Summit Consulting LLC awarded $2.6M for administrative management and general operational support by DFC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,632,830 ($2.6M)

Contractor: Summit Consulting LLC

Awarding Agency: U.S. International Development Finance Corporation

Start Date: 2023-04-30

End Date: 2026-04-29

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.4K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: BASE SERVICES AND GENERAL OPERATIONAL SUPPORT - SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20527

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation obligated $2.6 million to SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC for work described as: BASE SERVICES AND GENERAL OPERATIONAL SUPPORT - SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC Key points: 1. Contract provides essential operational support services, ensuring continuity for the agency. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive award, though details are limited. 3. Performance risks appear moderate given the nature of general support services. 4. The contract duration of three years allows for stable service provision. 5. This award falls within the professional services sector, a common area for federal contracting. 6. Focus on administrative management indicates a need for efficient internal operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.63 million over three years for administrative management and general operational support appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar service contracts. While specific performance metrics are not detailed here, the pricing structure based on labor hours allows for flexibility. Without direct comparisons to identical service scopes and contractor performance histories, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the award seems aligned with market rates for management consulting services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a full and open competition process for awards below certain thresholds. While the number of bidders is not specified, the use of SAP suggests that multiple offers were likely solicited and considered. This competitive approach is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process, even under SAP, helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) benefits from enhanced administrative and operational efficiency. Services delivered include general management consulting and administrative support, crucial for agency functioning. The geographic impact is primarily within Washington D.C., where the agency is headquartered. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled professionals to support DFC's mission.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical operational support could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
Contract duration provides stability for essential services.
Contractor has a clear designation for administrative management services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of agency functions. Comparable spending benchmarks for management consulting services vary widely based on scope and duration, but this award appears to be a moderate-sized contract for ongoing operational support.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false). There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Summit Consulting LLC voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms and performance expectations. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management Services
General Management Consulting Services
Operational Support Contracts
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues
Risk of cost overruns if scope is not managed
Limited visibility into specific performance metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation awarded $2.6 million to SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC. BASE SERVICES AND GENERAL OPERATIONAL SUPPORT - SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUMMIT CONSULTING LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (U.S. International Development Finance Corporation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-04-30. End: 2026-04-29.

What is Summit Consulting LLC's track record with federal contracts, particularly in administrative management?

Summit Consulting LLC has been awarded federal contracts primarily in the administrative management and general management consulting services categories. While specific details on past performance quality are not provided in this summary, the award by the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation suggests a level of confidence in their capabilities. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their track record. However, being awarded contracts indicates they have met basic eligibility and capability requirements for federal work.

How does the $2.63 million contract value compare to similar administrative support contracts at the DFC or other agencies?

The $2.63 million contract value for three years of administrative management and general operational support is a moderate award. Benchmarking requires comparing it to contracts with identical scopes of work, service levels, and durations across similar agencies. Generally, federal agencies contract for these types of services frequently. The value appears reasonable for supporting agency operations, especially considering it's for a specific duration and likely covers a defined set of tasks. Without access to a detailed database of comparable contracts with granular data, a precise comparison is difficult, but it does not appear to be an outlier in terms of cost for such services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance deficiencies by Summit Consulting LLC, leading to disruptions in DFC's administrative operations. Another risk is the potential for cost overruns if the labor hour model is not managed effectively or if the scope of work expands beyond initial estimates. Mitigation strategies typically involve clear performance work statements, regular progress reviews, defined key performance indicators (KPIs), and robust oversight by the contracting officer's representative (COR). The three-year duration also allows for a stable, predictable service environment, reducing risks associated with frequent contractor transitions.

How effective is the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation in ensuring value for taxpayers?

The 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures) designation indicates that the contract was awarded through a competitive process, which is generally beneficial for taxpayers. SAP is designed for acquisitions below certain dollar thresholds (e.g., $250,000, though this can vary), streamlining the procurement process while still encouraging competition. This means multiple vendors were likely solicited, allowing the agency to compare offers and select the best value. While SAP is less formal than full-scale competitive bidding, it still provides a mechanism for price discovery and ensures that the government is not simply awarding contracts without exploring market options, thus promoting efficient use of taxpayer funds.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services at the DFC?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services at the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) would require access to historical contract data beyond this single award. This contract, valued at $2.63 million over three years, represents a portion of the agency's spending in this category. To understand the pattern, one would need to examine previous years' spending on similar services, identify the primary contractors, and observe trends in contract values and durations. This would help determine if this award is consistent with past practices or represents a significant shift in DFC's procurement strategy for operational support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 601 NEW JERSEY AVE STE 400, WASHINGTON, DC, 20001

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,632,830

Exercised Options: $2,632,830

Current Obligation: $2,632,830

Actual Outlays: $2,031,677

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 77344421A0013

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline