DOE/NNSA's TEPS II BPA awarded $20.4M for technical support, with 4 delivery orders issued
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,407,993 ($20.4M)
Contractor: Techsource, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2020-10-01
End Date: 2024-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,277 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF:CL:IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT SERVICES II (TEPS II) BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) HOLDERS--RFQ 89233120QNA000137 TECHNICAL SUPPO
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $20.4 million to TECHSOURCE, LLC for work described as: IGF:CL:IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT SERVICES II (TEPS II) BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) HOLDERS--RFQ 89233120QNA000137 TECHNICAL SUPPO Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair, given the broad scope of technical, engineering, and programmatic support required. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open approach, suggesting a competitive environment for these services. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, typical for large-scale support contracts with multiple task orders. 4. Performance context is within the National Nuclear Security Administration's mission-critical operations. 5. Sector positioning is within engineering and technical services supporting government agencies.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award of $20.4 million over approximately 2.5 years for technical, engineering, and programmatic support services is a significant investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale support contracts for federal agencies suggests this level of spending is within expected ranges for specialized technical expertise. However, a detailed cost-benefit analysis would be needed to fully assess value for money, considering the breadth of services covered under the BPA.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows 4 delivery orders were issued against the Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). The level of competition for the initial BPA award is not explicitly detailed, but the full and open nature suggests a robust bidding process, which generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition allows for a wider range of potential contractors to bid, increasing the likelihood of competitive pricing and innovative solutions, which benefits taxpayers by ensuring they receive good value for the services procured.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration, receiving essential technical and programmatic support. Services delivered include a wide range of technical, engineering, and programmatic support critical to NNSA's mission. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the Department of Energy is headquartered. Workforce implications involve the employment of skilled engineers, scientists, and program managers by the contractor to fulfill the contract requirements.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep given the broad nature of 'technical, engineering, and programmatic support'.
- Dependence on a single BPA holder could limit future flexibility if not managed carefully.
- Ensuring consistent quality across multiple delivery orders requires robust oversight.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive landscape that can drive better pricing.
- The BPA structure allows for flexibility in ordering services as needed.
- The contract supports critical national security missions of the NNSA.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) sector, which is a significant segment of the federal contracting market. This sector encompasses firms providing specialized engineering expertise to government agencies. The total spending on engineering services by the federal government is in the billions annually, with agencies like the Department of Energy consistently investing in technical and programmatic support to manage complex projects and maintain critical infrastructure.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside criterion for this particular award. While the BPA itself may have been competed broadly, the prime contractor, TECHSOURCE, LLC, is not identified as a small business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this data, which warrants further investigation to understand the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards, reporting requirements, and payment schedules tied to deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics and specific oversight activities are often internal.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Technical Support Services
- National Nuclear Security Administration Programmatic Support
- Engineering and Technical Consulting Services
- Federal Blanket Purchase Agreements
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
- Need for robust oversight to ensure consistent quality across delivery orders.
- Limited visibility into small business subcontracting opportunities.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-energy, national-nuclear-security-administration, blanket-purchase-agreement, technical-support, programmatic-support, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, district-of-columbia, labor-hours
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $20.4 million to TECHSOURCE, LLC. IGF:CL:IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT SERVICES II (TEPS II) BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) HOLDERS--RFQ 89233120QNA000137 TECHNICAL SUPPO
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TECHSOURCE, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-10-01. End: 2024-03-31.
What is the track record of TECHSOURCE, LLC in performing similar technical, engineering, and programmatic support services for the federal government?
TECHSOURCE, LLC has a history of providing various support services to federal agencies. While specific details on past performance for contracts identical in scope to TEPS II are not provided in this data snippet, their presence as a BPA holder suggests they have met pre-qualification criteria. A deeper dive into their contract history, past performance reviews, and any documented issues or successes on similar engagements would be necessary to fully assess their track record. This would involve reviewing federal procurement databases and agency performance reports to understand their reliability, quality of service, and ability to manage complex technical requirements.
How does the awarded amount of $20.4 million compare to historical spending on similar NNSA technical support contracts?
The $20.4 million awarded over approximately 2.5 years for the TEPS II BPA represents a substantial but not necessarily outlier figure for specialized technical, engineering, and programmatic support within the NNSA. Historical spending patterns for NNSA support services can vary significantly based on mission needs, project lifecycles, and the specific nature of the support required. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze NNSA's spending on comparable support contracts over similar timeframes, considering factors like contract type, scope of work, and the number of contractors involved. Without this comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state if this award is high, low, or average relative to past investments.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of the TEPS II contract, and how is performance being monitored?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for the TEPS II contract. Typically, for technical, engineering, and programmatic support services, KPIs would likely include metrics related to technical accuracy, timeliness of deliverables, adherence to project schedules, cost control, and overall client satisfaction. Performance monitoring would be conducted by the NNSA's contracting officer's representative (COR) and program managers, who would review contractor reports, conduct regular progress meetings, and assess the quality of work against contract requirements. Formal performance evaluations, such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports, would also be a crucial component of monitoring.
What is the potential risk associated with relying on a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for such critical support services?
Relying on a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for critical support services like those under TEPS II carries several potential risks. While BPAs offer flexibility and streamlined ordering, they can sometimes lead to less rigorous competition for individual task orders compared to a full and open competition for each requirement. There's also a risk of 'scope creep' if the BPA's scope is too broadly defined, potentially leading to costs exceeding initial estimates. Furthermore, over-reliance on a single BPA, even with multiple holders, could limit the agency's ability to access specialized expertise from other sources or to benefit from new market entrants. Effective management, clear task order definitions, and ongoing performance monitoring are crucial to mitigate these risks.
How does the 'full and open competition' designation for the BPA award impact the government's ability to secure competitive pricing?
The designation of 'full and open competition' for the TEPS II BPA award is a positive indicator for the government's ability to secure competitive pricing. This means that all responsible sources were allowed to submit proposals, fostering a competitive environment where multiple companies vied for the contract. This broad competition typically drives down prices as contractors strive to offer the most cost-effective solutions to win the award. While the BPA itself is competed broadly, the pricing for individual delivery orders issued against it will also be subject to competitive processes or pre-negotiated rates that reflect the initial competitive award, ultimately benefiting taxpayers through potentially lower costs for essential services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 89233120QNA000137
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1475 CENTRAL AVE, LOS ALAMOS, NM, 87544
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,407,993
Exercised Options: $20,407,993
Current Obligation: $20,407,993
Actual Outlays: $17,339,017
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 6
Total Subaward Amount: $7,062,505
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F003DA
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-10-01
Current End Date: 2024-03-31
Potential End Date: 2024-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-12-17
More Contracts from Techsource, LLC
- Igf:cl:igf U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's (doe/Nnsa) Technical, Engineering, and Programmatic Support Services II (teps II) Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Holders--Rfq 89233120QNA000116 Technical Suppo — $28.9M (Department of Energy)
- Liaison, Technical, Program, and Strategic Communications Support Services to the Office of the Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs (NA-10) — $25.3M (Department of Energy)
- Requisition 19MA002035 WAS Created to Provide Project Management Support to the Department of Energy. the Period of Performance IS: Base Year: 09/13/19 to 09/12/20 Option Year 1: 09/13/20 to 09/12/21 Option Year 2: 09/13/21 to 09/12/22 Option YEA — $21.5M (Department of Energy)
- Technical Support Services for the Doe/Nnsa Office of Production Modernization (NA-19) — $20.1M (Department of Energy)
- Doe/Nnsa, Teps III (BPA), Technical Support Services for the Office of Production Modernization (NA-19) — $19.3M (Department of Energy)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)