HUD awards $498,694 for hospital risk management, but competition was limited
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $498,694 ($498.7K)
Contractor: Summit Consulting LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development
Start Date: 2019-06-03
End Date: 2019-12-02
Contract Duration: 182 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR HOSPITALS
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20001
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $498,693.81 to SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC for work described as: RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR HOSPITALS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized risk management services. 2. Limited competition raises concerns about optimal pricing and value. 3. Short contract duration suggests a focused, tactical engagement. 4. Services align with administrative management consulting, a common government need. 5. Geographic focus on Washington D.C. may indicate specific regional requirements.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of approximately $498,694 for risk management services seems within a reasonable range for specialized consulting. However, without a competitive bidding process, it's difficult to benchmark against market rates or determine if this represents the best value for the government. The fixed-price nature of the award provides cost certainty, but the lack of competition limits the ability to assess pricing efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed under the simplified acquisition procedures, indicating a sole-source award. The absence of multiple bidders means there was no opportunity for price discovery through a competitive process. This approach can be justified if only one vendor possesses the unique qualifications or capabilities required, but it necessitates careful justification to ensure fair pricing and avoid potential overspending.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the most cost-effective solution due to the lack of competitive pressure to drive down prices.
Public Impact
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is the primary beneficiary, receiving risk management expertise. Services likely focus on identifying and mitigating risks within HUD's hospital-related operations or investments. The geographic impact is concentrated in Washington D.C., suggesting services are delivered locally. The contract supports administrative functions within HUD, potentially impacting its operational efficiency.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to higher costs than a competed contract.
- Limited transparency into the selection process for a sole-source award.
- Short contract duration might indicate a need for immediate, specific support rather than long-term strategy.
Positive Signals
- Award to a single, potentially specialized vendor can ensure specific expertise is leveraged.
- Fixed-price contract provides cost predictability for the agency.
- Services are targeted towards risk management, a critical function for government agencies.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services sector (NAICS 541611). This is a broad category encompassing a wide range of advisory services. The market for such services is competitive, but specific niche expertise, like hospital risk management, can lead to fewer qualified providers. Benchmarking spending in this area is challenging due to the diverse nature of consulting engagements.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded to a small business, nor does it appear to have a small business set-aside. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. This award does not directly contribute to the small business contracting goals of the agency.
Oversight & Accountability
As a purchase order, oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program officials within HUD. The fixed-price nature provides some cost control. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. There is no specific mention of an Inspector General's involvement for this particular award, though their jurisdiction generally covers HUD programs.
Related Government Programs
- Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Technology Services
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Government Management Consulting
Risk Flags
- Limited Competition
- Lack of Transparency in Award
- Potential for Overpricing
Tags
consulting, risk-management, hospital-services, hud, department-of-housing-and-urban-development, district-of-columbia, sole-source, purchase-order, firm-fixed-price, administrative-management, management-consulting, professional-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $498,693.81 to SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC. RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR HOSPITALS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $498,693.81.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-06-03. End: 2019-12-02.
What specific risks was Summit Consulting LLC engaged to manage for HUD?
The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the 'RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR HOSPITALS.' However, given HUD's mission, these services could encompass financial risks associated with healthcare facility investments or loans, operational risks within HUD-managed healthcare properties, compliance risks related to healthcare regulations, or risks associated with public-private partnerships in the healthcare sector. Further details would require access to the contract statement of work or related documentation.
How does the $498,694 contract value compare to similar risk management contracts for hospitals?
Benchmarking this specific contract value is difficult without more context on the scope of services, duration, and the specific types of risks addressed. Risk management consulting for hospitals can vary significantly in price depending on whether it involves strategic planning, compliance audits, cybersecurity assessments, or operational efficiency reviews. A $498,694 award over six months (June 2019 - December 2019) suggests a substantial engagement, but without comparable sole-source or competed contracts for similar services within HUD or other agencies, a direct value comparison is not feasible from the provided data.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding a sole-source contract for risk management services?
The primary risk of a sole-source award is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competitive pressure. Without multiple bids, the government may overpay for the services rendered. Additionally, there's a risk that the chosen contractor, while potentially possessing unique qualifications, might not be the most innovative or efficient provider available. Transparency can also be a concern, as the justification for the sole-source award needs to be robust to ensure fairness and prevent impropriety.
What is the track record of Summit Consulting LLC in providing risk management services to government agencies?
The provided data indicates that Summit Consulting LLC was awarded this contract. However, it does not offer details on their past performance, client satisfaction, or specific experience in hospital risk management for government entities. A comprehensive assessment of their track record would require searching federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov) for past awards, performance reviews, and any reported issues or successes with their previous government contracts.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The data states the contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically implies a sole-source or limited competition award. The specific justification for why this contract was not competed is not provided. Common reasons for sole-source awards include the existence of only one responsible source, urgent and compelling needs, or specific national security requirements. Without the official justification document, the rationale remains unknown.
How does this spending align with HUD's overall budget for consulting and professional services?
This contract represents a relatively small portion of HUD's overall budget. HUD, like many large federal agencies, procures a significant amount of consulting and professional services annually across various domains. To assess alignment, one would need to compare this $498,694 award against HUD's total spending on similar services during fiscal year 2019 or across multiple years. This single contract, while significant for its specific purpose, is unlikely to represent a major deviation from historical spending patterns for consulting services at HUD.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 601 NEW JERSEY AVE STE 400, WASHINGTON, DC, 20001
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $498,694
Exercised Options: $498,694
Current Obligation: $498,694
Actual Outlays: $373,075
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-06-03
Current End Date: 2019-12-02
Potential End Date: 2019-12-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-08
More Contracts from Summit Consulting LLC
- Risk Management and Capital Assessment Projections (rmcap) — $12.4M (Department of Housing and Urban Development)
- Chips Review and Administration Follow on — $6.3M (U.S. International Development Finance Corporation)
- Economic Model Validation Recompete — $3.4M (General Services Administration)
- Base Services and General Operational Support - Summit Consulting LLC — $2.6M (U.S. International Development Finance Corporation)
- Ebsa - Statistical Support and Data Analysis — $2.6M (Department of Labor)
Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts
- Single Family Master Subservicer Services in Support of Ginnie Mae's Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) Programs — $982.0M (Carrington Mortgage Services LLC)
- TAS::86 4585::TAS Award of Portion of Hits Solicitation Under RFP R-Opc-21970 Pursuant to Settlement Agreement. the Contractor Shall Provide Data Center, Help Desk, and Disaster Recovery Services — $620.3M (Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC)
- TAS::86 4585::TAS Award of Portion of Hits RFP to LMC. the Contractor IS Responsible for Lotus Notes, Desktops, Laptops, Field Office Servers, Lans, Printers, and Kiosks — $498.6M (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- Single Family Master Subservicer Igf::ot::igf — $343.6M (Carrington Mortgage Services LLC)
- Single Family Master Subservicer Igf::ot::igf — $314.2M (Selene Finance LP)
View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →