Consumer Product Safety Commission awards $4.15M IT contract to IT Data Consulting LLC for system operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,149,993 ($4.1M)

Contractor: IT Data Consulting LLC

Awarding Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission

Start Date: 2025-07-01

End Date: 2027-06-30

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: SYSTEM SOFTWARE - ITDS/RAM AND EFILING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Place of Performance

Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20191

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Consumer Product Safety Commission obligated $4.1 million to IT DATA CONSULTING LLC for work described as: SYSTEM SOFTWARE - ITDS/RAM AND EFILING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. The contract value of $4.15 million over approximately two years suggests a moderate investment in essential IT infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources indicates a deliberate effort to ensure fair market access, though the specific exclusion warrants review. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for services. 4. The contract supports the critical ITDS/RAM and e-filing operations, directly impacting the agency's ability to manage consumer product safety data. 5. The duration of 729 days provides a stable period for service delivery and system maintenance. 6. The contractor, IT Data Consulting LLC, is a single awardee for this delivery order, highlighting their specific role in this segment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.15 million for approximately two years of IT system operations and maintenance appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar IT support contracts for federal agencies of comparable size and complexity would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps in cost predictability. Without specific performance metrics or historical data for this exact service, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the price seems aligned with typical IT service contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This suggests that while the competition was generally open, there was a specific reason or process for excluding certain sources. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' nature implies a broad solicitation. This approach is intended to maximize competition and achieve the best possible pricing and quality for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach aims to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces and encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best terms.

Public Impact

Consumers benefit from the reliable operation of systems that track and manage product safety data, leading to quicker response to potential hazards. The agency's ability to perform its core mission of ensuring consumer product safety is directly supported by these IT services. The geographic impact is primarily national, as the Consumer Product Safety Commission operates nationwide. The contract supports IT professionals and potentially other roles within IT Data Consulting LLC, contributing to the federal IT workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The specific reason for 'Exclusion of Sources' in an otherwise 'Full and Open' competition needs further clarification to ensure no potential bidders were unfairly disadvantaged.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the contractor's past performance or potential future effectiveness beyond contract value.
The contract is a delivery order, implying it might be part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, whose overall structure and competition level are not detailed here.

Positive Signals

The use of 'Full and Open Competition' is a positive signal for market fairness and potential cost savings.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract duration of over two years offers stability for the essential IT operations it supports.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically focusing on computer systems design and related services. The market for IT support and maintenance for federal agencies is substantial, with numerous companies offering specialized services. This contract represents a portion of the government's overall IT spending, which is critical for maintaining operational capabilities across various agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing IT service contracts for agencies with similar missions and IT infrastructure needs.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside criterion for this specific contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The focus appears to be on securing the necessary IT services through the most competitive means available.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) at the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Performance monitoring, adherence to contract terms, and quality assurance are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

IT Operations and Maintenance Contracts
Computer Systems Design Services
Federal IT Infrastructure Support
Consumer Product Safety Commission IT Spending

Risk Flags

Potential for restricted competition due to 'Exclusion of Sources'
Lack of detailed performance metrics for value assessment
Limited insight into contractor's past performance

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Consumer Product Safety Commission awarded $4.1 million to IT DATA CONSULTING LLC. SYSTEM SOFTWARE - ITDS/RAM AND EFILING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is IT DATA CONSULTING LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission (Consumer Product Safety Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-07-01. End: 2027-06-30.

What is the specific nature of the 'exclusion of sources' in this 'Full and Open Competition' award, and what was the justification?

The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is a specific procurement term that requires careful interpretation. It generally means that the solicitation was made available to all responsible prospective contractors (full and open competition), but prior to the solicitation, certain sources were excluded based on specific criteria or justifications. These justifications often relate to national security, proprietary information, or unique capabilities. Without access to the specific contract file or justification documentation from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the precise reason for excluding certain sources cannot be determined. This exclusion warrants further investigation to ensure it was legally sound and did not unduly restrict competition, potentially impacting the best value achieved for the government.

How does the contract value of $4.15 million compare to similar IT system operations and maintenance contracts awarded by federal agencies?

Comparing the $4.15 million contract value requires context regarding the scope, duration, and complexity of the services provided. For a two-year contract supporting critical IT systems like ITDS/RAM and e-filing for an agency like the Consumer Product Safety Commission, this amount appears to be within a reasonable range. However, a precise benchmark would necessitate analyzing contracts for similar IT support services awarded to agencies of comparable size and mission. Factors such as the number of users supported, the criticality of the systems, the specific technologies involved, and the level of service required (e.g., 24/7 support vs. standard business hours) significantly influence pricing. Without these granular details, the value is considered fair but not definitively exceptional or concerning.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract, and how is performance being measured?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, IT operations and maintenance contracts include metrics related to system uptime, response times for issue resolution, data integrity, and security compliance. The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) at the Consumer Product Safety Commission would be responsible for monitoring the contractor's performance against these agreed-upon metrics. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor is obligated to deliver the specified services regardless of the actual effort expended, but performance quality is still paramount and usually tied to payment milestones or contract continuation.

What is the track record of IT Data Consulting LLC in performing similar federal IT support contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of IT Data Consulting LLC in performing similar federal IT support contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations on federal contracts, including any past performance questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) reports. These reports would offer insights into their reliability, quality of service, adherence to schedule and budget, and overall customer satisfaction on previous government engagements. Without this information, it is difficult to definitively assess their suitability and past success in delivering comparable services.

What is the historical spending pattern for ITDS/RAM and e-filing operations and maintenance at the Consumer Product Safety Commission?

The provided data only pertains to a single delivery order awarded to IT Data Consulting LLC. It does not offer historical spending patterns for the ITDS/RAM and e-filing operations and maintenance at the Consumer Product Safety Commission. To understand historical spending, one would need to analyze procurement data over several fiscal years, identifying all contracts related to these specific IT functions, their values, durations, and awardees. This analysis would reveal trends in spending, identify potential increases or decreases in investment, and highlight any shifts in contracting strategies or vendor relationships over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - DELIVERY

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 61320625Q0005

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: IT Data Consulting L.L.C.

Address: 12020 SUNRISE VALLEY DR STE 100, RESTON, VA, 20191

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,149,993

Exercised Options: $4,149,993

Current Obligation: $4,149,993

Actual Outlays: $1,297,327

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCB21D0358

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline