NOAA Spends $15.6M on Research Support Services via Sole-Source Contract with National Academy of Sciences

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,629,497 ($15.6M)

Contractor: National Academy of Sciences

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2005-08-04

End Date: 2011-08-31

Contract Duration: 2,218 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WOODS HOLE, BARNSTABLE County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02543

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $15.6 million to NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES for work described as: RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $15.6 million over six years. 2. Sole-source award to National Academy of Sciences raises competition concerns. 3. Contract covers 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services,' a broad category. 4. Long duration of 2218 days suggests a potentially ongoing need.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract is a 'COST NO FEE' type, indicating that the government pays the actual costs incurred by the contractor without any additional fee. This pricing structure can be difficult to benchmark against similar contracts, especially without detailed cost breakdowns. The absence of a fee makes direct comparison challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This method limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no competitive pressure to drive down prices. The justification for a sole-source award is not provided in the data.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award may result in the government paying more than it would have under a competitive bidding process, impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers funded a significant $15.6 million for research support services. The National Academy of Sciences, a non-governmental organization, received this substantial contract. The long contract duration suggests a sustained reliance on the contractor's expertise. Lack of competition raises questions about the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' sector is broad and can encompass a wide range of expertise. Benchmarking spending in this area is difficult without specific details on the services provided. However, $15.6 million over six years for research support is a substantial investment.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific contract award.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this contract warrants scrutiny regarding the justification for not competing the award. Oversight should ensure that the services provided were necessary and that the costs incurred were reasonable, even without a fee.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-scientific-and-technical-consultin, department-of-commerce, ma, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $15.6 million to NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-08-04. End: 2011-08-31.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive approaches considered?

The provided data does not include the justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are justified when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. Without this information, it's impossible to assess if competitive alternatives were adequately explored or if the sole-source decision was appropriate and in the government's best interest.

How were the costs for this 'COST NO FEE' contract determined and validated to ensure they represent fair value?

For 'COST NO FEE' contracts, the government reimburses the contractor's actual, allowable, and reasonable costs. Validation typically involves rigorous auditing and review of the contractor's financial records and cost accounting practices. The absence of a fee means the government bears the full cost risk, making detailed cost monitoring and negotiation crucial for ensuring value.

What specific research support services were rendered under this contract, and how did they contribute to NOAA's mission objectives?

The data categorizes the service as 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' (NAICS 541690), which is very broad. To assess effectiveness, specific deliverables, project outcomes, and their alignment with NOAA's scientific and environmental research goals would need to be examined. Understanding the precise nature of the support is key to evaluating its impact.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesOther Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 500 FIFTH STREET NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 98

Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,679,134

Exercised Options: $28,579,139

Current Obligation: $15,629,497

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-08-04

Current End Date: 2011-08-31

Potential End Date: 2011-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-03-02

More Contracts from National Academy of Sciences

View all National Academy of Sciences federal contracts →

Other Department of Commerce Contracts

View all Department of Commerce contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending