Management, Quality Management, Resource Management, Communications Management, Standards and Best Practices Application, Strategic Planning, Process Improvement, Performance Measurement, Business Process Re-Engineering, Benchmarking, and Risk Management for DOE. the Contractor Will Also BE Required to Perform the Foregoing Range of Activities for Doe-Id and NE, AS Well AS Other DOE Offices AS Directed by Task Assignment From the Contracting Officer, and AS Delegated to the Contracting Officer Representative (COR). the Contractor Shall Furnish ALL Personnel, Facilities, Equipment, Material, Supplies, and Services (except AS MAY BE Expressly SET Forth in This Task Order AS Furnished by the Government) and Otherwise DO ALL Things Necessary for, or Incidental to, the Performance of the Scope of Work — $43.8M (Department of Energy)
- Provide Specialized Subject Matter Expertise to the Department of Energy Office of Technology Transitions (doe-Ott) in Support of a Variety of Mission Related Activities. Support Will Consist of Programmatic Program Analyst Staff Support; Executive a — $16.2M (Department of Energy)
- Operational and Technical Support Services (otss) for the Department of Energy's (DOE) Grid Deployment Office (GDO) Utilizing the Technical, Engineering, and Programmatic Services III (teps III) Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) — $11.0M (Department of Energy)
- NEW Task Order for Administrative Assistants to Support Doe-Id in Multiple Organizations — $6.9M (Department of Energy)
View all Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)