EPA awards $357K remediation contract to Heliotech for Roto-Finish ESO site in Michigan

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $357,424 ($357.4K)

Contractor: Heliotech

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2024-01-24

End Date: 2028-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,650 days

Daily Burn Rate: $217/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THIS TASK ORDER IS FOR THE ROTO-FINISH ESO SITE

Place of Performance

Location: PORTAGE, KALAMAZOO County, MICHIGAN, 49024

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $357,424 to HELIOTECH for work described as: THIS TASK ORDER IS FOR THE ROTO-FINISH ESO SITE Key points: 1. Contract value represents a modest investment in environmental remediation services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 4. Contract duration of over four years indicates a long-term remediation need. 5. The contract falls under Remediation Services, a critical environmental sector. 6. Performance is located in Michigan, potentially impacting local environmental quality.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $357,424 is relatively small for a remediation project of this duration. Without specific benchmarks for the Roto-Finish ESO site's contamination levels and required work, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability. Comparing this to similar-sized remediation efforts would be necessary for a more robust value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while initially there might have been some limitations, the final award was made through a broad competitive process. The number of bids received (3) suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific task order. This level of competition is generally positive for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with a limited number of bidders, helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down prices compared to a sole-source award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the local environment and community surrounding the Roto-Finish ESO site, through the cleanup of potential contaminants. The service delivered is environmental remediation, addressing specific site contamination issues. The geographic impact is localized to the Roto-Finish ESO site in Michigan. Workforce implications may include employment for environmental technicians and specialists during the contract period.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition (3 bidders) may not have yielded the lowest possible price.
The specific nature of the contamination and remediation required is not detailed, posing potential scope creep risks.
Long contract duration could be subject to changing environmental regulations or unforeseen site conditions.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Full and open competition, even with few bidders, is preferable to sole-source.
The contract addresses a specific environmental remediation need, contributing to public health and safety.

Sector Analysis

The environmental remediation sector is a significant part of the broader environmental services industry, driven by regulatory compliance and historical contamination cleanup needs. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on the scale and complexity of sites. This contract, valued at $357,424, represents a small portion of overall federal environmental spending, likely focused on a specific, contained remediation task.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Heliotech is a small business itself and utilizes other small businesses for subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the awarding agency. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides some level of financial oversight. Transparency would depend on the EPA's public reporting practices for contract awards and performance. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program
RCRA Corrective Actions
Brownfields Program
Environmental Consulting Services
Hazardous Waste Management

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen site conditions
Risk of scope creep due to undefined contamination complexities
Limited competition may not ensure optimal pricing
Long contract duration increases exposure to regulatory changes

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $357,424 to HELIOTECH. THIS TASK ORDER IS FOR THE ROTO-FINISH ESO SITE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HELIOTECH.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $357,424.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-01-24. End: 2028-07-31.

What is Heliotech's track record with the EPA or similar agencies for environmental remediation projects?

Information regarding Heliotech's specific track record with the EPA or other federal agencies for environmental remediation projects is not provided in the given data. A thorough analysis would require accessing contract databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) to review past performance, contract history, and any reported issues or successes. Understanding their experience with similar site types and contamination levels would be crucial for assessing their capability and the potential risks associated with this award. Without this historical data, it's difficult to gauge their reliability and efficiency in executing this remediation task.

How does the per-unit cost or overall value compare to similar remediation contracts awarded by the EPA?

The provided data does not include sufficient detail to perform a robust per-unit cost comparison. Key metrics such as the volume of contaminated material, types of contaminants, complexity of the site, and specific remediation technologies employed are missing. The total contract value of $357,424 over approximately 4.5 years is relatively modest. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable EPA remediation contracts for sites with similar characteristics (e.g., industrial sites, specific contaminant types, geographic region) and analyze their total values, durations, and scope of work. This would help determine if the pricing for the Roto-Finish ESO site is competitive or potentially inflated.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific remediation contract?

Key risks include the potential for unforeseen site conditions or contamination complexities that could lead to scope creep and cost overruns, despite the firm fixed-price structure. The long duration (over four years) increases exposure to changing regulatory requirements or technological advancements in remediation. Furthermore, with only three bidders, there's a risk that the competition may not have been robust enough to secure the most cost-effective solution. Contractor performance is also a risk; if Heliotech lacks sufficient experience or resources, delays and suboptimal remediation outcomes could occur. Finally, the specific nature of the 'Roto-Finish ESO site' implies a potentially industrial past, which often involves challenging contaminants requiring specialized handling.

What is the historical spending pattern for environmental remediation at the Roto-Finish ESO site or similar EPA-managed sites?

The provided data does not contain historical spending information for the Roto-Finish ESO site or specific historical spending patterns for similar EPA-managed sites. To assess this, one would need to research historical EPA contracts and expenditures related to this particular site, if any, and analyze trends in remediation spending across comparable federal sites. Understanding past investments can provide context for the current contract's value and scope, and identify any patterns of recurring issues or escalating costs. Without this historical perspective, it's challenging to evaluate if this $357,424 award is consistent with previous efforts or represents a new phase of work.

What specific environmental regulations or compliance issues does this contract aim to address?

The data indicates the contract is for 'Remediation Services' at the 'Roto-Finish ESO site' for the 'Environmental Protection Agency.' While specific regulations are not named, remediation contracts typically address violations or potential threats under major environmental laws such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund), or state-level environmental protection statutes. The 'ESO' designation might imply an 'Environmental Services Order' or similar, often related to cleanup of industrial waste or hazardous substances. The contract's objective is likely to bring the site into compliance with applicable environmental standards, mitigate risks to human health and the environment, and potentially prepare the site for future use.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 68HE0524R0001

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3201 C ST, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $487,342

Exercised Options: $487,342

Current Obligation: $357,424

Actual Outlays: $132,665

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $67,395

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0118D0014

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline