DOE awards $2.59M for facilities support at Arkansas training site, competed under SAP

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,590,010 ($2.6M)

Contractor: Alutiiq Logistics & Maintenance Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2025-04-03

End Date: 2026-04-02

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR OST-TRANSPORTATION SAFEGUARDS TRAINING SITE (OST-TSTS), FORT CHAFFEE, ARKANSAS

Place of Performance

Location: BARLING, SEBASTIAN County, ARKANSAS, 72923

State: Arkansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $2.6 million to ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR OST-TRANSPORTATION SAFEGUARDS TRAINING SITE (OST-TSTS), FORT CHAFFEE, ARKANSAS Key points: 1. The contract value of $2.59 million for one year of facilities support appears reasonable given the scope. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially efficient price discovery process under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm-fixed-price contract type and a single-year base period. 4. Performance context involves essential training site operations, suggesting a critical service. 5. Sector positioning is within facilities management and support services for government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.59 million for facilities support services at the OST-Transportation Safeguards Training Site (OST-TSTS) in Fort Chaffee, Arkansas, appears to be within a reasonable range for a one-year duration. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts for training sites of comparable size and complexity would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which allows for a streamlined procurement process for acquisitions valued below the SAT. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP generally encourages competition among eligible vendors. The use of SAP suggests that adequate competition was likely achieved for this contract value, contributing to fair price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of SAP for this contract likely resulted in a more efficient procurement process and potentially better pricing for taxpayers compared to a lengthy, full-scale competitive process for a contract of this value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Energy and its personnel requiring the OST-Transportation Safeguards Training Site. Services delivered include essential facilities support, ensuring the operational readiness of the training site. The geographic impact is localized to Fort Chaffee, Arkansas, where the training site is located. Workforce implications may include local employment opportunities for facilities maintenance and support staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services encompass a broad range of activities necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. This contract falls within the broader facilities management and support services sector, which is a significant market for government contractors. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar training facilities or operational sites would provide further context on the pricing and scope of this award.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The competition was likely open to a range of businesses capable of providing these services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team within the Department of Energy. Performance monitoring and quality assurance measures would be in place to ensure the contractor meets the requirements of the firm-fixed-price contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting mechanisms.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support, department-of-energy, arkansas, competed, sap, firm-fixed-price, training-site, logistics, maintenance, doe, fort-chaffee

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $2.6 million to ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR OST-TRANSPORTATION SAFEGUARDS TRAINING SITE (OST-TSTS), FORT CHAFFEE, ARKANSAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-03. End: 2026-04-02.

What is the track record of Alutiiq Logistics & Maintenance Services, LLC with the Department of Energy or similar agencies?

A review of Alutiiq Logistics & Maintenance Services, LLC's contract history would be necessary to assess their track record. This would involve examining past performance on similar facilities support contracts, their history of meeting deadlines and quality standards, and any past performance issues or disputes. Understanding their experience with government agencies, particularly the Department of Energy, and their ability to manage complex logistics and maintenance operations is crucial for evaluating their suitability for this contract. Specific details on their past performance ratings and any awards or commendations would provide further insight into their reliability and capability.

How does the awarded price of $2.59 million compare to market rates for similar facilities support services?

To benchmark the awarded price of $2.59 million, a detailed analysis of the contract's scope of work is required. This would involve comparing the specific services (e.g., maintenance, janitorial, groundskeeping, security support) and the size/complexity of the OST-Transportation Safeguards Training Site against publicly available data for similar facilities. Industry reports on facilities management costs, government contract databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov), and pricing data from other agencies' awarded contracts for comparable services can be used. Without this detailed comparison, it's difficult to definitively state if the price is high or low, but the firm-fixed-price nature suggests the contractor has priced competitively to win the award.

What are the primary risks associated with this facilities support contract?

The primary risks associated with this facilities support contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, leading to disruptions in training site operations. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, there's a risk of the contractor cutting corners on quality to maintain profitability, especially if unforeseen issues arise. Another risk is the potential for scope creep if the government's needs evolve beyond the initial contract statement of work, which could lead to change order negotiations. Ensuring adequate oversight and clear communication channels will be critical to mitigating these risks and ensuring the successful delivery of services.

How effective are the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) in ensuring value for money for contracts of this size?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed to streamline the procurement process for acquisitions below the SAT, aiming to reduce administrative burden and expedite delivery. For contracts of this size ($2.59 million), SAP can be effective in ensuring value for money by allowing for quicker competition and reducing the overhead associated with more complex procurement methods. However, the effectiveness is contingent on the quality of competition achieved. If SAP leads to fewer bidders or less rigorous evaluation, it could potentially result in suboptimal pricing. The Department of Energy's internal policies and the specific implementation of SAP for this procurement would influence the extent to which value for money was maximized.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at Fort Chaffee or similar DOE training sites?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services at Fort Chaffee or similar Department of Energy (DOE) training sites would provide valuable context for the current $2.59 million award. This would involve reviewing past contracts for these services, noting their duration, value, and any changes in scope or pricing over time. Significant year-over-year increases or decreases in spending could indicate shifts in operational needs, contractor performance, or market conditions. Understanding this history helps in assessing whether the current contract represents a fair market price and if the scope aligns with historical requirements or reflects new demands.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITYOPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 89233125QNA000383

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Afognak Native Corporation

Address: 3909 ARCTIC BLVD STE 500, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,011,267

Exercised Options: $5,375,905

Current Obligation: $2,590,010

Actual Outlays: $1,586,696

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $167,236

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 89233125ANA000030

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-04-03

Current End Date: 2026-04-02

Potential End Date: 2030-04-02 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-24

More Contracts from Alutiiq Logistics & Maintenance Services, LLC

View all Alutiiq Logistics & Maintenance Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending