EPA awards $2.1M field services contract to Nobis Engineering for remediation support in New Hampshire

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,116,646 ($2.1M)

Contractor: Nobis Engineering, Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2021-09-24

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,832 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REGION 3 MULTI-SITE FIELD SERVICES SUPPORT THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) WITH FIELD

Place of Performance

Location: CONCORD, MERRIMACK County, NEW HAMPSHIRE, 03301

State: New Hampshire Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $2.1 million to NOBIS ENGINEERING, INC for work described as: REGION 3 MULTI-SITE FIELD SERVICES SUPPORT THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) WITH FIELD Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized environmental field services over a multi-year period. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. Contract duration of over 5 years indicates a need for sustained support in environmental remediation. 4. The contract aligns with EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment. 5. Focus on remediation services highlights a critical area of environmental management. 6. The award to a single contractor, Nobis Engineering, Inc., suggests they were the most qualified bidder.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.1 million over approximately five years for multi-site field services support appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized environmental services. Benchmarking against similar EPA contracts for remediation and field support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the scope and duration, the pricing is not immediately indicative of overpayment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources,' which typically means it was competed broadly, but specific sources may have been excluded for defined reasons. The presence of 3 bidders indicates a degree of competition. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The specific reasons for excluding other sources, if any, would be crucial for a complete understanding of the competition dynamics.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with a limited number of bidders, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging competitive pricing and ensuring that the government receives services from qualified providers at a fair market rate.

Public Impact

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benefits from this contract by securing essential field services for environmental remediation projects. The contract delivers critical support for environmental monitoring, sampling, and assessment activities. Geographic impact is focused on Region 3 sites, with specific operations in New Hampshire. The contract supports a specialized workforce in environmental engineering and field services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. The market for environmental consulting and remediation services is substantial, driven by regulatory compliance, infrastructure development, and legacy site cleanup. Spending in this area is often influenced by federal and state environmental policies. Comparable contracts typically involve site assessments, remediation design, and field support for agencies like the EPA, Department of Defense, and Department of the Interior.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem. However, the primary contractor, Nobis Engineering, Inc., is a medium-sized business, suggesting potential opportunities for smaller subcontractors if they are utilized.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officer and project managers. They are responsible for monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving payments. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

environmental-services, environmental-protection-agency, epa, region-3, new-hampshire, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, remediation-services, field-services, engineering-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $2.1 million to NOBIS ENGINEERING, INC. REGION 3 MULTI-SITE FIELD SERVICES SUPPORT THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) WITH FIELD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NOBIS ENGINEERING, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-24. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of Nobis Engineering, Inc. with the EPA and similar federal agencies?

Nobis Engineering, Inc. has a history of performing environmental consulting and engineering services for various federal agencies, including the EPA. Their past performance data, often available through federal procurement databases, would detail their successful completion of similar contracts, adherence to schedules, and quality of work. Analyzing their prior awards and performance reviews can indicate their reliability and expertise in areas such as site assessment, remediation design, and field operations. A review of their contract history would reveal the types of projects they have undertaken, their performance ratings, and any past issues or disputes, providing a basis for assessing their suitability for this current task order.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar environmental field services?

Determining the precise market rate for these services requires detailed benchmarking against comparable contracts awarded by the EPA and other federal agencies for similar scope, duration, and geographic location. Factors such as the specific types of field services (e.g., sampling, monitoring, site characterization), the complexity of the environmental conditions, and the required technical expertise influence pricing. While the $2.1 million total award over approximately five years suggests an average annual value of around $420,000, a detailed cost analysis comparing labor rates, equipment costs, and overhead to industry standards is necessary for a definitive value assessment. Without access to detailed pricing breakdowns and broader market data, a precise comparison is challenging.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) for this contract?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this task order are not detailed in the provided summary data. Typically, for environmental field services contracts, KPIs would focus on aspects such as timely completion of sampling events, accuracy of data collection, adherence to health and safety protocols, environmental compliance during field operations, and responsiveness to EPA requests. SLAs might define response times for urgent site issues or reporting deadlines. The EPA's project officers would monitor these metrics to ensure the contractor meets the required standards for environmental remediation support.

What is the historical spending trend for similar field services support at EPA Region 3?

Historical spending data for similar field services support at EPA Region 3 would provide context for the current $2.1 million award. Analyzing past contracts for environmental remediation, site assessment, and field operations within this region would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured. This analysis could indicate whether current spending is consistent with historical patterns, or if there has been a significant increase or decrease. Understanding these trends can help assess if the current contract represents a typical investment or a deviation, potentially signaling changes in program priorities or environmental challenges within Region 3.

Are there any specific environmental risks or challenges associated with the sites covered by this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the environmental risks or challenges at the sites covered by this contract. However, the contract's purpose is to provide 'Field Services Support' for 'Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)' and 'Remediation Services,' implying that the sites likely involve contamination or require environmental monitoring and cleanup. These could range from legacy industrial pollution, hazardous waste sites, or areas impacted by natural disasters. The specific risks would be detailed in the task order's statement of work, guiding the scope of Nobis Engineering's field activities and remediation efforts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesRemediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 68HE0321Q0009

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 18 CHENELL DR, CONCORD, NH, 03301

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,676,200

Exercised Options: $3,676,200

Current Obligation: $2,116,646

Actual Outlays: $1,909,263

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0118D0007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-09-24

Current End Date: 2026-09-30

Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-25

More Contracts from Nobis Engineering, Inc

View all Nobis Engineering, Inc federal contracts →

Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts

View all Environmental Protection Agency contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending