National Archives parking garage repair contract awarded to Grunley Construction for $2.47M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,471,691 ($2.5M)

Contractor: Grunley Construction CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: National Archives and Records Administration

Start Date: 2025-09-15

End Date: 2026-09-14

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: THIS IS A FIRM-FIXED-PRICE TASK ORDER FOR PARKING GARAGE REPAIR AT A2 FACILITY FOR THE POP: 9/15/2025 - 9/14/2026

Place of Performance

Location: COLLEGE PARK, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20740

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Archives and Records Administration obligated $2.5 million to GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: THIS IS A FIRM-FIXED-PRICE TASK ORDER FOR PARKING GARAGE REPAIR AT A2 FACILITY FOR THE POP: 9/15/2025 - 9/14/2026 Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the scope of structural repairs and a fixed-price contract. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, likely leading to fair pricing. 3. The contract duration of one year aligns with the scope of a specific repair project. 4. Performance risk is mitigated by the firm-fixed-price structure, transferring cost overruns to the contractor. 5. This contract falls within the broader category of commercial and institutional building construction. 6. The contractor, Grunley Construction, has a history of performing similar construction services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's firm-fixed-price nature provides cost certainty for the government. Benchmarking against similar facility repair projects would offer a more precise value assessment, but the price appears within a reasonable range for a year-long repair project of this nature. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is procuring a specific service, and the price reflects the expected costs for materials, labor, and contractor profit for this defined scope.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This typically involves a public solicitation and a competitive bidding process. The number of bidders is not specified, but the method suggests a robust competition that should drive prices toward market rates.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple contractors to offer their best pricing and terms to secure the award, thereby maximizing the value of federal dollars.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the National Archives and Records Administration, ensuring the structural integrity and safety of its facilities. The services delivered include essential repairs to a parking garage, preventing further deterioration and ensuring usability. The geographic impact is localized to the A2 Facility in Maryland. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction labor and skilled trades employed by Grunley Construction.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of undertaking repair and maintenance projects. Federal spending in this area supports infrastructure upkeep across various agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other NARA facility maintenance contracts or similar government building repair projects.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. As a full and open competition, small businesses were eligible to bid, but their participation level is not detailed. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether any small businesses were prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the National Archives and Records Administration's contracting officers and facility managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring completion of specified repairs. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though specific oversight reports or inspector general involvement would depend on the project's complexity and any identified issues.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, facility-maintenance, national-archives-and-records-administration, maryland, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, parking-garage-repair, infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Archives and Records Administration awarded $2.5 million to GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. THIS IS A FIRM-FIXED-PRICE TASK ORDER FOR PARKING GARAGE REPAIR AT A2 FACILITY FOR THE POP: 9/15/2025 - 9/14/2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Archives and Records Administration (National Archives and Records Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-15. End: 2026-09-14.

What is Grunley Construction's track record with federal contracts, particularly with NARA?

Grunley Construction Co., Inc. has a history of performing construction services for federal agencies. While specific details on their past contracts with NARA are not provided in this data, their designation under NAICS code 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction) suggests they are qualified for this type of work. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would reveal the full scope and performance history of their previous federal awards, including any prior work with NARA, to assess their reliability and experience with government projects.

How does the $2.47 million price compare to similar parking garage repair projects for federal facilities?

Benchmarking this $2.47 million contract against similar federal parking garage repair projects requires access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts. Factors such as the size of the garage, the extent of structural damage, the materials used, and the prevailing labor costs in the specific geographic region (Maryland, in this case) significantly influence pricing. Without specific details on these comparable projects, it's difficult to definitively state if this price is high or low. However, the full and open competition suggests the price was vetted against market offerings.

What are the primary risks associated with this parking garage repair contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential unforeseen structural issues discovered during the repair process that could necessitate change orders, increasing the total cost and extending the timeline beyond the current scope. Another risk involves potential delays due to material procurement challenges or supply chain disruptions, especially for specialized repair materials. Contractor performance risk is somewhat mitigated by the firm-fixed-price contract, but ensuring adherence to quality standards and timely completion remains a key oversight concern for NARA.

How effective is a firm-fixed-price contract for managing the costs of building repairs?

A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract is generally considered effective for managing costs in situations where the scope of work is well-defined and the risks of unforeseen conditions are manageable. For building repairs, FFP transfers the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, providing the government with cost certainty. This encourages the contractor to manage their costs efficiently. However, if significant unforeseen issues arise, the government may need to issue change orders, which can increase the total contract value and require careful negotiation.

What is the historical spending pattern for parking garage maintenance and repair at NARA?

Historical spending data for parking garage maintenance and repair at NARA is not provided in the current dataset. To analyze this, one would need to review NARA's past contract awards related to facilities management and infrastructure over several fiscal years. This would involve searching procurement databases for keywords like 'parking garage,' 'repair,' 'maintenance,' and 'facility' associated with NARA. Understanding historical spending would help contextualize the current $2.47 million award and identify any trends or significant changes in investment in facility upkeep.

What are the implications of the contract duration (364 days) for the project's success?

A contract duration of 364 days for a parking garage repair project suggests a comprehensive scope of work that requires a full year for completion. This duration allows for detailed planning, execution of various repair phases, and potential weather-related delays without immediately impacting the project's adherence to schedule. For NARA, this timeframe provides a reasonable period to expect the necessary repairs to be completed, ensuring the facility's continued usability and safety. It also allows for focused oversight throughout the project lifecycle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 15020 SHADY GROVE RD STE 500, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20850

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,471,691

Exercised Options: $2,471,691

Current Obligation: $2,471,691

Actual Outlays: $873,470

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 88310320D00010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-15

Current End Date: 2026-09-14

Potential End Date: 2026-09-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-30

More Contracts from Grunley Construction CO., Inc.

View all Grunley Construction CO., Inc. federal contracts →

Other National Archives and Records Administration Contracts

View all National Archives and Records Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending