DOT awards $235K for Yellowstone Trail road engineering services to Rocksol Consulting Group

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $235,354 ($235.4K)

Contractor: Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2025-07-01

End Date: 2025-12-15

Contract Duration: 167 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MT FLAP PARK 2021(1), OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL SOUTH IMPROVEMENT & PRESERVATION - CONSULTANT PROJECT ENGINEER SERVICES FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION LOCATED IN PARK COUNTY.

Place of Performance

Location: GARDINER, PARK County, MONTANA, 59030

State: Montana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $235,354.14 to ROCKSOL CONSULTING GROUP, INC. for work described as: MT FLAP PARK 2021(1), OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL SOUTH IMPROVEMENT & PRESERVATION - CONSULTANT PROJECT ENGINEER SERVICES FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION LOCATED IN PARK COUNTY. Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a delivery order under a larger agreement, indicating ongoing program needs. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps control costs and shifts some risk to the contractor. 4. The project is located in Park County, Montana, with a defined performance period. 5. Engineering services are crucial for infrastructure projects, ensuring quality and safety. 6. The award amount is relatively small, suggesting a focused scope of work.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $235,354.14 for engineering services appears reasonable for a project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar consultant engineering contracts for road construction in the region would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control. Without specific details on the scope of services, a direct comparison to market rates for per-unit costs is difficult, but the overall award seems within expected parameters for specialized engineering support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The Federal Highway Administration's use of this procurement method suggests a commitment to obtaining the best value through a broad market solicitation.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically leads to lower prices and a wider selection of qualified contractors, ensuring efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the residents and users of roads in Park County, Montana, who will experience improved infrastructure. The services delivered include crucial project engineering for road construction, ensuring adherence to standards and specifications. The geographic impact is localized to Park County, Montana, supporting regional infrastructure development. The contract supports the workforce within the engineering services sector, specifically benefiting Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The engineering services sector is a critical component of the construction and infrastructure industry. This contract falls under the 'Engineering Services' NAICS code (541330). The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. Federal spending in this area supports the maintenance and development of national infrastructure, with contracts often awarded through competitive bidding processes to ensure value for taxpayer money. The size of this award is modest, suggesting a specific, focused engineering task rather than a large-scale project management role.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside requirement for this particular award (ss: false, sb: false). While Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc. may be a small business itself, the procurement method of full and open competition does not mandate subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the prime contractor has a history of subcontracting with small businesses on other projects.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) contracting officers and project managers. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for cost control. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, engineering-services, department-of-transportation, federal-highway-administration, montana, park-county, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, infrastructure, road-construction

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $235,354.14 to ROCKSOL CONSULTING GROUP, INC.. MT FLAP PARK 2021(1), OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL SOUTH IMPROVEMENT & PRESERVATION - CONSULTANT PROJECT ENGINEER SERVICES FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION LOCATED IN PARK COUNTY.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROCKSOL CONSULTING GROUP, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $235,354.14.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-07-01. End: 2025-12-15.

What is Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Transportation?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to fully assess Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc.'s track record. Information such as past performance ratings, previous contract values, and any history of disputes or contract terminations would provide insight into their reliability and experience. Specifically examining their history with the Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration would highlight their familiarity with the agency's requirements and processes. Without this specific data, it is difficult to definitively assess their past performance, though the award of this contract suggests they met the agency's initial qualifications.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar engineering services contracts for road construction in Montana?

To benchmark the $235,354.14 award, one would need to analyze recent federal, state, and local contracts for similar engineering services in Montana. Key comparison points would include the scope of work (e.g., design, oversight, materials testing), project complexity, and the specific type of road construction involved. For instance, if this contract covers detailed project engineering for a significant road segment, the price might be competitive. If it's for a smaller, less complex task, it might be on the higher side. Access to a database of comparable contract awards, including their values and scopes, is essential for a thorough comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks for this contract include potential scope creep, where the project's requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns or delays. Another risk is contractor performance; if Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc. fails to deliver quality engineering services, it could impact the road construction project's timeline and safety. Mitigation strategies include the firm fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently. Clear definition of the scope of work in the contract documents, regular progress monitoring by the FHWA, and adherence to established engineering standards are also crucial mitigation measures.

How effective is the Federal Highway Administration in managing engineering services contracts to ensure program effectiveness?

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) generally has robust processes for managing engineering services contracts, aimed at ensuring program effectiveness. Their effectiveness is often gauged by the successful completion of infrastructure projects on time and within budget, and the long-term performance of the constructed roads. The FHWA utilizes experienced contracting officers, project engineers, and oversight mechanisms, including site visits and reviews, to monitor contractor performance and adherence to specifications. While specific effectiveness metrics for this individual contract are not available, the FHWA's overall mission success in facilitating state and local transportation projects suggests a generally effective approach to contract management.

What are the historical spending patterns for engineering services by the Department of Transportation in Montana?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for engineering services by the Department of Transportation (DOT) in Montana would involve examining contract data over several fiscal years. This would reveal the total amount spent on such services, the types of engineering tasks procured (e.g., design, environmental, construction management), and the primary contractors awarded these funds. It would also show trends in contract values and the frequency of full and open competition versus other procurement methods. Such analysis helps in understanding the agency's reliance on external engineering expertise and provides context for the current award amount relative to past investments in Montana's infrastructure.

What is the typical duration and value of similar engineering consultant contracts awarded by the FHWA?

The typical duration and value of similar engineering consultant contracts awarded by the FHWA can vary significantly based on the project's scope and complexity. Contracts for project engineer services, like the one awarded to Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc., often range from a few months to over a year, with values from tens of thousands to several hundred thousand dollars. Larger, more comprehensive engineering contracts, such as those for highway design or environmental impact studies, can extend for multiple years and involve millions of dollars. The $235,354.14 award for a 167-day duration appears to be within the common range for specialized engineering support on a specific segment of a larger project.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICESARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12076 GRANT STREET, THORNTON, CO, 80241

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Other Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $235,354

Exercised Options: $235,354

Current Obligation: $235,354

Actual Outlays: $235,354

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 69056721D000002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-07-01

Current End Date: 2025-12-15

Potential End Date: 2025-12-15 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-06

More Contracts from Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc.

View all Rocksol Consulting Group, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Transportation Contracts

View all Department of Transportation contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending