DOE/NNSA's TEPS II BPA awards $28.9M for technical, engineering, and programmatic support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,912,179 ($28.9M)
Contractor: Techsource, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2020-10-01
End Date: 2026-02-26
Contract Duration: 1,974 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF:CL:IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT SERVICES II (TEPS II) BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) HOLDERS--RFQ 89233120QNA000116 TECHNICAL SUPPO
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $28.9 million to TECHSOURCE, LLC for work described as: IGF:CL:IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT SERVICES II (TEPS II) BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) HOLDERS--RFQ 89233120QNA000116 TECHNICAL SUPPO Key points: 1. Contract provides essential technical and engineering support to the NNSA. 2. The BPA structure allows for flexible task order issuance. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 4. Contract duration extends through February 2026, indicating long-term needs. 5. The contract type is labor hours, common for service-based support. 6. Small business participation is not explicitly noted, warranting further review.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award amount of $28.9 million for technical, engineering, and programmatic support services appears reasonable given the contract's duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar support contracts within the Department of Energy or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value assessment. The labor hour contract type allows for flexibility, but requires careful monitoring to ensure efficient resource utilization and prevent cost overruns. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive value-for-money judgment is challenging, but the competitive nature of the award suggests a degree of price efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competitive process. This approach is designed to foster price discovery and ensure the government receives the best possible value by leveraging market competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through competitive bidding, leading to more cost-effective use of public funds.
Public Impact
The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) benefits from specialized technical and engineering expertise. Services delivered include critical programmatic support for NNSA missions. The contract's primary impact is within the District of Columbia, where the NNSA is headquartered. The contract supports a workforce of technical and engineering professionals.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in labor hour contracts if not managed tightly.
- Dependence on a limited number of BPA holders could reduce future competition.
- Ensuring consistent quality of services across multiple task orders requires robust oversight.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services.
- Long-term contract provides stability for critical NNSA support functions.
- BPA structure allows for agile response to evolving NNSA needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting government agencies with technical, engineering, and programmatic expertise. The market for such services is substantial, driven by the ongoing need for specialized knowledge in complex government operations, particularly in areas like national security and energy. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale support service contracts awarded to engineering firms by federal entities.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false for this specific award. This suggests that the primary awardee is not a small business, and there is no explicit set-aside for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses under this BPA, which could still provide some benefit to the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the task orders issued under the BPA, defining deliverables, performance standards, and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed task order specifics may be less publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Technical Support Services
- Engineering Consulting Services
- Program Management Support
- National Nuclear Security Administration Contracts
- Department of Energy Blanket Purchase Agreements
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in labor hour contracts.
- Need for robust oversight to manage scope and performance.
- Limited visibility into specific task order details and performance metrics.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-energy, national-nuclear-security-administration, blanket-purchase-agreement, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, labor-hours, district-of-columbia, technical-support, programmatic-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $28.9 million to TECHSOURCE, LLC. IGF:CL:IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT SERVICES II (TEPS II) BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) HOLDERS--RFQ 89233120QNA000116 TECHNICAL SUPPO
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TECHSOURCE, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-10-01. End: 2026-02-26.
What is the historical spending trend for technical, engineering, and programmatic support services at the NNSA?
Analyzing historical spending trends for technical, engineering, and programmatic support services at the NNSA is crucial for understanding budget allocation and identifying potential patterns of increased or decreased reliance on external contractors. While specific historical data for the TEPS II BPA is not provided, a broader review of NNSA's contracting history would reveal if spending in this category has been consistent, growing, or declining. Factors such as shifts in national security priorities, technological advancements, and internal workforce capabilities can influence these trends. For instance, a period of increased investment in nuclear modernization might correlate with higher spending on engineering and technical support. Conversely, efforts to build internal capacity could lead to a reduction in outsourced services. Understanding these trends helps in forecasting future needs and evaluating the long-term strategic value of such contracts.
How does the pricing structure of this contract compare to similar engineering support contracts awarded by other federal agencies?
Comparing the pricing structure of this contract to similar engineering support contracts requires access to detailed pricing data for comparable awards, including labor rates, overhead, and profit margins. The current data indicates a 'labor hours' contract type, which is common for service-based procurements. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify contracts with similar scopes of work (e.g., technical, engineering, programmatic support) awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense, NASA, or other science and technology-focused organizations. Key comparison points would include average hourly rates for different labor categories (e.g., engineers, technicians, project managers), indirect cost rates, and the typical profit margins allowed. Variations in pricing can be attributed to differences in geographic location, security clearance requirements, complexity of the work, and the level of competition. A significant deviation from established benchmarks could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing, necessitating further investigation.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of the TEPS II BPA, and how has the contractor performed against them?
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the Technical, Engineering, and Programmatic Support Services II (TEPS II) BPA are essential for objectively measuring the contractor's performance and ensuring the NNSA receives the intended value. While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, typical metrics for such contracts often include on-time delivery of reports and milestones, quality of technical analyses and recommendations, responsiveness to NNSA requests, adherence to budget constraints for task orders, and overall customer satisfaction. Performance against these KPIs would be tracked through regular progress reports, performance reviews, and feedback from NNSA program managers. A robust performance management system would allow the NNSA to identify areas of excellence and address any deficiencies promptly, potentially through corrective action plans or adjustments to future task orders. The success of the BPA hinges on the effective implementation and monitoring of these performance metrics.
What is the track record of TECHSOURCE, LLC in delivering similar technical and engineering support services to the federal government?
TECHSOURCE, LLC's track record in delivering similar technical and engineering support services to the federal government is a critical factor in assessing the reliability and capability of this contractor. A thorough review would involve examining past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous government contracts. This includes looking at the types of services provided, the agencies served, contract values, and contract durations. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) and past performance questionnaires can offer insights into their performance history. A history of successful contract completions, positive performance reviews, and minimal disputes would indicate a lower risk associated with awarding this BPA. Conversely, any significant past performance issues, such as contract terminations, performance disputes, or findings of non-compliance, would raise concerns and warrant closer scrutiny of their current capabilities and proposed approach.
What are the potential risks associated with a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) structure for long-term technical support, and how are they mitigated?
Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) offer flexibility but also present potential risks, particularly for long-term technical support. One primary risk is the potential for uncontrolled spending if task orders are not carefully managed and monitored against established budgets and scope. Another concern is the possibility of 'scope creep,' where the requirements of task orders expand beyond the original intent without adequate adjustments to cost and schedule. Furthermore, if the BPA is awarded to a limited number of vendors, it could reduce future competition and potentially lead to less favorable pricing over time. Mitigation strategies typically involve strong government oversight, clearly defined ceilings for individual task orders, regular reviews of spending patterns, and robust performance management processes. For the TEPS II BPA, the NNSA would need to ensure diligent management of each task order, maintain clear communication with TECHSOURCE, LLC, and periodically reassess the need for the BPA and the competitive landscape.
How does this contract align with the NNSA's strategic goals related to nuclear security and technological advancement?
This contract for Technical, Engineering, and Programmatic Support Services II (TEPS II) directly aligns with the NNSA's strategic goals by providing essential expertise to support its core missions. The NNSA is responsible for advancing U.S. national security policies related to the prevention of nuclear proliferation and the promotion of nuclear safety and security. Technical and engineering support are critical for maintaining and modernizing the nation's nuclear stockpile, ensuring the safety and security of nuclear materials, and responding to potential nuclear threats. Programmatic support helps in the efficient planning, execution, and oversight of complex NNSA initiatives. By securing these services through a competitive BPA, the NNSA can ensure access to specialized skills needed for technological advancements in areas such as materials science, computational modeling, and advanced manufacturing, all of which are vital for maintaining a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent and managing nuclear risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 89233120QNA000116
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1475 CENTRAL AVE, LOS ALAMOS, NM, 87544
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $31,672,055
Exercised Options: $31,672,055
Current Obligation: $28,912,179
Actual Outlays: $26,570,455
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $1,364,200
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F003DA
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-02-26
Potential End Date: 2026-02-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-26
More Contracts from Techsource, LLC
- Liaison, Technical, Program, and Strategic Communications Support Services to the Office of the Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs (NA-10) — $25.3M (Department of Energy)
- Requisition 19MA002035 WAS Created to Provide Project Management Support to the Department of Energy. the Period of Performance IS: Base Year: 09/13/19 to 09/12/20 Option Year 1: 09/13/20 to 09/12/21 Option Year 2: 09/13/21 to 09/12/22 Option YEA — $21.5M (Department of Energy)
- Igf:cl:igf U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's (doe/Nnsa) Technical, Engineering, and Programmatic Support Services II (teps II) Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Holders--Rfq 89233120QNA000137 Technical Suppo — $20.4M (Department of Energy)
- Technical Support Services for the Doe/Nnsa Office of Production Modernization (NA-19) — $20.1M (Department of Energy)
- Doe/Nnsa, Teps III (BPA), Technical Support Services for the Office of Production Modernization (NA-19) — $19.3M (Department of Energy)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)