EPA Awards $6M for Superfund Site Remedial Designs to AECOM Technical Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $6,057,464 ($6.1M)
Contractor: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2022-10-03
End Date: 2028-04-02
Contract Duration: 2,008 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) IS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE EPA FOR PREPARATION OF REMEDIAL DESIGNS (RDS) FOR TWO COMPONENTS OF THE SELECTED REMEDY FOR THE BAGHURST DRIVE SUPERFUND SITE (SITE): IN SITU THERMAL REMEDIATION (ISTR) AND IN SITU CHE
Place of Performance
Location: LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90071
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $6.1 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) IS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE EPA FOR PREPARATION OF REMEDIAL DESIGNS (RDS) FOR TWO COMPONENTS OF THE SELECTED REMEDY FOR THE BAGHURST DRIVE SUPERFUND SITE (SITE): IN SITU THERMAL REMEDIATION (ISTR) AND IN SITU CHE Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Remedial Designs (RDs) for ISTR and ISCR at Baghurst Drive Superfund Site. 2. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. secured the task order. 3. The contract falls under Remediation Services (NAICS 562910). 4. Competition was full and open, indicating potential for competitive pricing. 5. The project duration is approximately 5 years, ending April 2028.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $6.06 million for a 5-year duration appears reasonable for complex environmental remediation design services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale Superfund site remediation design contracts would provide further validation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential environmental cleanup services.
Public Impact
Addresses critical environmental cleanup at a Superfund site, protecting public health and local ecosystems. Long-term project (5 years) signifies a significant commitment to site remediation. Focus on innovative technologies like In Situ Thermal Remediation (ISTR) and In Situ Chemical Reduction (ISCR). Potential for job creation in environmental engineering and remediation services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in complex remediation projects.
- Delays in remediation timelines can increase overall project costs.
- Effectiveness of chosen remediation technologies needs ongoing monitoring.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Experienced contractor (AECOM Technical Services, Inc.).
- Clear definition of services for Remedial Designs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation Services sector. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory requirements and the need to address legacy contamination. Benchmarks for similar large-scale Superfund site remediation design projects would be necessary for a precise comparison.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SB: false). While AECOM Technical Services, Inc. is a large business, opportunities for small businesses may exist as subcontractors on this task order.
Oversight & Accountability
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this task order. Robust oversight will be crucial to ensure the project stays on schedule, within budget, and achieves the intended remediation goals.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is lengthy (approx. 5 years).
- Complexity of Superfund site remediation.
- Reliance on specific remediation technologies (ISTR, ISCR).
- Potential for scope creep or unforeseen site conditions.
Tags
remediation-services, environmental-protection-agency, ca, delivery-order, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $6.1 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) IS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE EPA FOR PREPARATION OF REMEDIAL DESIGNS (RDS) FOR TWO COMPONENTS OF THE SELECTED REMEDY FOR THE BAGHURST DRIVE SUPERFUND SITE (SITE): IN SITU THERMAL REMEDIATION (ISTR) AND IN SITU CHE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $6.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-10-03. End: 2028-04-02.
What is the estimated cost per unit of remediation design, and how does it compare to industry standards for similar Superfund sites?
A precise per-unit cost for remediation design is not explicitly provided in the data. However, the total award of $6.06 million over approximately five years for two components of a Superfund site suggests a significant investment. To benchmark, one would need to compare this to the scope of work, complexity of the site, and the specific remediation technologies proposed against similar contracts awarded by the EPA or other environmental agencies.
What are the primary risks associated with the chosen remediation technologies (ISTR and ISCR), and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Key risks for ISTR include potential for vapor intrusion, subsurface utility damage, and energy consumption. ISCR risks involve incomplete reactions, potential for groundwater contamination migration, and long-term effectiveness. Mitigation strategies typically involve detailed site characterization, robust monitoring plans, adaptive management approaches, and contingency planning for unforeseen conditions during the design and implementation phases.
How effectively will the Remedial Designs (RDs) translate into successful on-the-ground remediation and long-term site closure?
The effectiveness of the RDs hinges on the thoroughness of the site investigation, the appropriateness of the selected technologies, and the clarity of the design specifications. Successful implementation requires close collaboration between the designer (AECOM), the EPA, and future contractors. Ongoing monitoring and adaptive management during the remediation phase will be critical to ensure the designs achieve the desired environmental outcomes and contribute to eventual site closure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 68HE0322R0009
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 300 S GRAND AVE STE 1100, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90071
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $6,112,704
Exercised Options: $6,112,704
Current Obligation: $6,057,464
Actual Outlays: $4,840,308
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 10
Total Subaward Amount: $2,174,391
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 68HE0318D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-10-03
Current End Date: 2028-04-02
Potential End Date: 2028-04-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-24
More Contracts from AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
- DB Repair Berths 40 and 41, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, VA — $229.7M (Department of Defense)
- L-536 Interim/Final Levee Repairs — $121.5M (Department of Defense)
- Alternate Care Facility (ACF): Suny OLD Westbury - OLD Westbury, NY — $121.4M (Department of Defense)
- Fwda Parcel 3 Closure&corrective Action, Fort Wingate Depot Activity, Mckinley County, NEW Mexico — $107.1M (Department of Defense)
- Typhoon Mawar Recovery AT Various Locations in Joint Region Maria — $101.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)