DOE awards $16.2M for specialized expertise to Allegheny Science & Technology Corp. in West Virginia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,209,214 ($16.2M)

Contractor: Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2020-09-04

End Date: 2026-03-03

Contract Duration: 2,006 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROVIDE SPECIALIZED SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS (DOE-OTT) IN SUPPORT OF A VARIETY OF MISSION RELATED ACTIVITIES. SUPPORT WILL CONSIST OF PROGRAMMATIC PROGRAM ANALYST STAFF SUPPORT; EXECUTIVE A

Place of Performance

Location: BRIDGEPORT, HARRISON County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26330

State: West Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $16.2 million to ALLEGHENY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION for work described as: PROVIDE SPECIALIZED SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS (DOE-OTT) IN SUPPORT OF A VARIETY OF MISSION RELATED ACTIVITIES. SUPPORT WILL CONSIST OF PROGRAMMATIC PROGRAM ANALYST STAFF SUPPORT; EXECUTIVE A Key points: 1. Contract provides programmatic analyst support for DOE's Office of Technology Transitions. 2. The contract duration spans over 5 years, indicating a long-term need for services. 3. Services are delivered on a labor-hours basis, allowing flexibility in resource allocation. 4. The award was made through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. West Virginia is the primary service location, potentially benefiting the local economy. 6. The contract value is substantial, reflecting the importance of the support provided.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $16.2 million over approximately 5.5 years suggests a moderate annual spend for specialized programmatic support. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for expert advisory services within government agencies is challenging without more granular data on the specific tasks and required expertise. However, the labor-hours pricing model allows for adjustments based on actual effort, which can be a cost-effective approach if managed efficiently. The absence of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes a definitive value-for-money assessment difficult, but the competitive award process implies a degree of price reasonableness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the nature of the competition suggests that multiple companies likely vied for this opportunity. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and encourages contractors to offer competitive terms and pricing to win the award.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process as it typically drives down costs and ensures the government receives the best possible value for its investment. It also promotes a more efficient allocation of resources by selecting the most capable and cost-effective provider.

Public Impact

The Department of Energy's Office of Technology Transitions (DOE-OTT) is the primary beneficiary, receiving specialized expertise to support its mission. The services delivered include programmatic analyst staff support and executive support, aiding in the management and execution of OTT's activities. The contract's primary geographic impact is in West Virginia, where Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation is located. The contract supports a specialized workforce in engineering and program analysis, contributing to the technical capabilities within the DOE ecosystem.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), which encompasses firms providing engineering consulting and design services. The Department of Energy, particularly its Office of Technology Transitions, relies on such expertise to evaluate, manage, and advance new technologies. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized technical and programmatic support to government agencies. The $16.2 million award is a significant but not extraordinary sum for a multi-year contract of this nature, reflecting the specialized knowledge required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits to the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary contractor, Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation, is likely a medium to large-sized business, and the contract's value supports this assumption. The focus is on securing specialized expertise rather than promoting small business participation through this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of Energy's Office of Technology Transitions. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement, including deliverables, reporting requirements, and quality standards. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting, although specific internal oversight processes are not detailed here. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-energy, doe-ott, programmatic-support, executive-support, labor-hours, full-and-open-competition, west-virginia, allegheny-science-technology-corporation, technology-transitions, multi-year-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $16.2 million to ALLEGHENY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION. PROVIDE SPECIALIZED SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS (DOE-OTT) IN SUPPORT OF A VARIETY OF MISSION RELATED ACTIVITIES. SUPPORT WILL CONSIST OF PROGRAMMATIC PROGRAM ANALYST STAFF SUPPORT; EXECUTIVE A

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALLEGHENY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-09-04. End: 2026-03-03.

What is the specific nature of the 'specialized subject matter expertise' provided to DOE-OTT?

The provided data indicates the expertise is in 'programmatic program analyst staff support' and 'executive support' for the Department of Energy Office of Technology Transitions (DOE-OTT). This suggests the contractor assists DOE-OTT in managing, evaluating, and advancing its mission-related activities, which likely involve the transition of technologies from research and development into practical applications. This could encompass tasks such as market analysis, policy development support, project portfolio management, stakeholder engagement, and strategic planning assistance. The exact technical domains of the expertise are not specified but are crucial for understanding the full scope of the support.

How does the $16.2 million contract value compare to similar DOE-OTT support contracts?

Direct comparison of the $16.2 million contract value to similar DOE-OTT support contracts is difficult without access to a comprehensive database of historical and current awards for this specific office and its functions. However, for multi-year contracts (2006 duration, ending in 2026) providing specialized programmatic and executive support, this value appears moderate. Government contracts for expert advisory and analytical services can range significantly based on the scope, duration, and level of expertise required. The full and open competition suggests the value was deemed appropriate through a market-driven process, but benchmarking against peer contracts would provide a clearer picture of its relative cost-effectiveness.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to assess Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation's performance under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for contracts involving programmatic and executive support, KPIs would focus on the quality and timeliness of deliverables, the effectiveness of analytical support provided, adherence to project milestones, responsiveness to requests, and overall client satisfaction. The performance work statement (PWS) or statement of work (SOW) would detail these requirements and how performance is measured. Without the PWS/SOW, a precise assessment of performance expectations and evaluation criteria is not possible.

What is the historical spending pattern for programmatic support at DOE-OTT?

The provided data offers limited insight into the historical spending patterns for programmatic support at DOE-OTT beyond this specific contract. This contract, awarded in September 2020 with an end date in March 2026, represents a significant investment over its duration. To understand historical patterns, one would need to analyze prior contracts awarded to DOE-OTT for similar services, looking at total spending, average contract values, and the number of contractors utilized over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in resource allocation and the evolution of support needs within the office.

What is the risk associated with relying on Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation for over five years of support?

The primary risk associated with relying on a single contractor, Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation, for over five years of specialized support is potential vendor lock-in and a possible decline in performance or innovation over time if not actively managed. If the contractor becomes complacent or if their expertise becomes outdated, the DOE-OTT could face challenges in adapting to new needs. Mitigating this risk involves robust contract management, regular performance reviews, clear communication channels, and potentially incorporating mechanisms for re-competition or performance-based adjustments throughout the contract lifecycle. The competitive nature of the initial award helps mitigate initial risk.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 125 PROFESSIONAL PL, BRIDGEPORT, WV, 26330

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,265,331

Exercised Options: $20,265,331

Current Obligation: $16,209,214

Actual Outlays: $15,308,058

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $437,928

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F053AA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-09-04

Current End Date: 2026-03-03

Potential End Date: 2026-03-03 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-26

More Contracts from Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation

View all Allegheny Science & Technology Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending