DHS awards $58.3M for detention center security, with Akima Global Services securing the contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $58,304,463 ($58.3M)

Contractor: Akima Global Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2019-04-30

End Date: 2020-04-30

Contract Duration: 366 days

Daily Burn Rate: $159.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF KROME DETENTION CENTER

Place of Performance

Location: HERNDON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20171

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $58.3 million to AKIMA GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF KROME DETENTION CENTER Key points: 1. Contract value of $58.3M over one year indicates significant investment in facility security. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor, Akima Global Services. 4. The contract's duration of 366 days allows for sustained security operations. 5. Security guards and patrol services are critical for maintaining order and safety within detention facilities. 6. Geographic focus on Virginia for this specific contract highlights regional operational needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $58.3 million for a one-year period for security guard services appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for detention center security would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if managed effectively. The absence of raw dollar amounts in the provided data prevents direct comparison, but the scale suggests a significant operational requirement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on prior performance or other criteria. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies multiple interested parties participated. This level of competition is typically favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.

Taxpayer Impact: A broad competition, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices and encouraging a wider range of qualified vendors to submit proposals, potentially leading to better service at a lower cost.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), receiving essential security services. The contract delivers security guard and patrol services to ensure the safety and security of a detention facility. The geographic impact is focused on Virginia, addressing specific operational needs within that state. Workforce implications include the creation of jobs for security personnel employed by Akima Global Services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for over-reliance on a single contractor for critical security functions.
Need for robust performance monitoring to ensure service quality meets contract requirements.
Risk of price creep in future contract renewals if competition diminishes.

Positive Signals

Akima Global Services has a track record with government contracts, suggesting familiarity with federal requirements.
The fixed-price contract structure incentivizes cost control and efficient service delivery by the contractor.
Full and open competition aims to ensure a competitive market and potentially better value.

Sector Analysis

The security services sector is a significant component of the federal contracting landscape, particularly for agencies like DHS. This contract falls within the broader category of professional services, specifically focusing on security and protective services. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous established providers. Federal spending in this area is driven by the need to secure government facilities, personnel, and assets, with detention center security being a critical sub-segment.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific contract. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the most capable and competitive offer through full and open competition. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which would typically be detailed in the contract's performance work statement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the purview of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) contracting officers and program managers within DHS. Performance monitoring, quality assurance checks, and invoice reviews are standard accountability measures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. The Inspector General for DHS would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

DHS Detention Facility Operations
Federal Security Guard Contracts
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Services
Government Facility Management
Public Safety Contracts

Risk Flags

Performance Risk
Personnel Reliability Risk
Contract Compliance Risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $58.3 million to AKIMA GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC. IGF::CT::IGF KROME DETENTION CENTER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AKIMA GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $58.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-04-30. End: 2020-04-30.

What is Akima Global Services' past performance record with DHS and similar agencies?

Akima Global Services has a history of performing various contracts with federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security. Their portfolio often includes services related to logistics, base operations support, and aviation. For security services specifically, their track record would need to be reviewed against the performance requirements of this detention center contract. A detailed review of past performance evaluations, any past disputes, or contract terminations would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability in delivering security guard and patrol services. Without specific past performance data for this exact service type, it's difficult to definitively assess their suitability beyond their general government contracting experience.

How does the per-unit cost of security personnel compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities?

Determining the precise per-unit cost requires breaking down the total contract value ($58.3M) by the number of personnel and the duration of their service. Since the number of guards and their hours are not provided, a direct per-unit cost calculation is not feasible. However, the overall contract value for a one-year period suggests a significant operational cost. Industry benchmarks for security guard services vary widely based on location, level of security required (e.g., armed vs. unarmed, specialized training), and the specific duties performed. For a detention facility, which demands a higher level of security and potentially more specialized personnel, costs are expected to be above general commercial security rates. A thorough analysis would involve comparing the implied hourly rate or daily rate per guard against established market rates for similar government or high-security private sector contracts in the Virginia region.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this security contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a contract of this nature typically focus on ensuring the safety, security, and order within the detention facility. Common KPIs would likely include metrics related to response times to incidents, adherence to post orders, incident reporting accuracy and timeliness, personnel punctuality and attendance, and the absence of security breaches or escapes. The contract's performance work statement (PWS) would detail these specific KPIs and the acceptable performance thresholds. Regular performance reviews and site inspections by ICE officials would assess Akima Global Services' compliance with these KPIs. Failure to meet critical KPIs could result in penalties or corrective action.

What is the historical spending trend for security services at this specific DHS facility or similar ICE facilities?

To assess historical spending trends, one would need to examine contract awards data for security services at this particular IGF KROME DETENTION CENTER or comparable ICE facilities over several fiscal years. This would involve looking at prior contracts awarded to Akima Global Services or other vendors for similar services. Analyzing this data would reveal whether the current $58.3 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending compared to previous years. Understanding these trends can help identify potential cost efficiencies, inflationary pressures, or changes in operational requirements that might influence spending patterns over time.

Are there any identified risks associated with Akima Global Services' performance on this contract?

Risks associated with this contract would primarily revolve around the contractor's ability to consistently deliver high-quality security services as stipulated. Potential risks include personnel issues such as high turnover, inadequate training, or misconduct, which could compromise security. There's also the risk of performance deficiencies, such as slow response times or failure to follow protocols, leading to security incidents. Contract management risks include potential cost overruns if the fixed-price model is poorly managed by the contractor, or disputes over contract scope or deliverables. The 'Exclusion of Sources' in the competition type might also hint at prior performance issues with certain entities, though not necessarily with Akima Global Services themselves.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Nana Regional Corporation Inc (UEI: 079253761)

Address: 3901 OLD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RD STE 200-G, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99502

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $58,304,463

Exercised Options: $58,304,463

Current Obligation: $58,304,463

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HSCEDM14D00002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline