DoD's $107M Fort Wingate cleanup contract with AECOM awarded via full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $107,092,535 ($107.1M)
Contractor: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-08-19
End Date: 2025-02-18
Contract Duration: 3,105 days
Daily Burn Rate: $34.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF FWDA PARCEL 3 CLOSURE&CORRECTIVE ACTION, FORT WINGATE DEPOT ACTIVITY, MCKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Place of Performance
Location: FORT WINGATE, MCKINLEY County, NEW MEXICO, 87316
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $107.1 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF FWDA PARCEL 3 CLOSURE&CORRECTIVE ACTION, FORT WINGATE DEPOT ACTIVITY, MCKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Key points: 1. Contract value of $107M for environmental remediation services. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Long duration of over 8 years (3105 days) for a complex cleanup project. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 5. Project located in McKinley County, New Mexico, addressing environmental concerns at a depot activity. 6. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. is the sole awardee. 7. No small business set-aside indicated, but subcontracting opportunities may exist.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value of $107 million for environmental remediation services over an estimated 3105 days requires careful benchmarking against similar large-scale cleanup projects. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, assessing value for money is challenging. The firm-fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty, but the long duration could introduce risks if not managed effectively. Comparing AECOM's proposed pricing to other bids received during the full and open competition would offer a clearer picture of its competitiveness.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. With 6 bids received, the competition level appears moderate, which generally supports price discovery. The government's ability to solicit and evaluate multiple proposals suggests an effort to secure competitive pricing and identify the best value solution for the remediation services required at Fort Wingate Depot Activity.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging innovative solutions from multiple contractors.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the residents and environment of McKinley County, New Mexico, through the cleanup of a former military depot. Services delivered include closure and corrective action for environmental contamination. Geographic impact is localized to Fort Wingate Depot Activity in New Mexico. Potential workforce implications for environmental engineers, technicians, and construction labor in the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 8 years) increases the risk of cost overruns or scope creep if not meticulously managed.
- Firm Fixed Price contracts can be challenging for complex environmental remediation where unforeseen site conditions may arise.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess contractor performance proactively.
- Reliance on a single contractor for an extended period could limit flexibility in adapting to new remediation technologies or regulatory changes.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust vetting of potential contractors.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, assuming well-defined scope.
- The contract addresses critical environmental cleanup needs at a former military installation.
- Moderate number of bids (6) indicates a degree of market interest and competition.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation Services sector, a significant segment of the government contracting market focused on cleaning up contaminated sites, often former industrial or military facilities. The market size for environmental remediation is substantial, driven by regulatory requirements and historical land use. This specific contract addresses closure and corrective actions at a Department of Defense facility, a common area for such services. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale environmental cleanup contracts awarded by federal agencies like the EPA or other military branches.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large-scale environmental remediation project, it is likely that the prime contractor, AECOM Technical Services, Inc., will engage subcontractors. The extent to which small businesses will participate will depend on AECOM's subcontracting plan and the availability of specialized small businesses capable of performing specific tasks within the overall remediation effort. Further analysis of subcontracting reports would be needed to determine the actual impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring, compliance checks, and financial oversight are standard mechanisms. Transparency is often facilitated through contract award databases and potentially through public reports on environmental cleanup progress, though specific details are not provided here. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Department of Defense Cleanup Programs
- Fort Wingate Depot Activity Operations
- Hazardous Waste Management Contracts
- Federal Land Remediation
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of cost escalation or scope creep.
- Environmental remediation projects can face unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
- Firm Fixed Price contracts can be challenging for complex, long-term projects with inherent uncertainties.
Tags
environmental-remediation, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, new-mexico, mckinley-county, large-contract, environmental-cleanup, military-depot
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $107.1 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF FWDA PARCEL 3 CLOSURE&CORRECTIVE ACTION, FORT WINGATE DEPOT ACTIVITY, MCKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $107.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-08-19. End: 2025-02-18.
What is AECOM Technical Services, Inc.'s track record with similar large-scale environmental remediation contracts for the Department of Defense?
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. has a significant history of performing large-scale environmental remediation and engineering services for various government agencies, including the Department of Defense. They have been involved in numerous projects addressing complex contamination issues at military installations, Superfund sites, and other federal facilities. Their experience often includes site investigation, risk assessment, remedial design, construction, and long-term monitoring. Analyzing their past performance on contracts of similar scope, duration, and complexity would provide insight into their capabilities and potential risks associated with this specific Fort Wingate contract. Specific details on past performance ratings, any past disputes, or contract modifications on prior DoD projects would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment.
How does the $107 million contract value compare to other federal environmental remediation contracts of similar scope?
The $107 million contract value for environmental remediation services at Fort Wingate Depot Activity is substantial, reflecting the complexity and scale typically associated with closing and correcting environmental issues at former military installations. To benchmark this value, one would compare it against other large federal remediation contracts, particularly those awarded by the Department of Defense or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for similar types of contamination (e.g., hazardous waste, unexploded ordnance, petroleum products) and over comparable timeframes. Factors such as geographic location, specific remediation technologies required, and regulatory frameworks can influence costs. A preliminary comparison suggests this value is within the expected range for major environmental cleanup efforts, but a detailed analysis of contract scope, duration, and specific deliverables against comparable contracts is necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment.
What are the primary environmental risks being addressed under this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
The primary environmental risks addressed under this contract likely stem from historical activities at the Fort Wingate Depot Activity, which could include contamination from hazardous materials, petroleum products, solvents, or potentially unexploded ordnance, depending on the depot's operational history. The contract's objective, 'Closure & Corrective Action,' indicates a focus on identifying, assessing, and remediating these contaminants to meet regulatory standards and ensure public and environmental safety. Mitigation strategies would involve a phased approach: site characterization to pinpoint the extent and nature of contamination, development and implementation of specific remediation technologies (e.g., soil excavation, groundwater treatment, in-situ methods), and long-term monitoring to confirm the effectiveness of the cleanup. The specific risks and mitigation plans are detailed in the contract's statement of work and associated environmental permits.
What is the expected timeline for completion, and what are the key milestones for this contract?
The contract has an estimated duration of 3105 days, which translates to approximately 8.5 years, from its award date of August 19, 2016, to its estimated completion date of February 18, 2025. This extended timeline is typical for large-scale environmental remediation projects that often involve multiple phases, including detailed site investigations, feasibility studies, remedial design, phased construction and cleanup activities, and post-remediation monitoring. Key milestones would likely include the completion of site characterization reports, approval of remedial action plans, successful execution of specific cleanup phases (e.g., soil removal, groundwater treatment system installation and operation), and final site closure documentation submitted to regulatory agencies. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests these milestones and associated payments are contractually defined.
How has federal spending on environmental remediation at military depots like Fort Wingate evolved over the past decade?
Federal spending on environmental remediation at military depots, including facilities like Fort Wingate, has been a consistent and significant expenditure for the Department of Defense (DoD) over the past decade. Driven by legislation such as CERCLA (Superfund) and RCRA, the DoD is responsible for addressing contamination at current and former installations. Spending in this area is influenced by factors like the identification of new contamination, evolving regulatory standards, technological advancements in cleanup methods, and the prioritization of cleanup efforts across numerous sites. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on budget allocations and project needs, there has been a sustained commitment to funding these long-term cleanup initiatives. Contracts like this one represent a portion of that ongoing investment, often awarded through competitive processes to specialized environmental firms.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912BV16R0055
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 300 S GRAND AVE, SUITE 1100, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90071
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $107,092,535
Exercised Options: $107,092,535
Current Obligation: $107,092,535
Actual Outlays: $4,443,849
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 134
Total Subaward Amount: $11,663,452
Contract Characteristics
Consolidated Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-08-19
Current End Date: 2025-02-18
Potential End Date: 2025-02-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-08-16
More Contracts from AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
- DB Repair Berths 40 and 41, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, VA — $229.7M (Department of Defense)
- L-536 Interim/Final Levee Repairs — $121.5M (Department of Defense)
- Alternate Care Facility (ACF): Suny OLD Westbury - OLD Westbury, NY — $121.4M (Department of Defense)
- Typhoon Mawar Recovery AT Various Locations in Joint Region Maria — $101.4M (Department of Defense)
- Little Scioto River Task Order — $73.0M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)