EPA Spends $54M on NAS Transportation Research Board Core Support via Non-Competitive Delivery Order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $54,082 ($54.1K)

Contractor: National Academy of Sciences

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2024-11-21

End Date: 2025-07-31

Contract Duration: 252 days

Daily Burn Rate: $215/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NAS TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD CORE SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20001

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $54,082.38 to NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES for work described as: NAS TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD CORE SUPPORT Key points: 1. The contract is for core support services for the Transportation Research Board. 2. The National Academy of Sciences is the sole provider, raising competition concerns. 3. The fixed-price contract structure aims to control costs, but lack of competition may limit price discovery. 4. This spending falls under 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services'.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order. Without a competitive benchmark, assessing value for money is difficult. The total award is $54.08M.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to the National Academy of Sciences. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs than a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the lack of competition for these essential research support services.

Public Impact

Essential research support for transportation policy and innovation will continue. Lack of competition could mean less efficient use of taxpayer funds. Transparency in the justification for sole-source procurement is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services'. Spending in this category can vary widely, but a $54M sole-source award warrants scrutiny for its necessity and pricing.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this sole-source contract, which is typical for large, specialized support services.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award necessitates robust oversight to ensure the National Academy of Sciences is providing services efficiently and at a fair price, despite the lack of competition.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-scientific-and-technical-consultin, environmental-protection-agency, dc, delivery-order, under-100k

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $54,082.38 to NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. NAS TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD CORE SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $54,082.38.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-11-21. End: 2025-07-31.

What is the justification for awarding this contract sole-source to the National Academy of Sciences?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, specialized knowledge, or a critical need that only a specific entity can fulfill. For the National Academy of Sciences, this often relates to their established expertise and role in providing independent, objective advice to the government on science and technology matters, including transportation.

How can the EPA ensure fair pricing without a competitive bidding process?

The EPA can ensure fair pricing by conducting thorough cost analyses, benchmarking against similar services (if available), reviewing the contractor's cost proposals in detail, and negotiating profit margins. Regular performance reviews and audits can also help identify inefficiencies and ensure value for money is being achieved.

What is the long-term impact of relying on sole-source contracts for core support services?

Long-term reliance on sole-source contracts can stifle innovation and competition within a sector, potentially leading to complacency and higher costs over time. It also reduces opportunities for new or smaller entities to enter the market and offer alternative solutions, potentially limiting the government's access to the best available services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesOther Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTGeneral Science and Technology R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2101 CONSTITUTION AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20418

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $400,137

Exercised Options: $54,082

Current Obligation: $54,082

Actual Outlays: $54,082

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERC24D0007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-11-21

Current End Date: 2025-07-31

Potential End Date: 2029-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-07

More Contracts from National Academy of Sciences

View all National Academy of Sciences federal contracts →

Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts

View all Environmental Protection Agency contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending