DOE awards $28.6M for Albuquerque facilities support, highlighting long-term service needs
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,574,656 ($28.6M)
Contractor: Alutiiq Logistics & Maintenance Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2020-02-05
End Date: 2025-05-02
Contract Duration: 1,913 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: DOE/NNSA FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES IN ALBUQUERQUE, NM (AC-SFO TASK ORDER)
Place of Performance
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, BERNALILLO County, NEW MEXICO, 87185
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $28.6 million to ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: DOE/NNSA FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES IN ALBUQUERQUE, NM (AC-SFO TASK ORDER) Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical national security infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics for this large-scale facilities support contract are crucial for ensuring cost-effectiveness. 3. Performance risk is moderate, given the established nature of facilities support services. 4. This contract aligns with the Department of Energy's ongoing mission to manage complex operational sites. 5. The sector for facilities support services is highly competitive, with many established players. 6. Long-term contract durations can offer stability but require vigilant oversight to prevent cost creep.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of $28.6 million over approximately five years suggests a substantial but potentially reasonable cost for comprehensive facilities support at a major federal site. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for Department of Energy or other federal agencies would be necessary for a definitive value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure generally provides cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope of work is well-defined and managed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the initial solicitation may have had some restrictions, it ultimately allowed for broad participation. The specific details of 'after exclusion of sources' would need further investigation to understand if any specific technologies or capabilities were initially limited. However, the 'full and open' designation suggests a competitive process that aimed to solicit bids from a wide range of qualified contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation, leading to better value for public funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration, ensuring the operational readiness of their facilities in Albuquerque. Services delivered include a broad range of facility maintenance, operations, and support functions essential for national security missions. The geographic impact is concentrated in Albuquerque, New Mexico, supporting federal operations within that region. Workforce implications include the potential for significant employment opportunities for skilled trades, maintenance personnel, and administrative staff in the Albuquerque area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not meticulously managed under the firm-fixed-price contract.
- Ensuring consistent service quality across all facilities support functions requires robust performance monitoring.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical infrastructure support necessitates strong contingency planning.
- The long duration of the contract could lead to complacency if oversight is not maintained.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the government.
- Awarding to a single contractor for a comprehensive suite of services can lead to efficiencies and streamlined management.
- The 'full and open' competition suggests a robust selection process that likely identified a capable provider.
- The contract duration allows for long-term planning and investment in facility upkeep.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services is a broad category encompassing a wide range of activities necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. This sector is critical for government agencies, military installations, and large commercial enterprises. The market is characterized by numerous providers, ranging from small, specialized firms to large, diversified companies. Spending in this sector is often driven by the need to maintain aging infrastructure, ensure operational continuity, and meet regulatory compliance. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at per-square-foot maintenance costs or contract values for similar-sized federal facilities.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large-scale facilities support services contract awarded through full and open competition, it is likely that the prime contractor, ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC, is a larger entity. While there is no direct small business set-aside, the prime contractor may be required to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their contractual obligations, contributing to the small business ecosystem. Further analysis of the subcontracting plan would be needed to assess the specific impact.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's performance work statement, with penalties or incentives tied to meeting service level agreements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting mechanisms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract's performance.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Facilities Operations
- National Nuclear Security Administration Infrastructure Management
- Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Government Support Services
- Base Operations Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
- Risk of service quality degradation over the contract term.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical infrastructure operations.
- Need for continuous government oversight to ensure value and performance.
- Potential for outdated practices if innovation is not incentivized.
Tags
department-of-energy, national-nuclear-security-administration, facilities-support-services, albuquerque, new-mexico, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, long-term-contract, infrastructure-maintenance, operational-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $28.6 million to ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC. DOE/NNSA FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES IN ALBUQUERQUE, NM (AC-SFO TASK ORDER)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-02-05. End: 2025-05-02.
What is the track record of ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC with the Department of Energy and similar federal agencies?
ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC has a history of performing various support services for federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy. Their experience often includes logistics, maintenance, and facilities management. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those with the DOE, would reveal their ability to meet performance requirements, manage costs, and adhere to schedules. A review of past performance evaluations and any documented issues or commendations would provide crucial insight into their reliability and capability for this significant Albuquerque facilities support task order.
How does the $28.6 million contract value compare to historical spending on facilities support at this specific DOE/NNSA site?
To assess the value, we would need historical spending data for facilities support services at the Albuquerque site (AC-SFO). Comparing the current $28.6 million award over its approximate 5-year duration (1913 days) to previous contract values for similar services at this location would indicate whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable. Factors such as inflation, changes in facility scope or condition, and evolving service requirements would need to be considered in this comparison. A significant deviation from historical spending patterns, without clear justification, could warrant further investigation into cost-effectiveness.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract, and how are they monitored?
The specific KPIs and SLAs for this contract would be detailed within the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Typically, for facilities support services, these would include metrics related to response times for maintenance requests, preventive maintenance completion rates, energy efficiency targets, safety compliance, groundskeeping standards, and janitorial service quality. Monitoring would likely involve regular reporting by the contractor, government inspections, user feedback surveys, and periodic performance review meetings between the DOE and ALUTIIQ LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that meeting these KPIs/SLAs is critical for the contractor to achieve full payment and avoid penalties.
What is the potential impact of 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' on the overall cost and quality of services?
The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests that while the competition was broad, there might have been initial specific requirements or exclusions that narrowed the field before the final 'full and open' phase. This could mean that the government had specific needs that only a subset of the market could initially meet, but then opened it up further. If the exclusion was based on highly specialized technology or security requirements, it might limit the pool of bidders, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly unrestricted competition. However, if the exclusion was minor or later removed, the 'full and open' aspect should have driven competitive pricing and quality improvements. The ultimate impact depends on the nature and significance of the initial exclusion.
Are there any specific risks associated with the long contract duration (approx. 5 years) for facilities support services?
Yes, long contract durations for facilities support services carry inherent risks. One primary risk is 'contractor complacency,' where the incumbent contractor may reduce efforts or innovate less once they feel secure in their position. Another risk is 'scope creep,' where the scope of work may expand over time without commensurate price adjustments if not managed tightly. Furthermore, technology and best practices in facilities management evolve, and a long-term contract might delay the adoption of newer, more efficient methods. Finally, the government's ability to adapt to changing needs or to switch to a potentially better-performing contractor is limited during the contract period, necessitating robust oversight and change management processes.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 89233119RNA000038
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Afognak Native Corporation
Address: 3909 ARCTIC BLVD STE 500, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $31,323,415
Exercised Options: $31,323,415
Current Obligation: $28,574,656
Actual Outlays: $24,195,884
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 41
Total Subaward Amount: $7,460,141
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 89233120DNA000026
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-02-05
Current End Date: 2025-05-02
Potential End Date: 2025-05-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-07-08
More Contracts from Alutiiq Logistics & Maintenance Services, LLC
- N6247325D0013 - Base Operating Support (BOS) Contract Naws China Lake, Base Year Funding Task Order — $23.0M (Department of Defense)
- Option Year 4 the Purpose of This Task Order IS to Fund BOS Contr — $20.6M (Department of Defense)
- Option YR 2 the Purpose of This Task Order IS to Fund BOS Contrac — $19.1M (Department of Defense)
- THE Contractor Will Provide Facility Support Services for Sandia Field Office, Albuquerque, NEW Mexico — $13.8M (Department of Energy)
- THE Contractor Will Provide Facilities Support Services for Office of Secure Transportation (OST), Albuquerque, NEW Mexico — $3.8M (Department of Energy)
View all Alutiiq Logistics & Maintenance Services, LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)