EPA awards $1.96M for facility support services to APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,962,870 ($2.0M)

Contractor: Aptim Federal Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2024-06-01

End Date: 2027-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,094 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: CONTRACT #: 68HERC24D0003, NEW TO # 68HERC24F0341: FACILITY SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE EPA TEST &EVALUATION FACILITY, FULL CONTAINMENT FACILITY, EXPERIMENTAL STREAM FACILITY, & CENTER HILL FACILITY

Place of Performance

Location: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON County, OHIO, 45204

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $2.0 million to APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: CONTRACT #: 68HERC24D0003, NEW TO # 68HERC24F0341: FACILITY SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE EPA TEST &EVALUATION FACILITY, FULL CONTAINMENT FACILITY, EXPERIMENTAL STREAM FACILITY, & CENTER HILL FACILITY Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for facility support services, indicating a need for operational maintenance and upkeep. 3. APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC is the contractor, with a delivery order under a larger contract. 4. The contract duration is approximately three years, from June 2024 to May 2027. 5. The primary service area is Ohio, specifically supporting EPA test and evaluation facilities. 6. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $1.96 million for three years of facility support services appears reasonable for the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar contracts for EPA facility maintenance and operational support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the initial pricing was deemed acceptable and that cost overruns are the contractor's responsibility.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified bidders were likely solicited. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters price discovery and allows the government to select the most advantageous offer. The competitive nature suggests that the pricing is likely aligned with market rates.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure services at the best possible price, reducing the risk of overpayment for essential facility support.

Public Impact

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benefits from reliable facility support, ensuring the operational integrity of its research and testing infrastructure. Services include maintenance and support for critical facilities like the Full Containment Facility and Experimental Stream Facility. The geographic impact is concentrated in Ohio, supporting EPA operations within the state. Workforce implications may include on-site personnel provided by APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC to manage and maintain the facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if facility needs evolve beyond initial estimates.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical operational continuity.
Ensuring consistent quality of services across different EPA facilities.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract limits cost uncertainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Contract duration provides stability for facility operations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically supporting government research and development facilities. The market for facility support services is competitive, with numerous providers capable of meeting the operational needs of federal agencies. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining the infrastructure that enables scientific research and environmental testing.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any small business set-aside provisions for this contract. Therefore, the primary contractor, APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC, is likely a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans to small businesses, which would be a key area to monitor for small business ecosystem impact.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Environmental Protection Agency's contracting officers and program managers responsible for the supported facilities. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, with performance expectations tied to payment. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance metrics may not be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

EPA Facility Operations and Maintenance Contracts
Federal Research and Development Support Services
Environmental Science and Technology Services

Risk Flags

Contractor performance history
Adequacy of competition
Potential for scope creep
Ensuring service quality and compliance

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $2.0 million to APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC. CONTRACT #: 68HERC24D0003, NEW TO # 68HERC24F0341: FACILITY SUPPORT SERVICES TO THE EPA TEST &EVALUATION FACILITY, FULL CONTAINMENT FACILITY, EXPERIMENTAL STREAM FACILITY, & CENTER HILL FACILITY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-06-01. End: 2027-05-31.

What is APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC's track record with the EPA and similar government contracts?

APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC has a history of performing various services for federal agencies, including facility support, environmental services, and engineering. Their past performance with the EPA and other departments like the Department of Defense and Department of Energy would be a key indicator of their capability to fulfill this contract. A review of their contract history, including any past performance evaluations or awards, would provide insight into their reliability and expertise in managing complex facility operations and ensuring compliance with environmental and safety standards. Specific details on their prior work with EPA test and evaluation facilities would be particularly relevant.

How does the $1.96 million contract value compare to similar EPA facility support contracts?

The $1.96 million contract value for three years of facility support services for EPA test and evaluation facilities in Ohio needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. Factors such as the size and complexity of the facilities, the specific services required (e.g., HVAC, janitorial, security, specialized lab support), and the geographic location influence pricing. Without direct comparisons to contracts for similar EPA facilities or other federal research installations, it's challenging to definitively assess value. However, for a multi-year contract supporting specialized scientific infrastructure, this amount suggests a moderate investment, and further analysis would require access to a broader dataset of federal facility support contracts.

What are the primary risks associated with this facility support contract?

Key risks include potential disruptions to critical EPA research and testing operations if the contractor fails to perform adequately. There's also a risk of cost overruns if the firm fixed-price contract doesn't fully account for unforeseen maintenance needs or regulatory changes, although this risk is primarily borne by the contractor. Ensuring consistent service quality across different facilities and maintaining compliance with stringent environmental and safety regulations are also significant considerations. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for essential support functions introduces operational risk.

How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in managing costs for this type of service?

The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in controlling costs for services where the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. For facility support services, FFP shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage expenses efficiently. This benefits the government by providing cost certainty. However, if unforeseen issues arise that require significant deviation from the original scope, the government might face challenges in addressing them without potentially renegotiating the contract or issuing new ones, which could lead to delays or increased costs if not managed carefully.

What is the historical spending trend for facility support services at EPA test and evaluation facilities?

Historical spending data for facility support services at EPA test and evaluation facilities would provide context for the current $1.96 million award. Analyzing past expenditures over several fiscal years would reveal trends in contract values, the number of contracts awarded, and the types of services procured. This analysis could indicate whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether it aligns with the agency's operational needs and budget allocations. Understanding these patterns helps in assessing the current contract's value and the overall investment in maintaining these critical research assets.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Veritas Capital Fund Management, L.L.C.

Address: 1200 BRICKYARD LN STE 202, BATON ROUGE, LA, 70802

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,012,886

Exercised Options: $2,012,886

Current Obligation: $1,962,870

Actual Outlays: $1,046,980

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERC24D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline