EPA awards Nobis Engineering $4.6M for Remediation Services, focusing on environmental cleanup
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,595,293 ($4.6M)
Contractor: Nobis Engineering, Inc
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2024-09-23
End Date: 2028-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,468 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: CREESE AND COOK RA SUPPORT (DES). AWARD AND FUNDING FOR RA001 AND RA002.
Place of Performance
Location: DANVERS, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01923
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $4.6 million to NOBIS ENGINEERING, INC for work described as: CREESE AND COOK RA SUPPORT (DES). AWARD AND FUNDING FOR RA001 AND RA002. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized environmental remediation services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Potential risks include performance delays or cost overruns common in complex remediation projects. 4. This contract supports the EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment. 5. The award falls within the broader environmental consulting and remediation sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $4.6 million for a duration of nearly five years seems aligned with the scope of remediation services. Benchmarking against similar EPA remediation contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure allows for flexibility but requires diligent oversight to manage costs effectively and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate for the work performed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition suggests a healthy market for these services.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive nature of this award, as it is likely to drive down costs and ensure the EPA receives the best possible value for its investment in environmental remediation.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are communities impacted by environmental contamination, receiving services aimed at cleanup and restoration. The contract delivers essential remediation services, addressing hazardous substances and pollutants. Geographic impact is likely focused on specific sites requiring EPA intervention, potentially across various regions. Workforce implications include employment for environmental engineers, scientists, and technicians involved in remediation activities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in complex remediation projects leading to cost increases.
- Ensuring consistent quality of remediation work across different sites and phases.
- Managing unforeseen environmental conditions that could impact project timelines and budgets.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- Contract duration allows for sustained focus on remediation objectives.
- EPA's involvement provides oversight and ensures adherence to environmental regulations.
Sector Analysis
The environmental remediation sector is a critical component of the broader environmental services industry, focused on cleaning up contaminated sites. This contract fits within the government's ongoing efforts to address legacy pollution and comply with environmental laws. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory requirements and the need to mitigate environmental risks, with government agencies like the EPA being major clients.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses. The award to Nobis Engineering, Inc., suggests it is a larger entity. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but this would depend on Nobis Engineering's subcontracting plan and the specific needs of the remediation projects.
Oversight & Accountability
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight mechanisms would include regular progress reports, site inspections, and performance reviews to ensure compliance with contract terms and environmental standards. The contract's fixed fee component also provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is maintained through public reporting of EPA contracts and environmental cleanup activities.
Related Government Programs
- Superfund Program
- RCRA Corrective Actions
- Brownfields Program
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Hazardous Waste Management
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in complex remediation projects.
- Ensuring timely completion of remediation activities.
- Managing unforeseen environmental conditions at cleanup sites.
Tags
environmental-protection, environmental-protection-agency, remediation-services, nobis-engineering-inc, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, massachusetts, federal-contract, environmental-consulting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $4.6 million to NOBIS ENGINEERING, INC. CREESE AND COOK RA SUPPORT (DES). AWARD AND FUNDING FOR RA001 AND RA002.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NOBIS ENGINEERING, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-09-23. End: 2028-09-30.
What is Nobis Engineering, Inc.'s track record with the EPA on similar remediation contracts?
Nobis Engineering, Inc. has a history of performing environmental services for various government agencies, including the EPA. Their past performance on similar remediation contracts would be a key factor in the EPA's decision-making process for this award. Reviewing their contract history, including any past performance evaluations or awards, would provide insight into their capabilities and reliability in executing complex environmental cleanup projects. Specific details on their success rates, adherence to budgets, and timely completion of prior EPA remediation tasks would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment of their track record.
How does the awarded amount compare to the typical cost of similar remediation projects managed by the EPA?
The awarded amount of approximately $4.6 million for a duration of nearly five years for remediation services needs to be benchmarked against similar EPA contracts. The complexity, scale, and type of contamination at the sites to be addressed are critical factors influencing cost. Projects involving hazardous waste removal, soil and groundwater remediation, or long-term monitoring can vary significantly in price. A comparative analysis with other EPA remediation contracts of similar scope and duration would help determine if this award represents good value for money. Factors such as geographic location, labor costs, and regulatory requirements also play a role in cost variations.
What are the primary risks associated with this specific remediation contract, and how are they being mitigated?
The primary risks associated with environmental remediation contracts often include unforeseen site conditions (e.g., discovering unexpected contaminants), potential for cost overruns due to the complexity of cleanup, and schedule delays caused by regulatory hurdles or technical challenges. For this contract, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure aims to manage costs, but requires diligent oversight. Mitigation strategies likely involve thorough site assessments, contingency planning, robust project management, and clear communication protocols between the EPA and Nobis Engineering. Regular progress reviews and performance monitoring are essential to identify and address risks proactively.
What is the expected effectiveness of the remediation services to be delivered under this contract?
The expected effectiveness of the remediation services hinges on the successful execution of the tasks outlined in the contract and the specific environmental challenges at the targeted sites. The EPA's objectives typically involve reducing or eliminating environmental hazards to protect human health and ecosystems. Effectiveness will be measured by the degree to which cleanup goals are met, compliance with environmental regulations is achieved, and long-term environmental protection is established. Nobis Engineering's technical expertise and adherence to best practices in remediation will be critical determinants of the project's success and its overall environmental impact.
How has historical spending on remediation services by the EPA trended over the past five years?
Historical spending on remediation services by the EPA has generally remained substantial, reflecting the ongoing need to address environmental contamination across the nation. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on budget allocations, program priorities, and the identification of new cleanup sites, the overall trend indicates a consistent commitment to environmental restoration. Factors such as the Superfund program's funding levels, regulatory changes, and national environmental priorities influence these spending patterns. Analyzing EPA's budget documents and contract databases over the past five years would reveal trends in obligated amounts for remediation services, providing context for the current award.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 18 CHENELL DR, CONCORD, NH, 03301
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,595,293
Exercised Options: $4,595,293
Current Obligation: $4,595,293
Actual Outlays: $775,079
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 68HE0318D0013
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-09-23
Current End Date: 2028-09-30
Potential End Date: 2028-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-02
More Contracts from Nobis Engineering, Inc
- RAC - Cpff -Task Orders: Base Year — $23.4M (Department of Defense)
- TAS::68 8195::TAS This Task Order Obligates $115,451 for Preparation of a Work Plan and Cost Estimate for Work to BE Performed AT the Silresim Chemical Corp. (silresim) Superfund Site in Lowell, MA. Once the Work Plan and Cost Estimate ARE Approved, Additional Recovery Funds Will BE Obligated for Completion of the Effort. the Purpose of This Task Order IS to Implement a Remedial Action (RA) AT the Silresim Superfund Site. the Contractor Will Have Overall Responsibility for Construction of a Final Engineered Barrier Over a Portion of the Silresim Property and Implementing Thermally-Enhanced Soil-Vapor Extraction (SVE) for the Reduction of Volatile Organic Compounds (vocs) in Shallow Soil and Groundwater. Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH) Will BE Used for VOC Reduction. ERH IS a "thermally-Enhanced" Variation of SVE That Employs Electrical Current to Heat Both the Underlying Soil and Groundwater; the Heated Contaminated Media Liberates Substantially More Contamination Which CAN Then BE Captured, Treated And/Or Destroyed. the Period of Performance IS From 11 MAY 2009 Through 30 April 2011. the Task Order HAS Been Issued Under the Region 1 Small Business Remedial Action Contract 2 (RAC2) on 11 MAY 2009, and IS Task Order Number 045-Rara-0122. Arra::yes::arra — $16.1M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Remedial Acquisition Framework (RAF), Design and Engineering Services (DES). Issuance of Task Order for the Microfab Superfund Site — $3.4M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- DES Pike Hill Copper Mines Superfund Site RA Oversight — $2.2M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Shafer/Arbuckle Creek Area Site - Remedial Acquisition Framework (RAF), Design and Engineering Services (DES) the Purpose of This Task Order (TO) IS for the Contractor to Perform Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (ri/Fs) Support Services — $2.2M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)