EPA Awards $11.7M Remedial Action Contract to J.F. Brennan for Torch Lake Cleanup
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,730,030 ($11.7M)
Contractor: J. F. Brennan Company, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2026-04-02
End Date: 2027-02-26
Contract Duration: 330 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TORCH LAKE-LAKE LINDEN REMEDIAL ACTION (RA) UNDER GLNPO-RRS II MATOC - TASK ORDER AWARD
Place of Performance
Location: LAKE LINDEN, HOUGHTON County, MICHIGAN, 49945
State: Michigan Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $11.7 million to J. F. BRENNAN COMPANY, INC. for work described as: TORCH LAKE-LAKE LINDEN REMEDIAL ACTION (RA) UNDER GLNPO-RRS II MATOC - TASK ORDER AWARD Key points: 1. Contract awarded for environmental remediation services at Torch Lake. 2. J.F. Brennan Company, Inc. secured the contract. 3. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price type. 4. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $11.7M for a 330-day duration appears reasonable for complex environmental remediation. Benchmarking against similar EPA Superfund site cleanups would provide further context.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and value for taxpayer funds.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process suggests efforts to secure fair pricing for the environmental cleanup services, benefiting taxpayers.
Public Impact
Environmental cleanup of a contaminated site. Restoration of natural resources in Michigan. Potential impact on local communities and ecosystems. Long-term environmental health improvements.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in complex remediation projects.
- Environmental risks associated with cleanup activities.
Positive Signals
- Clear contract scope for remedial action.
- Competitive award process.
- Defined period of performance.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the environmental remediation sector, specifically addressing contamination at a Superfund site. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on site complexity and cleanup scope.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. Analysis of the prime contractor's size and subcontracting plans would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this remedial action. The contract's performance will be subject to EPA's standard oversight and accountability mechanisms.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep in complex environmental projects.
- Unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
- Effectiveness of chosen remediation technologies.
- Long-term environmental monitoring requirements.
Tags
remediation-services, environmental-protection-agency, mi, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $11.7 million to J. F. BRENNAN COMPANY, INC.. TORCH LAKE-LAKE LINDEN REMEDIAL ACTION (RA) UNDER GLNPO-RRS II MATOC - TASK ORDER AWARD
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is J. F. BRENNAN COMPANY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2027-02-26.
What specific remediation technologies will be employed, and how do they compare in cost-effectiveness for this site?
The specific remediation technologies are not detailed in the provided data. A thorough analysis would require reviewing the technical proposal and scope of work to identify the chosen methods. Comparing their historical cost-effectiveness on similar sites, considering factors like efficiency, long-term efficacy, and disposal costs, is crucial for assessing value.
What are the primary environmental risks associated with this specific remedial action, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Primary risks could include potential for contaminant spread during excavation or treatment, worker exposure, and unforeseen site conditions. Mitigation strategies typically involve stringent containment protocols, personal protective equipment (PPE) for workers, real-time environmental monitoring, and emergency response plans. The effectiveness of these strategies depends on rigorous implementation and oversight.
How does the awarded price compare to the estimated cost or budget for this remedial action, and what does this suggest about the effectiveness of the competition?
Without the estimated cost or budget, a direct comparison is impossible. However, a competitive award process, especially 'full and open competition,' generally suggests the awarded price reflects market rates and the effectiveness of the bidding process in achieving value. A significant difference between the awarded price and industry benchmarks for similar work would warrant further investigation.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 68HE0525R0025
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 818 BAINBRIDGE ST, LA CROSSE, WI, 54603
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,991,030
Exercised Options: $11,730,030
Current Obligation: $11,730,030
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 68HE0525D0010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-02
Current End Date: 2027-02-26
Potential End Date: 2027-02-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-02
More Contracts from J. F. Brennan Company, Inc.
- LD22 Fish Passage Improvement Project — $67.5M (Department of Defense)
- CHL Chamber Floor and Wall Repairs Located in Chicago, IL - $19,603,980.00 — $42.7M (Department of Defense)
- Spirit Lake Phase III Task Order Under Glnpo-Rrs Matoc — $35.4M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Munger Landing RA Task Order Under Glnpo-Rrs Matoc — $31.8M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Thomson Reservoir Remedial Action — $29.3M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)